Author: mfordfeeney

  • A Wrinkle in Time (2018)

    A Wrinkle in Time (2018)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    A Wrinkle in Time (2018)

    Critics, before prattling on about how simplistic & messy this film is, look at the excited & inspired kid a few rows over. Then shut up…

    A WRINKLE IN TIME

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of A Wrinkle in Time (2018):

    Thursday night (not coincidentally on International Women’s Day) my wife, daughter, and I went to see A Wrinkle in Time. We’ve all been eagerly waiting some time for this adaptation, ever since it was first announced. The trailers and released images looked great, the actors seemed well-chosen, and we were all extremely excited about the amount of representation this project signified. This is the first picture with a nine-digit budget directed by a woman of color. Even if it absolutely stunk, we were going to go see it.

    As is my custom, I had avoided the early press, but I did glance quickly at the first few lines of several reviews, just to get some sense of what we were in for. I don’t usually do this, but my girls were really looking forward to the film, and if it was getting absolutely hammered, I’d at least warn them to temper their expectations.

    Despite what the early reviews have suggested, it didn’t stink. For my well-read wife it was a solid picture, not equal to the beloved source material, of course, but a good time. For me, who hadn’t read the book since childhood, it was a really fun picture that left me happy and smiling despite its faults. For my daughter – it was AWESOME!

    wrinkle_in_time

    Look, everyone doesn’t have to get the same things out of every film. It’s hard, but you really have to take the goals of the filmmaker, the demographics of the prospective audience, and the film environment into consideration with your criticism.

    I get what the critics are harping on:

    • it’s more visually appealing than truly substantive;
    • probably overly simplifies the source material in an effort to appeal to all;
    • there’s too much music and a muddy sound mix;
    • many of the performances are over the top;
    • the outlandish costumes and design is polarizing.

    But so what? The fact that this film will miss a lot of people does not mean that it will fail to resonate with a whole lot of other people.

    wrinkle_in_time

    For example, as an adult, there was a complete lack of suspense – I never had any doubt where the story was going or if any of the main characters were in any danger. But it would be myopic and limiting for me to assume that everyone would react the same way. In fact, I found a lot of the scenes quite dark and intense for younger viewers. Don’t tell me that those filmgoers would consider the picture uneventful and slow.

    I’ll be the first to admit that I have a habit of sticking up for films that are getting panned, but the last to admit it as a character flaw. It’s important to stick up for pictures that might miss their chance to be seen in the face of overwhelming criticism.

    wrinkle_in_time

    And I must clarify here that I’m not just sticking up for the underdog here – I truly enjoyed A Wrinkle in Time.

    • I smiled from ear to ear through the whole film. It was genuinely fun.
    • I loved the child actors, led by a very promising Storm Reid as Meg Murry, a heroine I wish my daughter had been exposed to at an even earlier age.
    • I enjoyed all the adult performances, even if I could have done with much more screen-time for the charming Gugu Mbatha-Raw (and a lot less Reese Witherspoon).
    • Despite the rather short run-time, there were several scenes where emotional moments were really allowed to breathe. Too often in tentpole films, when the heroes have actually come face to face with their objective – the raison d’être – it’s just another scene. They don’t take time to actually reflect on what has been accomplished. The actors and characters in A Wrinkle in Time are given the space to actually slow down the pace and experience these moments. It’s lovely, and a credit to director Ava DuVernay.
    • The project was greenlit by Disney in the wake of Tim Burton’s dreadful but ginormously profitable Alice in Wonderland, and while it shares a few of that movie’s criticisms (over-reliance on CGI and lack of subtlety), it is worlds more grounded.

    Because at its heart, A Wrinkle in Time has one – a heart, that is. The film contains a ton of empowering, hopeful, positive messages aimed at an audience that desperately needs power, hope, and positivity. I was proud to sit alongside my wife and daughter and watch a beautiful film filled with representation, diversity, body positivity, hope, respect, and appreciation for intelligence and uniqueness.

    Poster:

    wrinkle_in_time_poster

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Pass

    The Representation Test Score: A (14! pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    A Wrinkle in Time Representation Test

    [schema type=”movie” url=”http://movies.disney.com/a-wrinkle-in-time” name=”A Wrinkle in Time” description=”After the disappearance of her scientist father, three peculiar beings send Meg, her brother, and her friend to space in order to find him.” director=”Ava DuVernay” ]

  • Kubrick’s Game (2016)

    Kubrick’s Game (2016)

    Kubrick's Game
    Kubrick’s Game by Derek Taylor Kent
    My rating: 3 of 5 stars

    Kubrick’s Game is the first adult-aimed novel from children’s author Derek Taylor Kent, who writes the Scary School series under the pen name Derek the Ghost. The author reached out to me about reading and reviewing the book, which was a great honor. I’m not sure if he approached me because of the book reviews on my site or the film reviews, but either way would make sense since Kubrick’s Game truly is a book for cinephiles.

