Author: mfordfeeney

  • Ghostbusters (1984)

    Ghostbusters (1984)

    #140RVW

    Arguably the best comedy of the 1980’s. Do you remember how big this movie was? EVERYONE saw it. Still plays just as well 30 years later…

    Ghostbusters
    “I’m gonna take back some of the things I said about you, Harold.
    You… You’ve earned it.”

    What’s more:

    I was going to save this one for June, on the 30th anniversary of the film’s release, but with the passing of Harold Ramis this week, it seems fitting to review it now.

    Ghostbusters
    “Symmetrical book stacking. Just like the Philadelphia mass turbulence of 1947.”

    Now of course, I really didn’t need to re-watch Ghostbusters, as I’ve seen it somewhere in the neighborhood of 100 times, but this was the first time I sat down with my daughter to watch it. She loved it at least as much as I did all those years ago.

    Ghostbusters
    “I think this building should be condemned. There’s serious metal fatigue in all the load-bearing members, the wiring is substandard, it’s completely inadequate for our power needs, and the neighborhood is like a demilitarized zone.”

    By now everyone likely knows the backstory: Dan Aykroyd came up with a high-concept vehicle for John Belushi and himself, also to include Eddie Murphy & John Candy. While all of those actors would surely have been wonderful, I can’t imagine this with any other cast.

    Ghostbusters
    “Our courteous and efficient staff is on call 24 hours a day to serve all your supernatural elimination needs.”

    Co-writers Harold Ramis & Dan Aykroyd team up with sketch comedy teammate Bill Murray for one of the all-time great comedy trios. They perfectly fulfill their roles as people who have worked together forever because, well, they have. There’s a camaraderie evident that sells the whole premise of why these three very different characters are together. It comes out in the written dialogue and improvised touches.

    Ghostbusters
    “Why worry? Each one of us is carrying an unlicensed nuclear accelerator on his back.”

    Interestingly, although Ernie Hudson is introduced fairly late in the film and has none of the aforementioned history, either as an actor or in character, he complements the team well, even if the character isn’t there for any easily understandable reason. (He gets much more to do and makes more sense in the sequel.)

    Ghostbusters
    “I think he can hear you, Ray.”

    Sigourney Weaver uplifts the production with her wonderful combination of smart, tough and sexy. She pretty much cannot be overused in a movie. She always brings so much more depth to characters that could feel flat.  

    Ghostbusters
    “And the flowers are still standing!”

    Rick Moranis fills out the cast with a really excellent turn as hopeless sad sack Louis Tully (this was reportedly the role that John Candy would have filled). Moranis is one of those actors who you never think of or show any real appreciation for until he shows up and steals the whole thing. Not sure why his number is never called.

    Ghostbusters
    “There is no Dana, only Zuul!”

    Perhaps surprisingly for a comedy, the special effects are really good. Oh, I know they are dated at this point, but they hold up remarkably well. The matte lines are pretty harsh (which seems like a fixable problem if anyone wanted to spend the money) so the composited elements stand out quite a bit, but other than that the VFX are quite timeless. Good mix of stop motion and puppetry for the Zuul dogs give these animals a real-world weight. The rotoscoped proton pack streams, the traps, the miniatures – all very well done. Great sound to match.

    Ghostbusters
    “Gozer the Traveler. He will come in one of the pre-chosen forms. During the rectification of the Vuldrini, the traveler came as a large and moving Torg! Then, during the third reconciliation of the last of the McKetrick supplicants, they chose a new form for him: that of a giant Slor! Many Shuvs and Zuuls knew what it was to be roasted in the depths of the Slor that day, I can tell you!”

    There are actually a number of threads to track through this film, and director Ivan Reitman shows that he is up to the task. Always hard with comics to keep them on track and make sure the monkeys aren’t running the zoo. The whole affair moves quickly – it could frankly be a little longer without overstaying its welcome. No wonder everyone wanted a sequel or two. There was no way to repeat perfection, though.

    Ghostbusters
    “I couldn’t help it. It just popped in there.”

    Finally, the title track. I don’t think I can possibly overstate how omnipresent this song was in 1984. The song is so catchy. Of course it is – you already got it stuck in your head when it was called “I Want A New Drug” by Huey Lewis and the News. Whoops…

    Ghostbusters
    “Funny us going out like this! Killed by a 100 foot marshmallow man!”

    Now please stop trying to make Ghostbusters 3…

    Ghostbusters
    “Ray, when someone asks you if you’re a god, you say “YES”!”

