Good but limited story isn’t as fun or as funny as I hoped it would be, or as it looked to be. Good stuff here, but uncomfortable to watch.
What’s more:
The Duplass brothers are really making a name for themselves with their unique and well-executed stories. This one has one of the better premises out there, but its limited in its scope and doesn’t quite live up to the concept.
When they were kids, ultra-competitive brothers Mark & Jeremy staged their own 25-event competition: the Do-Deca-Pentathlon. The contest was tied at 12 events apiece when the deciding event was stopped by their mother, fearing that Mark was in danger. The incomplete challenge has hung over both brothers ever since, ruining their relationship.
The story finds Mark returning with his wife and son to his childhood home for a birthday weekend, including a local race; an event to which the estranged Jeremy has not been invited. When Jeremy crashes the festivities anyway, announcing his arrival in town by literally jumping into the race to try to beat his brother to the finish line, it’s clear that this isn’t going to be the stress-free weekend that Mark’s doctor has advised.
Every activity between these two is a competition, and it’s clearly an unhealthy dynamic for everyone involved. When Jeremy proposes that they finally settle things between them by engaging in the Do-Deca again, it threatens to rip the family apart. It’s really unpleasant to watch, frankly. In the best manner of truth-filled comedies, it really rips open scar tissue and unflinchingly displays real human emotion and interactions in all of their awkward and unlovable glory.
But I must admit that it’s a little more intense than I was expecting. It seems positioned as a slightly offbeat comedy, but it’s really more a family drama with moments of absurdity. It’s really good stuff, just not quite how it was billed. It also suffers a bit from being a one-note song. The idea is great, but it’s the only idea. That shouldn’t really be a problem, since the movie is a startlingly short 76 minutes, but it actually doesn’t quite engage for even that short of a run-time.
It’s not a feel-good summer hit, but The Do-Deca-Pentathlon is a well made picture.
It’s not the worst movie you’ve ever seen. Faint praise, maybe, but most every other review has given that impression. #StillBetterThanTOD
What’s more:
Let’s get the simple stuff out of the way first.
You’re right, they never should have made this movie; should have left off in 1989 with Last Crusade. Was a perfectly logical place to stop.
Yes, Harrison Ford is far too old to play this role.
Spielberg, Ford and everyone else who blanched at making a sci-fi “B” movie should have stuck with their gut and told Lucas to get real.
Now that we’ve gotten that out of the way, how is this admittedly ill-advised film? Meh…
When this came out in 2008, I was rooting for it; hard. I really wanted to love it in spite of how nervous I was and how against the existence of the movie I was. It arrived in theaters with a ton of pressure, which it never could have lived up to – and didn’t. I didn’t condemn it as a total loss, but I sure wasn’t pleased.
The internet reacts to the new Indiana Jones movie…
But a funny thing happened when it came out on home video; I watched it at home and kind of liked it. Once I had accepted that it really wasn’t a very good movie and got over all the things it wasn’t, I was able to see it for what it was. And in truth, there’s a lot of stuff to like here (to go along with the myriad things to dislike). All the stuff that made me apoplectic in the theater merely annoyed me at home. Faint distinction perhaps, but it’s there.
Seriously, try it for yourself at home. It isn’t a good movie and so don’t look for it to be. Just watch it knowing that so many talented people can make for some moments even if the sum total is somewhat lacking.
I mean, really, it’s not that bad. Ford isn’t that old here. Now if they tried to have him play, say Han Solo at his age, that would be a real problem. Can you imagine?
Play-by-play (thoughts written down while watching the movie):
Old Paramount logo dissolving into prairie dog mound – cute. Digital prairie dogs? Less so…
Drag-racing to bring us right into the time period is a good touch and gives some energy. This is also the last time anything in the movie will look good. Janusz Kaminski is a fine cinematographer, but the movie looks awful. I know they worked really hard to study Slocombe’s style and lighting, but it just isn’t working.
19 years after Last Crusade, both in real life and in setting of 1957
The costumes just look off…
Dr. Spalko – can’t decide if I hate the character more than I hate Blanchett’s performance. Tough call…
A sword? Really?
The problem here with the opening is that you’re just being dropped into it – that’s fine, but there isn’t feeling of an established relationship as there was with Belloq, so it’s not as effective.