    Molded in the fashion of books like Ready Player One and The Da Vinci Code, the story involves an elaborate and mysterious treasure hunt based on clues hidden in the films of Stanley Kubrick.

    When I recently described the book I was currently reading to my family, they said “that’s perfect for you”. And that’s mostly true. Except…

    I am not the world’s biggest Kubrick fan. I have nothing but respect for the undeniable talent of the man and extremely little patience for his method of filmmaking. He was a master of shot composition and a visionary. I acknowledge without hesitation the indelible impact of his films; they are gorgeous, wholly unique and are completely stuffed with content ripe for analysis. But I never really went in for film analysis. I find much of his work slow, dull and pretentious. The absurdly methodical “film fifty takes and see what happens” approach with ambling, overlong shots badly in need of editing defined a generation of filmmakers and is directly responsible for the “director as auteur” nonsense that we are still stuck with.

    I do not know if part of the author’s intent with Kubrick’s Game was to cultivate love of the filmmaker, but the book absolutely sent me back to the oeuvre to see if I hadn’t misjudged them. (Jury’s still out on that – I’ll let you know.)

    The story is jam-packed with facts about filmmaking in general and Kubrick in particular, a sure sign that the author has put in time in La-La Land. I found the story most engaging during these moments, with film restoration specialists and aspiring directors discussing the craft.

    The protagonist of Kubrick’s Game is Shawn Hagan, a promising film student who becomes central to a complicated game that the legendary filmmaker has engineered to take place some years after his death. Hagan is an introverted and talented young man, somewhere on the Autism spectrum, and it’s his journey that I found a little wanting. Possibly because the author is trying to convey Shawn’s difficulty with reading people, some of the plot points are delivered forcefully, without any subtlety. Other characters in the story act with transparent motives, but the story takes a long time to bring the main character up to speed. Again, I believe this is done for effect, an intentional representation of Shawn’s struggles to digest social clues, but this style of leaving obvious hints and spelling things out very slowly is also a hallmark of writing to a younger audience, and I can’t help but wonder if that is a carryover from Kent’s main writing experience.

    The only way in which the book suffers from this deliberate writing style is in the length; as engaging as the story was, I thought it could use a sizable haircut. But again, perhaps this is an homage to Kubrick…

    Lest my criticism of the feel of the story give you the wrong impression, let me be clear – I really enjoyed Kubrick’s Game. It is a well-thought out and unique story, brimming with details sure to spur the imagination and interest of fans of the director and possibly create some new devotees. While I did find the writing style somewhat exposition heavy, that sort of comes with the territory, and doesn’t detract from the imaginative hunt that drives the tale.

    Possibly more interesting to fans of Kubrick, conspiracy theorists and codebreakers, the quality of the story is engaging for all and make Kubrick’s Game easy to recommend…

    Oh, and there’s a game based on the book – a real life treasure hunt! DerekTaylorKent.com/the-game Very cool…

    [schema type=”book” url=”http://www.derektaylorkent.com/work/#/kubricksgame/” name=”Kubrick’s Game” description=”Shawn Hagan, a college film student obsessed with legendary filmmaker Stanley Kubrick, discovers hidden clues in his movies which lead him on a harrowing quest toward a mysterious treasure that Kubrick left behind. Endangered by sinister groups on the same quest, Shawn has no choice but to claim the prize first because in the wrong hands … “It has the power to change the course of history.”” author=”Derek Taylor Kent” publisher=”Evolved Publishing” pubdate=”2016-09-24″ isbn=”1622534522″ ebook=”yes” paperback=”yes” hardcover=”yes” ]

  • Empire of Imagination: Gary Gygax and the Birth of Dungeons & Dragons

    Empire of Imagination: Gary Gygax and the Birth of Dungeons & Dragons

    Empire of Imagination: Gary Gygax and the Birth of Dungeons & Dragons
    Empire of Imagination: Gary Gygax and the Birth of Dungeons & Dragons by Michael Witwer
    My rating: 4 of 5 stars

    Empire of Imagination: Gary Gygax and the Birth of Dungeons & Dragons is a fantastic biography of Dungeons & Dragons creator Gary Gygax. Written by author Michael Witwer as part of a masters’ thesis it nevertheless does not read at all like an academic work.