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Fail

    Main Cast Bill Murray Dr. Peter Venkman, Dan Aykroyd Dr. Raymond Stantz, Sigourney Weaver Dana Barrett, Harold Ramis Dr. Egon Spengler
    Rating TV-PG
    Release Date Fri 08 Jun 1984 UTC
    Director Ivan Reitman
    Genres Comedy, Fantasy, Sci-Fi
    Plot Three unemployed parapsychology professors set up shop as a unique ghost removal service.
    Poster Ghostbusters
    Runtime 105
    Tagline Here To Save The World Again [re-release]
    Writers Dan Aykroyd (written by) and, Harold Ramis (written by)
    Year 1984
  • Little Nikita (1988)

    Little Nikita (1988)

    #140RVW

    Indifferent spy movie which stars River Phoenix & Sidney Poitier and still isn’t any good. Not bad, just uninspired & poorly thought out…

    Little Nikita

    What’s more:

    Usually when you watch old 1980’s movies you see a bunch of people you recognize. This movie is practically unique in how few familiar faces there are. After Phoenix & Poitier, Richard Jenkins is the only person you’re likely to have ever seen before. And that makes sense when you realize how little there is going on here.

    It might be stretching it a bit to call any movie with Sidney Poitier & River Phoenix underpowered, but this really does feel kind of thrown together. I’m more than a little surprised that this was a project that either of them wanted to do.

    Little Nikita

    At first glance, it’s very promising: kid thinks he’s leading normal life until he is told that his parents are sleeper agents for the USSR. Not bad, even if in 1988 it was right on the edge of being out of date.

    The trouble is that the premise that brings them out of hiding is threadbare (spy is killing sleeper agents until the Russians give him money?) and the Poitier character’s actions seem really unusual. We get that he’s looking for this one Russian spook who killed his partner (20 years ago!) but why is he working alone and what exactly is his job? He’s sorting through Air Force Academy applications and then he’s stalking a teenaged boy and asking him to spy on his parents – to what end? It’s all a bit confusing, but it doesn’t matter because you won’t really care.

    Little Nikita

    If that sounds harsh, it’s not meant to be. True, Little Nikita is not a good spy movie and in fact it’s not a very good movie at all. But it features two amazing actors (even if both are mugging furiously in this one) and was entertaining for an hour and a half and there are worse things to be.

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Fail

    Main Cast Sidney Poitier Roy Parmenter, River Phoenix Jeff Grant, Richard Jenkins Richard Grant, Caroline Kava Elizabeth Grant
    Rating PG
    Release Date Fri 18 Mar 1988 UTC
    Director Richard Benjamin
    Genres Drama, Thriller
    Plot An FBI agent works to uncover an All-American family as Soviet sleeper agents and gets caught up in friendship with their unaware son.
    Poster Little Nikita
    Runtime 98
    Tagline He went to bed an all-American kid and woke up the son of Russian spies.
    Writers John Hill (screenplay) and, Bo Goldman (screenplay) …
    Year 1988
  • Superheroes: A Never-Ending Battle (2013)

    Superheroes: A Never-Ending Battle (2013)

    #140RVW

    Wonderful documentary about the history of superheroes. Or the history of comic books. It’s a little confused on that point. But Excelsior!

    Superheroes: A Never-Ending Battle

    What’s more:

    This great documentary aired last year on PBS. It’s a well-researched and well-presented history of superheroes. Or comic books. One of those. The two are inextricably linked, so it’s not really a problem.

    Superheroes: A Never-Ending Battle

    It’s pretty straightforward stuff. All the talking heads you’d expect, and the overall story stuff won’t come as a surprise to most. There are some great nuggets here that make it very worthwhile for longtime fans, but this is basically a primer for newcomers.

    Superheroes: A Never-Ending Battle

    It’s basically an opportunity for a big-time respectable institution to say, “Hey, there’s something of merit in these funny books.” If there is a criticism to be made here it would probably be that comics don’t need your validation, PBS. Deciding that comics/heroes have value and may not be trifle isn’t exactly a new insight. But these are minor quibbles.

    Superheroes: A Never-Ending Battle

    Liev Schreiber does a good job hosting/narrating, and the gorgeous photography of classic comic panels really makes the visuals pop. There are WAY too many clips from Marvel films, but there’s lots of great archival stuff, too.

    Superheroes: A Never-Ending Battle

    The best thing I can say about Superheroes: A Never-Ending Battle is that it made me desperately want to go hit a comic shop after watching it. And that’s exactly what I did…

    Superheroes: A Never-Ending Battle

    Poster:

    Superheroes: A Never-Ending Battle

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    n/a

    Main Cast Grant Morrison Himself (3 episodes, 2013), Joe Quesada Himself (3 episodes, 2013), Mark Waid Himself (3 episodes, 2013), Len Wein Himself (3 episodes, 2013)
    Rating TV-PG
    Release Date Tue 08 Oct 2013 UTC
    Director
    Genres Documentary, History
    Plot A comprehensive history of the superhero comic book fantasy genre and its influence on American culture.
    Poster
    Runtime 180
    Tagline
    Writers
    Year 2013
  • Caddyshack (1980)

    Caddyshack (1980)

    #140RVW

    Dangerfield fails to ruin Harold Ramis’ directorial debut, a loosely strung together collection of classic improv. Unapologetically dumb…

    Caddyshack

    What’s more:

    I’m not the world’s biggest Caddyshack fan. I know that’s sacrilege to many. I’m reviewing it today because the ridiculously talented Harold Ramis has just passed away and this was his directorial debut.