Indy’s moving in slow-motion. I’m not going to spend the whole review saying Ford is too old for the character, so let’s just say it once and be done with it…
Some good stunts, though…
Rocket sled is cool setpiece.
What, they don’t know where he is but just leave?
Atomic test site is creepy, but not as creepy as he looks in modern time.
Sigh…the refrigerator gag…
I didn’t realize how much they’re relying on shorthand of common knowledge until I watched this with my daughter and had to pause for ten minutes to explain Communism and McCarthyism.
They had to dress LaBeouf as Brando? Really?
This plot is beyond confusing. I’ve seen the movie 3-4 times now and I still haven’t figured out what Harold Oxley has to do with “Mutt”. Must be a script remnant from when they were making this character Abner Ravenwood.
Exposition deadly…
Motorcycle chase through “Barnett College” (Yale) pretty good with good practical effects, not digital, even though the body doubles are pretty hard to not see.
Broadbent is always great, of course, but it’s a wrench not seeing Denholm Elliot…
The Peruvian cemetery set is pretty good. In fact this sequence may be the best in the film, although I’m still not sure who the heck these guys attacking them actually are.
The character of “Mutt” is such a problem for this movie. It’s sort of hard to get past, even when you’ve let most of the other stuff go. Contrary to what you might suspect, I really don’t have a problem with Shia LeBeouf. He was so good in The Greatest Game Ever Played that I’ve given him a pass since then (which is easy, because he makes crap movies that I don’t see).
But Karen Allen is back! Never mind, all is forgiven.
I actually stopped making notes after awhile because I just wanted to watch the movie, and I was frankly finding my nitpicking to start seriously affecting my ability to enjoy the movie. And I do actually enjoy Crystal Skull, although it’s hard to justify why. When I note all the things about the movie in a list, it seems really awful. And it isn’t a good movie – it has way too many problems for that. But my daughter was really having a good time with it, so I lightened up a bit. And there were enough fun scenes, barely. I guess I’m just not quite as hard on this movie as I probably should be. That’s what comes of wanting to enjoy something – sometimes you succeed…
Famed archaeologist/adventurer Dr. Henry “Indiana” Jones is called back into action when he becomes entangled in a Soviet plot to uncover the secret behind mysterious artifacts known as the Crystal Skulls.
Now that’s more like it! Shrugging off joylessness of Temple of Doom, fun-loving but not slight. Still as much fun as it was 25 years ago…
What’s more:
After the mine cart wreck that was Temple of Doom, virtually everyone involved realized that if the franchise was to continue, a return to form was necessary. (Spielberg wanted “to apologize for the second one”.) One of the ideas frequently suggested by Temple of Doom supporters is that the Indy trilogy closely mirrors the Star Wars Trilogy. That is to say, Raiders was the fun-loving adventure in the vein of Star Wars (1977) and so Temple of Doom followed the mold of The Empire Strikes Back, in that it was darker and more serious. I don’t doubt that was the intent – Lucas has stated as much – but it falls apart for two principal reasons.
The first is that Empire had to be darker as it was the second part of a three-part story and so needed to develop and raise the stakes; that’s not what Temple did – it was a prequel so the chronology doesn’t make sense. (Besides, Empire is the greatest sequel ever made and Temple sucked – not because it was dark, but because it was poorly conceived and executed.)
The second reason is that The Last Crusade is by extension the Return of the Jedi of this series, which is nonsense. I know, Last Crusade has some cutesy moments and if you liked Temple you would necessarily regard this third installment as a dumbing down or retread of the original, much as Jedi is (rightly) accused of. But while The Last Crusade is certainly the most family friendly, humorous and accessible of the series, that isn’t actually supposed to be a bad thing. You get that, right? Trying to make crowd-pleasing movies isn’t in of itself a flawed plan. If you sacrifice the character of your story (or your characters) in order to appease, well, yes, that’s pandering and shame on you. But I reject the idea that The Last Crusade does this. On the contrary, I believe it to be nearly as good of a film as the original Raiders, and if it lacks the edge of the original (and it does), so did all of the parties involved. Everyone was 8 years richer and fatter and more content.(Besides, if this is Jedi, where are the Ewoks? If anything, Short Round is the Ewok of this series…)
No, the two big trilogies have some significant differences to go with their many similarities, although it is certainly difficult to not think of these franchises as relatives. (Note: I wonder if one of the reasons that Temple is so divisive as a film is because it was released after Jedi? Certainly you brought your feelings about the final SW film into the theater with you when you saw Indy 2.) Last Crusade needs to be judged on its own merits. And how does it fare? Wonderfully…
Writing this installment was a circuitous journey; Chris Columbus first sent Indy to Africa to battle the Monkey King. Wisely passing on the chance to insult all of African descent as they had recently those of Indian descent, Spielberg came up with the introduction of Henry Jones, Sr. and worked with first Menno Meyjes, then Jeffrey Boam (Innerspace, The Lost Boys) to come up with the screenplay. (They weren’t done there, though, as Tom Stoppard did an uncredited rewrite of almost all of the dialogue and some of the scenes.) None of this is visible on-screen, as the story feels very streamlined and direct.