    Empire of Imagination is written in some ways more like an adventure story than a biography. This suits me fine, as biography is not my favorite genre. More importantly, Witwer has found the perfect tone and setting for a tale of a man who spent his life telling stories.

    Witwer very wisely chose to structure Empire of Imagination in short chapters somewhat like anecdotes. These short recollections of events lend themselves very well to the adventure style presentation. It’s an inspired touch, with the author structuring the entire work as a series of levels (broken up into +1 chapters) united into a loose narrative with vignettes of a Dungeon Master leading a player through a far-reaching quest. The result is a tale told much as though a group of friends was gathered around a game table sharing stories. Which is of course the point…

    Empire of Imagination is neither a particularly quick or long read but I found myself reading it in spurts. Partially this is due to the aforementioned breaking up of the tale into serialized pieces that you can jump in and out of. But I think largely it is because the tale is bittersweet. As much as I was enjoying the book I found myself putting it down and not returning for a bit because I didn’t want to have tales of the creation of the beloved game and all of the wonderful memories it reanimated to stop or to be sullied by the inevitable fall from grace that always accompanies these stories. While it makes for good drama it is more than a little sad to see everything that Gary Gygax created come apart in predictable fashion. It is at this time that the book falls into a bit of the typical biography mold. But then, so too did Gygax’s story…

    The book is clearly written with the input and/or approval of the Gygax estate, so I’m sure Gary gets the benefit of the doubt in all of the discussions of legal squabbles and the provenance of his works. But to this admittedly non-expert reader it comes off even-handed. No efforts are taken to whitewash the story or cover up Gygax’s foibles and failings. Others more familiar with all the details may well take exception to the handling of collaborators like Dave Arneson. The detailing of Arneson’s input and lack of involvement seems a bit one-sided, but I really have no first-hand knowledge to suggest this is not a fair telling. It’s quite possible we will never really know how accurate any accounting is regarding the creation of such a detailed game system especially considering the success that followed.

    One of the most enjoyable parts about reading the book was that I was frequently reminded of products, games, books and stories that were so integral to my childhood and teen years. There were a host of stories that I had entirely forgotten about such as the Choose Your Own Adventure-style Endless Quest book series. I’m going to have to hunt in the attic to see if I can find any of my old copies!

    I really loved reading Empire of Imagination, although to be fair I mostly listened to it. I purchased the ebook and audiobook at the same time, frequently listening and reading simultaneously. The narration for the audiobook is performed by the author’s brother, actor Sam Witwer and a better choice could not possibly have been found. His voice is deep and expressive and an excellent fit. I sincerely hope to hear more audio performances by Sam, and for that matter more stories told by Michael. The author notes in the acknowledgments that brother Sam was the Dungeon Master in their group. Hearing his narration as Empire of Imagination’s Dungeon Master in the interludes makes me wish I could sit down at the table with the brothers. Because the greatest takeaway from the book is a reminder of the spirit and desire that drove Gary Gygax; to get together with companions and play…

    [schema type=”book” url=”http://www.empireofimagination.com/” name=”Empire of Imagination: Gary Gygax and the Birth of Dungeons & Dragons” description=”The life story of Gary Gygax, godfather of all fantasy adventure games, has been told only in bits and pieces. Michael Witwer has written a dynamic, dramatized biography of Gygax from his childhood in Lake Geneva, Wisconsin to his untimely death in 2008. Gygax’s magnum opus, Dungeons & Dragons, would explode in popularity throughout the 1970s and ’80s and irreversibly alter the world of gaming. D&D is the best-known, best-selling role-playing game of all time, and it boasts an elite class of alumni–Stephen Colbert, Robin Williams, and Junot Diaz all have spoken openly about their experience with the game as teenagers, and some credit it as the workshop where their nascent imaginations were fostered. Gygax’s involvement in the industry lasted long after his dramatic and involuntary departure from D&D’s parent company, TSR, and his footprint can be seen in the genre he is largely responsible for creating. But as Witwer shows, perhaps the most compelling facet of his life and work was his unwavering commitment to the power of creativity in the face of myriad sources of adversity, whether cultural, economic, or personal. Through his creation of the role-playing genre, Gygax gave two generations of gamers the tools to invent characters and entire worlds in their minds. Told in narrative-driven and dramatic fashion, Witwer has written an engaging chronicle of the life and legacy of this emperor of the imagination.” author=”Michael Witwer” publisher=”Bloomsbury USA” pubdate=”2015-10-06″ isbn=”1632862794″ ebook=”yes” paperback=”yes” hardcover=”yes” ]