    It’s hysterically funny and I enjoyed the hell out of it as a kid who was too young to be watching it. (I have no idea where I saw it – someone else’s house, that’s for sure.) It is unquestionably a comedic classic.

    Caddyshack

    But it has a few flaws that are deal breakers for me:

    • It is directly responsible for the career of Rodney Dangerfield. Really I could probably stop there. He was an obscure stand-up comic who would have likely never have gotten a break into film without this movie. And would I accept this movie having never existed as a reasonable price for having never been exposed to Rodney Dangerfield? I absolutely would. I’d take that every time.

    Caddyshack

    • Ted Knight is unwatchable. I know he’s doing his thing and it’s his shtick; I don’t care. I hate it. It was funny on the Mary Tyler Moore show. It’s cartoonish and stupid here. 

    Caddyshack

    The biggest thing against the film is also actually it’s best feature: it’s really just a long series of improvised scenes. It’s not that there isn’t a plot, it’s just that no one cares about it. Think about it – who is the star of the movie? It’s Danny Noonan, the dorky caddy played by Michael O’Keefe. You forgot he was even in the movie, didn’t you?

    Caddyshack

    This is exactly the movie you expect from a bunch of sketch comedy professionals. But then you’d expect National Lampoon’s Animal House to have felt even more like that for the same reason – but it didn’t because John Landis was able to rein in the comedians. Ramis let everyone go for it and the bit parts essentially became the film. So you get genius scenes like Bill Murray’s “Cinderella story” but you also end up with Dangerfield becoming a main character.

    In the end, the great comedy far outweighs the lack of cohesiveness, leaving us with a classic.

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Fail

    Main Cast Chevy Chase Ty Webb, Rodney Dangerfield Al Czervik, Bill Murray Carl Spackler, Ted Knight Judge Elihu Smails
    Rating R
    Release Date Fri 25 Jul 1980 UTC
    Director Harold Ramis
    Genres Comedy, Sport
    Plot An exclusive golf course has to deal with a brash new member and a destructive dancing gopher.
    Poster Caddyshack
    Runtime 98
    Tagline At last, a comedy that bites!
    Writers Brian Doyle-Murray (written by) &, Harold Ramis (written by) …
    Year 1980
  • Pretty in Pink (1986)

    Pretty in Pink (1986)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    Pretty in Pink (1986)

    Ringwald turns in her finest work in her last John Hughes Joint. Wish I saw it in the day; not quite as effective now. Duckie got jobbed…

    Pretty In Pink

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of Pretty in Pink:

    Amazingly I never saw this back in the day, so I can’t feel the same way about it that I do about some of the other John Hughes films. Written but not directed by Hughes (like a number of his films), it’s great stuff, but I kind of think you had to be there. I can’t imagine this playing for anyone who wasn’t a teenager in the 80’s.

    Pretty In Pink

    The original story is based on archetypes so old that its classic structure feels like a Shakespearean comedy. I actually kept trying to remember which play this was based on; that’s a compliment. Romantic triangle enhanced with rich guy poor girl dynamic.

    Casting is typically very good, with Molly Ringwald providing her best performance in her final Hughes film. Jon Cryer is annoyingly cute as Duckie, although I’m sure I would have loved it in 1986 – good job. Can’t imagine Anthony Michael Hall or Robert Downey Jr. in this role (both were considered). Annie Potts is funny but over the top, Andrew McCarthy is a featureless glass of milk, and James Spader made me want to climb through the screen and grab something heavy – but that was the point, I guess. I think it’s terribly appropriate that Spader’s name actually contains the name of a tool…

    Pretty In Pink

    Ending (Spoilers): The original ending saw Andie choosing Duckie over Blane. (They had to reshoot because test audiences weren’t happy; don’t get me started on test screenings.) I don’t know if that would have been the right choice; I think so. Would have been better than going with “a major appliance”. Really I don’t think she should have ended up with either of them. Blane’s a tool and Duckie is cemented in the friend zone. Maybe she should have taken a chance with Gina Gershon’s character. Ah, who am I kidding – no one is good enough for Molly Ringwald – I love you, Molly!

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Pass

    Main Cast Molly Ringwald Andie Walsh, Jon Cryer Duckie (Phil Dale), Harry Dean Stanton Jack Walsh, Annie Potts Iona
    Rating PG-13
    Release Date Fri 28 Feb 1986 UTC
    Director Howard Deutch
    Genres Comedy, Drama, Romance
    Plot A poor girl must choose between the affections of her doting childhood sweetheart and a rich but sensitive playboy.
    Poster Pretty in Pink
    Runtime 96
    Tagline He’s good. She’s good. He’s just Duckie.
    Writers John Hughes (written by)
    Year 1986