It’s a funny movie, which may be one reason so many people count this as their favorite. It had been five years since the humorless 2nd film, and during that time Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home (or as it seems generally to be known “the one with the whales”) had come out and made fans of even non-Trek moviegoers. I can’t help but think that was noted by Lucas & Spielberg, but in truth, all of their films had a great deal of humor.
The simple fact is that this is just a very good story. Yes, the tone helps, but at the end of the day it has a better story than Temple, if not quite as good as Raiders. (And heaps better than Skull…)
The actors are great, with Connery as Indy’s dad a brilliant coup. (Even if Connery is actually only 12 years older than Ford and 58 at time of filming, they were projecting the character as approximately 75.) Rhys-Davies is back as Sallah & Elliot as Brody and that’s just all kinds of good. Their inclusion in Temple wouldn’t have saved it but could have made quite a bit of difference. Kevork Malikyan has a small but important role as Kazim, some consolation for being passed over for Rhys-Davies as Sallah in Raiders. I’m a little surprised that they didn’t try to shoehorn in some cameo or mention of Short Round. If Crusade is really the family-friendly cop-out that some claim it to be, why wouldn’t they have included the precocious kid?
While I still don’t consider The Last Crusade to be the equal of Raiders, it is only because nothing can top the original. Besides, the first of anything is always special in a way that can’t be replicated. Nevertheless, I know many consider this the best installment in the franchise – I can’t agree with them, but I certainly see where they are coming from. There’s a lot to like.
Play by play (thoughts written down as I watched the movie):
Casting for this movie is inspired; Connery & Phoenix, both.
Opening scenes in Utah so gorgeous.
This started off the excitement for Young Indiana Jones – such a great series…
Phoenix eerily good as the early Indy, so many mannerisms from Ford’s portrayal of the character.
“Everybody’s lost but me.”
I wonder if Douglas Slocombe has switched to digital photography – I doubt it – can’t get much better than this…(Note: looked this up later – this was actually the last film in the nearly 50 year career for the truly gifted Slocombe, who was responsible for the cinematography of all three of the original Indy films.)
Usually I think these kind of explanatory backstory flashbacks are cute and gimmicky, and this one is, too, but it’s just so well done that it doesn’t matter.
What is also wonderful about the opening is that, similarly to the 1st movie, it sets not just the tone for the film, but provides significant story and character insight.
1938? That’s only two years after Raiders. Not the years, honey, it’s, ah, you get it…Only eight years in real life time between films 1 & 3 but that’s a long time in grumpy actor years…
I don’t really get the whole rock star treatment for a professor, but then I guess I’m a long time removed from academia.
Ah, Julian Glover makes the transition from Star Wars (Ep. V) to Indy. Great choice.
They just get to the point so quickly in this movie. Such a streamlined plot makes for a fantastic film.
Wonderful exposition scene. Write great dialogue and give it to skilled actors.
More Denholm Elliot? Yes, please…
Alison Doody as Dr. Elsa Schneider is a good pickup. She works very well here. Cute banter between the two makes sense because they are both very smart. She’s not too squeamish, either. Breath of fresh air after Willie Scott.
Henry Jones Sr. is afraid of rats. Classic…
Boat chase straight out of a Bond movie; brilliant.
“Ah, Venice.”
“Nazis. I hate these guys.”
I love the interplay between Jr. & Sr. Every scene from now until the end of the movie with these two is a treat. Just the looks between the two…
Sallah!
“Our situation has not improved.”