  • The Dispatcher (2016)

    The Dispatcher (2016)

    The Dispatcher
    The Dispatcher by John Scalzi
    My rating: 5 of 5 stars

     

    Gotta love John Scalzi. He really excels at the “big idea” stories, which practically is its own genre in science fiction. Nearly all of his works (or at least all of the ones I’ve read) feature some interesting concept made possible through imagined technology, then spend the rest of the time impressing you with the reality involved. It’s really remarkable – it’s as though his books are straightforward fiction that simply require you to make one leap of faith at the outset. Works every time…

    The premise needs to be really good in order to make the whole thing gel, of course. That leap of faith needs to stick the landing. But I haven’t been disappointed with the “big idea” yet. So then it’s merely a matter of delivering the rest of the story, and Scalzi is best in class in dialogue and interactions.

    In this audio-only short story, the execution works perhaps a little better than some of the full-length novels I’ve read. That’s because I really have only one criticism of his books, one that I didn’t really pick up on until I’d read several. Stated simply, the protagonists seem to have it all their own way. While they are always put in difficult and extreme situations, they all seem to roll with the punches with a somewhat unbelievable grace.

    Though I haven’t yet reviewed them, I’ve recently read Agent to the Stars and Fuzzy Nation. These followed the pattern I noted in Lock In and Redshirts. I haven’t touched the Old Man’s War yet, having no appetite for starting a huge series, so it may prove entirely different, but thus far the only flaw I’ve found in these novels is lack of suspense. The main characters don’t seem all that fallible. They make assumptions that prove to be right nearly all the time and there’s never any real concern that they won’t end up on top.

    Despite the aforementioned inevitability of success, the tale of Dispatcher Tony Valdez is a great one. The “big idea” in The Dispatcher is that for completely unknown reasons, at some point in our near future, humans who are murdered suddenly find themselves safely returned to life back in their homes. Most of the time. And there are rules, but they aren’t readily known. And only murder victims need apply…

    What I’ve written here is not a spoiler – I’ve gone into less detail than the publisher’s blurb, even. But I feel wrong saying too much here. True, when Audible announced the novella, they included the set-up and I read it when I placed my pre-order. But that was a few months ago, and I didn’t even refresh my memory as to what the story was about before pressing play. And I’m very glad for that.

    It can be so refreshing to just start a book without any preconceived notions about what you’re about to read. You have to learn something about books before deciding to read them, of course, but it seems a shame in many ways. I used to love going to a record store and selecting albums from groups I’d never heard, but solely based on the art or the titles. I had some idea of the style of music, of course, but little else. The main difference here being that with an album I could know within an hour at most whether my choice was wise. I can’t afford to start grabbing books at random, certainly not at the speed I read…

    So I’m not going to tell you any more about The Dispatcher, only that it was a fantastic tale. Similar in style to Lock In, it’s a brisk read (listen) and very enjoyable. The narration by Zachary Quinto was perfect for the story. All of the previous audiobooks I’ve heard from the author have been performed by Wil Wheaton, but I like the choice of Quinto here. He has an entirely different style and conveys emotions that match the feel of The Dispatcher. I eagerly look forward to more audio performances from him.

    Oh, and The Dispatcher is free until November 2, 2016, so get on that train…

    audible.com/dispatcher

    [schema type=”book” url=”http://www.audible.com/dispatcher” name=”The Dispatcher” description=”Zachary Quinto – best known for his role as the Nimoy-approved Spock in the recent Star Trek reboot and the menacing, power-stealing serial killer, Sylar, in Heroes – brings his well-earned sci-fi credentials and simmering intensity to this audio-exclusive novella from master storyteller John Scalzi. One day, not long from now, it becomes almost impossible to murder anyone – 999 times out of a thousand, anyone who is intentionally killed comes back. How? We don’t know. But it changes everything: war, crime, daily life. Tony Valdez is a Dispatcher – a licensed, bonded professional whose job is to humanely dispatch those whose circumstances put them in death’s crosshairs, so they can have a second chance to avoid the reaper. But when a fellow Dispatcher and former friend is apparently kidnapped, Tony learns that there are some things that are worse than death and that some people are ready to do almost anything to avenge a supposed wrong. It’s a race against time for Valdez to find his friend before it’s too late…before not even a Dispatcher can save him.” author=”John Scalzi” publisher=”Audible Audio” pubdate=”2016-10-04″ isbn=”B01KKPH1NI” ]

  • Ghostbusters (2016)

    Ghostbusters (2016)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    If you think you’re not going to enjoy this, you’re almost certainly right. It’s not made for you. That’s ok: watch how your kids eat it up.