So much fun with something as simple as a revolving secret door. Comedy genius…
Motorcycle joust – make this happen now…
“My boy, we are pilgrims in an unholy land.”
Good effects on the zeppelin.
“Ships that pass in the night…”
The dialogue for the conversation on the zeppelin is some of the best in the series.
When Dr. Henry Jones Sr. suddenly goes missing while pursuing the Holy Grail, eminent archaeologist Indiana Jones must follow in his father’s footsteps and stop the Nazis.
Poster
Runtime
127
Tagline
He’s back in an all new adventure. Memorial Day 1989.
Temple of Doom is a terrible movie, nearly as bad as Raiders was good. I keep trying to find things to like about it & failing miserably…
What’s more:
There are people who consider this the best Indiana Jones film. I have absolutely no idea what they are watching when they see this. Maybe there’s another movie called Temple of Doom that isn’t dreadful. I do know that there are fan edits of this movie – maybe that’s what they are referring to. I have one by InfoDroid that removes all of the slapstick, monkey brains and the music number (which I actually sort of like), providing an 18 minute haircut. The thing is, I still haven’t watched it yet, even though it’s been years since I acquired it. Why? Because I’d still have to watch the other 100 minutes of the movie and I have a very hard time queuing up Indy 2. It’s just so bad.
I only watched the original film again now because today is the 30th anniversary of the release of the film and I thought I should revisit it. As a result, I’m watching the Indy movies with my daughter for the first time. I thought about skipping this one with her. After all, having just seen Raiders of the Lost Ark, why should she be grossed out and disappointed as I was 30 years ago? But ultimately I felt that I wouldn’t be doing my job as a parent if I sheltered her from all of the heartbreaks in life. She’ll need to learn to be snarky and derisive just like me…
She is now the same age I was when we filed into the Cleveland Circle Cinema in Brookline, MA thirty years ago, full of excitement at seeing the continuing adventures of Dr. Jones. The best thing that happened that night is that my parents bought me the official movie program, which I’m sad to say I let go of in a yard sale. (That is, I’m sorry I sold my Return of the Jedi program; I’m quite ok with divesting myself of the souvenir from this one…) I desperately miss those souvenir programs for big tentpole movies. Why did they ever stop making those? If they truly want to make theatrical presentations of movies events again, this might be one way to help.
The worst thing that happened that night is that they screened Temple of Doom. I vividly remember freaking out with everyone else in the theater at how gruesome it was. My folks were disgusted and spent the walk back to the car wondering why the film wasn’t given an R rating. In retrospect, it’s not really that much more grisly than the first film; the main difference may be how cruel and mean-spirited the sequel feels. Spielberg has always reveled in his ability to scare and gross out his audience, but it’s clearly understood that he’s trying to elicit fun house ride reactions that we all secretly crave. The violence in this one is more like an older kid deliberately scaring a pre-schooler by locking them in a trunk with an animal.
Want proof that they were on the wrong track with this movie? Lawrence Kasdan, who wrote such an amazing script for the first film, didn’t want any part of it. He took one look at the story and decided he didn’t even want to be associated with such a horrible and mean picture, calling it “very ugly and mean-spirited”.
As is often the case with second outings in the music world, just about anything good about the sophomore effort was unused material from the first. The minecart chase, the scenes in Shanghai, the plane escape – these were all written for Raiders.
The movie is truly awful and gets worse every time I revisit it. (Paradoxically, it looks better than ever – the restoration is fantastic and the blu-ray is gorgeous. Typical.)
Play by play (random thoughts while suffering through the movie):
Alright, here we go (stay frosty):
Growing up, I had no idea that this was a prequel. (Takes place in 1935; Raiders is 1936) I don’t know if they didn’t make that obvious or if I was just too young to pay attention to that sort of thing. I don’t think I was aware of the fact until well into adulthood.
I actually like the musical number. It’s good for setting the tone for the time period. It is the only thing Kate Capshaw does well in this movie. The ONLY thing…
Willie Scott is the worst character ever developed by Lucas. Yes, I’m including Jar Jar…
Actually, I suspect the only reason for Capshaw in this is that Spielberg was allegedly pursuing a liaison with her – not sure if real or implied, but if you watch the behind-the-scenes footage on this it’s sickening – like watching a septuagenarian play footsie with a co-ed.
Club Obi Wan. Funny…
Short Round. Hmm…
1935 Shanghai is a great location for adventure – should have stayed there for the whole film…
Aykroyd – interesting cameo.
I love Indy changing from tuxedo to his usual rags. Yeah, that’s what I usually do when starting a transcontinental flight.
The blu-ray really looks great – fantastic job.
Bad blue-screen when they take the raft out of the plane crash. Wait, they take a raft out of a plane crash? I withdraw my first complaint.
Now we’re in India, and that’s a big part of the problem, frankly. Just doesn’t make for a good setting.
And the tone is all wrong. If they wanted to make a prequel, Indy should be a different character, but he isn’t. There’s nothing new here.
There are nice touches early in the film of Indy showing his education. Too few and too infrequent.
So the Macguffin is a stone? Or is it the children? I’m already confused, and I’ve seen this dozens of times.
“Biggest trouble with her is the noise.”
I love that Short Round cheats at poker…
The dining scene is so unbelievably offensive, even in this movie, which already set new standards for cultural insensitivity. How did this ever get approved?
Bedroom scene: my daughter just turned to me and said “that’s the worst flirting ever”. Well spotted, kiddo…
Even before the heart-ripping out scene, this definitely earned the criticism that it was far too violent for a PG movie. I think it’s funny that this movie reportedly was single-handedly responsible for the creation of the PG-13 rating, yet they didn’t go back and apply the new rating to the film.
Sigh – Spielberg grossing you out and stuff jumping out at people. Grow up, son…
See, it’s not that this whole cult in India storyline is so poor (although it is), it’s that this is one of only 3 (technically 4) Indy movies. If this were simply a novel or comic, it would be just another chapter in the adventures of Indiana Jones. Since it’s a movie, it has to be a really great chapter. And it ain’t…
Did I already say bad blue-screen in this movie? Bad blue-screen in this movie…
Why is this movie so dark? Reportedly because George Lucas was in the middle of getting divorced when his wife left him for another guy. When Uncle George gets sad, hearts get ripped out. Metaphor much?
So Spielberg, sensing that this was all getting a bit heavy, would try to lighten the mood in the only way he knew how, with slapstick and cheap gross-out jokes. That’s why this thing is so wildly uneven tone-wise.
I think this movie exists solely to make The Crystal Skull look better by comparison…
Remind me again, why is it ok to use makeup to cast white actors as Indian but not to use blackface?
I wonder if Spielberg would have been ok with it if Lucas had made the cultists Israeli and all talk in exaggerated Shylock mannerisms?
The whole voodoo doll thing is seriously over-egging the pudding. It’s just too much…
I think Short Round punches out more people than Indy does. Also, it seems like Indy only uses his whip a few times in the whole picture.
Once you know that Ford herniated his back during shooting and that tons of the work including virtually everything under the palace was done by stuntman Vic Armstrong, it’s kind of hard to un-see it. The whole mine cart sequence, which was one of the few highlights of the movie as a kid, is so obviously miniatures that it’s completely ruined for me (and now you…you’re welcome.)
With Indy’s feet smoking, they just came a whip’s length from pulling a Yosemite Sam “My biscuits are burnin’!”
This villain isn’t exactly Shakespearean material…
Thank goodness for the English-led Indians, taking care of these savages, what?
By my reckoning, there should still be some 500-700 Thuggees left after the climax of the film. What gives?
After arriving in India, Indiana Jones is asked by a desperate village to find a mystical stone. He agrees, and stumbles upon a secret cult plotting a terrible plan in the catacombs of an ancient palace.
Poster
Runtime
118
Tagline
If adventure has a name… it must be Indiana Jones.
Maybe the greatest adventure film of all time (not counting ones with lightsabers). Lucas & Spielberg assemble a dream team of filmmakers…
What’s more:
Has there ever been another case of two of the most successful filmmakers in the world getting together to make something equal to their talents? It is so improbable that we’d get the chance to have Raiders of the Lost Ark in our cinematic landscape, which makes it all the more special.
You know all the stories; the two directors were vacationing after Lucas completed his most recent film (Star Wars), a tradition for the friends, when Spielberg mentioned his desire to do a James Bond movie. This gave Lucas the opportunity to pitch his friend a “better” character, Indiana Smith. Lucas had developed the adventurer and the rough story for Raiders with Philip Kaufman before the latter went off to make The Outlaw Josey Wales and Lucas made a little space movie.