    Ghostbusters 2016

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of Ghostbusters (2016):

    Since this will likely be a long review, let’s just get the basics down first: Ghostbusters, the 1984 film is a near perfect movie and in no way needed to be remade/rebooted. But it was always going to happen, so let’s just accept that fact and judge the movie that got made. Judgment: it is great fun and you’ll have a good time if you let yourself.

    The amount that has been written about this film even before cameras began rolling would lead you to believe this is a cultural touchstone of great, even historic importance. It isn’t. It’s a movie. If you like it, great. If you don’t, great. Let’s not get carried away here, people…

    ghostbusters2016_promo1

    Like many, I find the bile spewed by misogynistic internet trolls deeply disturbing. The fact that “people” would have such a blinding hatred for a movie – any movie – that they’d actually try to tank reviews and ratings in order to alter perception and make a picture fail is so bizarre and unsettling that it says a great deal about the nature of our “culture”. Look at that, two uses of quotes in one sentence – see what we’ve been reduced to…

    Rather than enter into a long piece about the outright misogyny that I truly believe lies at the heart of much of the outrage over the 2016 Ghostbusters (they quietly renamed the picture Ghostbusters: Answer the Call recently, but since no one else seems to be calling it that I don’t see why I should), I’m going to take the haters at their word that this isn’t about sexism and focus strictly on their non-gender-based complaints. In effect, I’m ignoring the he-man woman haters and acknowledging that there are genuine good reasons to oppose the reboot of Ghostbusters.

    Ghostbusters 2016

    Because you’re not wrong if you think this movie didn’t need to exist – it really doesn’t. In my reviews of Ghostbusters (1984) and Ghostbusters II (1989), I practically pleaded with the rights holders to let the franchise stay dormant. As you will have swiftly realized if you’ve read more than one of my reviews, I am disheartened by the whole remake/reboot modus operandi of Hollywood. So I didn’t really want them to make this picture.

    The simple fact is that it was going to be made, however. Too many people, executives and creative talent alike wanted to keep the franchise going. Sure, not all of them, which is why Ghostbusters II was such a mixed bag and why it took 27 years to get some version of Ghostbusters back on screen, but the original picture was such a beloved hit that there really was no chance whatsoever that it wasn’t going to be <drumroll> resurrected. </rimshot>

    Ghostbusters 2016

    So there’s no use whining that they shouldn’t have remade the film – they did. Get on board or stay away. Personally, I’m pulling on the proton pack. If it had to happen, I’m glad that this current team was at the helm. Because the idea of reimagining the modern team as female and populating it with some of the funniest women alive was inspired and almost entirely the reason I am behind the picture.

    We made sure to go to see the film on opening night; it’s really important to vote with your wallet – if filmmakers can point to a strong opening for a film it helps convince the suits that there’s an audience and a financial reason to make movies that don’t insult half of the human race. Think about that the next time you consider waiting to see a picture at home.

    ghostbusters2016_still12

    My daughter was incredibly excited about the film. She even gave herself a haircut inspired by Kate McKinnon’s character earlier in the day (looks awesome). We got there early, picked up our complimentary Ghostbusters pins, took a picture by the ginormous cardboard standee and proceeded to have a great time. Everyone in the theater was howling and having a blast, even applauding at the end.

    And I came to the important realization that the picture isn’t for me – it’s for the current generation. There’s really no purpose in comparing the new Ghostbusters with the old – this is something new.

    Ghostbusters 2016

    <soapbox>

    Everyone goes through this at some point, but those of us who lived through the greatest years of cinema (the 1980’s don’cha know) with a historic run of franchises are probably among the guiltiest. We got to experience Star Wars and Star Trek and Indiana Jones and Terminator and Aliens and we think we have some ownership over these things because they were so integral to our coming of age. That’s not necessarily a bad thing – it’s great to be passionate about things you love. But we’re greedy about it. We want our memories to remain sacrosanct and turn positively feral when anyone tries to update “our” properties.

    I think it’s telling that whether new Bond films please or disappoint, no one complains that their childhood is being violated. Perhaps it’s partly because the pictures are aimed at an older audience and so they didn’t get hard-wired into our formative years. But I think it has more to do with the fact that the franchise is so long-running that it doesn’t belong to any one generation. Same with Doctor Who. So why can’t we take the same view with our 80’s franchises? You can enjoy one version, one series, and another might miss you. So what?

    We all have to be grown-ups about these things and, well, grow up. Our childhood was our childhood; we got to have one. Let someone else take a turn.

    </soapbox>

    Ghostbusters 2016

    Soooo….how was the movie, pal?

    For me it was a solid good. I enjoyed it very much. For my daughter it was nearly perfect – a mammoth hit. For my wife and I, it was a very funny and solid picture. It wasn’t amazing, but it was quite good.

    Ghostbusters 2016

    Paul Feig, who rescued the picture from development hell, is a great fit for the story. He gets the tone right, which is the most important thing by far. Written by Feig and Katie Dippold (of Parks and Recreation & The Heat), the story is fine but not overwhelming – it’s a bit slight. So was the original.

    The villain, played by Neil Casey is weak and lacking an interesting backstory. So was the original. See where I’m going with this? These films are greater than the sum of their parts. The mood, the feel, the commitment to entertain – this is what you need to aim for. And Ghostbusters does exactly that.

    Ghostbusters 2016

    The story follows broadly the same rough structure as the first film, and if not horribly original, you can understand the split directive that comes with any remake/reboot; “make it like the original but not too like the original”.

    Interestingly, in some ways this film is a little too wedded to the original picture. There’s a self-awareness and the inclusion of all the cameos and references pads what is already a long run-time. The movie comes in just under the two hour barrier, and there’s new content during the credits, mid-credits and in a post credit stinger. This film is just stuffed – there’s not a lot of room to breathe.

    Ghostbusters 2016

    So I can understand why Feig went with the more is more approach. The other big reason he may have been tempted to cram everything in is that there’s so much good in there:

    • the effects are really good
    • despite Sony’s usual hallmarks (blatant product placement, antiseptic picture), the Boston for New York production looks pretty good
    • right balance of scary/funny
    • the new Ecto-1 is bangin’
    • the new gear is pretty fun

    Ghostbusters 2016

    Most importantly, the comedy is rock solid. These are some great comic actors. Kristen Wiig, Melissa McCarthy and Leslie Jones are all riotous with great chemistry. Chris Hemsworth totally goes for it as dim-witted receptionist Kevin.

    But the picture belongs to Kate McKinnon; as Dr. Jillian Holtzmann she damn near steals the whole show. I could watch another two-hour movie of the team just doing routine jobs if it meant getting to watch more Holtzmann shenanigans…

    Ghostbusters 2016

    Ghostbusters is a fun movie. It’s not a masterpiece, it’s not an abomination – it’s a very good summer movie and likely to be one of the more fun pictures I see this season. If you don’t have a bone to pick with the very existence of this picture and just want a good time, then you know who to call…

    Poster:

    ghostbusters poster

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Pass

    The Representation Test Score: A (12 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    Ghostbusters Representation Test

    [schema type=”movie” url=”www.ghostbusters.com” name=”Ghostbusters” description=”Erin Gilbert and Abby Bergman are a pair of unheralded authors who write a book positing that ghosts are real. A few years later, Gilbert lands a prestigious teaching position at Columbia University, but her book resurfaces and she is laughed out of academia. Gilbert reunites with Bergman and others when ghosts invade Manhattan and try to save the world.” director=”Paul Feig” producer=”Ivan Reitman” actor_1=”Melissa McCarthy” ]

    Main Cast Melissa McCarthy Abby Yates
    Kristen Wiig Erin Gilbert
    Kate McKinnon Jillian Holtzmann
    Leslie Jones Patty Tolan
    Rating PG-13
    Release Date Fri 15 Jul 2016 UTC
    Director Paul Feig
    Genres Action, Comedy, Sci-Fi
    Plot Following a ghost invasion of Manhattan, paranormal enthusiasts Erin Gilbert and Abby Yates, nuclear engineer Jillian Holtzmann, and subway worker Patty Tolan band together to stop the otherworldly threat.
    Poster Ghostbusters
    Runtime 116
    Tagline Who you gonna call?
    Writers Katie Dippold (written by) &, Paul Feig (written by) …
    Year 2016