What an amazing time! You’d have to go back to The Beatles to find an example of a few artists making such an impact over a short period of time. Think about it; in 1977 Lucas and Spielberg release Star Wars and Close Encounters of the Third Kind, respectively. They get together with brilliant screenwriter Lawrence Kasdan and bash out story ideas for Raiders over a four-day brainstorming session. They go off to make 1941 and The Empire Strikes Back. Then they make Raiders (some overlap here). While they are shooting, Spielberg works with Melissa Mathison (Harrison Ford’s then-wife) on the story for E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial. Unreal.
The list of people who worked on this film reads like a Who’s Who of Hollywood talent. Many of the crew worked on all of these movies, and so there is a consistency to a lot of the films made by these filmmakers.
Raiders of the Lost Ark perfectly captures the adventure spirit of the 30’s & 40’s serials which inspired it, but carves its own identity for those who have never seen those films. It’s hard to imagine how this movie could possibly be any better than it is, and it remains one of the greatest of all time.
Play by play (thoughts written down as I watched the movie):
Right from the first moments, you know you’re in for a treat.
One of the very best film opening sequences in history. Maybe the single best.
The pizzicato strings when the tarantulas are climbing on Indy.
Stunningly gorgeous sets by Watts. How come newer films are less convincing with their “ruins”.
There’s so little dialogue here, nor is any needed. So much conveyed non-verbally.
“Throw me the idol, I’ll throw you the whip!”
Harrison Ford should be made to watch this film before starting a new picture to remind him not to be so grumpy.
Never has paper mache looked so threatening as with the giant stone.
One of the things that makes this movie work so well is the feeling that you are walking into an established world and timeline. You don’t need to know the backstory with Belloq & Jones – you instantly get everything you need to know within 30 seconds. The later films failed to do this convincingly, especially the opening scene in 4 which was clearly trying to recapture this magic.
Plane reads “OB-CPO”
I swear that I remember seeing Reggie the snake thrown from the plane when I was a kid. One of those messed up memory things that we’re all guilty of at some point, I guess.
The easy rapport with Denholm Elliot. He’s so good…
Deadly exposition scenes are bread & butter for Kasdan. He actually makes what should be a dull but necessary scene enthralling.
How many of us wanted to become archeologists after this movie?
The mattes are very believable.
Dennis Muren cameo as German on plane.
I never could tell the gender of the Nepalese drinker that Marion is dueling with.
Oh, Karen Allen. My first movie crush…
The sound effects are a bit crazy from this scene on; the shot glasses break like windows, the punches sound like slabs of meat, Indy’s pistol a cannon…
Sallah. Such a great character. John Rhys-Davies is essentially reprising his role from Shogun, but that’s ok – he’s brilliant.
The chase through Cairo. Everyone knows the story about the famous swordfight that was cut because Ford was sick, but it’s still great.
Schnell!
Love Marion’s theme.
Paul Freeman as Belloq has such great presence.
Tunisia stands in for Egypt as successfully as it previously doubled for Tatooine…
Map room sequence is captivating visually and storywise, even if the staff height doesn’t make any sense based on the translation earlier…
“Asps. Very dangerous. You go first.”
Well of Souls is another great set, although the obligatory Spielberg gross-out scene with dead bodies is just dumb.
The flying wing fight is so good. Spielberg at his best with this sort of thing.
Practical effects > CG – take notes, kids…
“I’m making this up as I go.”
Best car/truck chase ever? May be…
The mirror gag never stops being funny…
“It’s not the years, honey, it’s the mileage.”
Yes, he should have drowned when hitching a ride on the U-Boat. So what? NOW you’re starting to nitpick? Got the wrong movie. It likely never submerged, anyway. (The U-Boat by the way is from “Das Boot”, shooting at the same time.)
At the risk of stating the obvious, the music is just so good…
“Your persistence surprises even me. You’re going to give mercenaries a bad name.”
Belloq calling Indy’s bluff is one of the film’s better non-action scenes.
When I was a kid I never understood that the guy in the ceremonial robes was Belloq. Don’t ask me why. I was only 8…
This must have been a very tough ending to sell to the studio. It’s pretty odd. The whole Wrath of God thing, not the warehouse. The warehouse is one of the best and most unexpected twists since “Rosebud”…
