Category: Movies

  • Oh, God! (1977)

    Oh, God! (1977)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    Bet you haven’t thought of this one in forever, huh? Neither had I. Interesting to remember movies used to be this pace and no one minded…

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of Oh, God!:

    Would you believe I actually read this book before seeing the movie? It’s true. I saw the sequels as a kid, but I have just about no recollection of seeing the original picture. I do, however, remember finding the worn little paperback novel by Avery Corman in a used bookstore in Newton Highlands. It was probably age-inappropriate, but only barely – it’s not like this story ever goes very blue or very dark.

    I haven’t read the novel since I was a kid, but watching Oh, God! now, it plays almost verbatim to my memory of the story. The original novel was adapted by Larry Gelbart, whose screenplay was nominated for an Academy Award.

    It was actually really interesting watching this film series with my family. My daughter absolutely ate it up; I was quite pleasantly surprised. I knew she’d love Oh, God! Book II if we ever got to it, but that was far from a certainty. I really had no idea how she’d respond to something so dated. She’s watched older films, of course, but Oh, God! absolutely screams 1977 and I knew I’d need to explain about payphones, etc. She really enjoyed it, though…

    Oh, God!

    It’s sort of funny to look back on this film. At the time it was a big hit; it was the sixth biggest picture in 1977. It made more than Annie Hall and The Spy Who Loved Me!

    (Sidebar: what a mixed bag 1977 was – we got classic films like Star Wars, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, and Slapshot, but it also saw the deaths of Elvis Presley, Groucho & Gummo Marx, Charlie Chaplin and Howard Hawks…)

    Oh, God!

    The story is cute and covertly subversive. Not only were they able to talk about God in a feature film, they managed to get across huge section of preaching disguised as dialogue. George Burns is a real Trojan Horse – when he delivers the message, people listen…

    Aside from Burns, it’s a bizarre cast. First off, John Denver is just not a lead actor. I like his everyman appeal and everything, but it seems as though every single line of dialogue is shouted. Terri Garr is well cast as his put-upon wife, or maybe I just love Terri Garr too much to be objective.

    But the supporting roles: Donald Pleasence, Dinah Shore, and Paul Sorvino as a bible-thumping televangelist – it’s truly odd stuff. Barnard Hughes is a judge for goodness sake – that’s how stodgy it is…

    Oh, God!

    I know it’s a cute little comedy and everything, but if God were to come to Earth and try to convince a courtroom full of people of his existence, I have a hard time believing he’d use card tricks. This movie came out five months after Star Wars – that’s just not going to get her done…

    Oh, God! is a fun little picture. At 98 minutes it’s far too long to hold the attention of modern filmgoers. It was probably too long even then – the thing really creeps along considering how few actual events are pictured. But if you can slow yourself down and make time for it, Oh, God! really is a clever little film. It’s not as entertaining maybe as the sequels (to my eye), but there’s some really good dialogue. Recommended…

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Fail

    The Representation Test Score: C (5 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    Oh, God! Representation Test
    [schema type=”movie” name=”Oh, God!” description=”When God appears to an assistant grocery manager as a good natured old man, the Almighty selects him as his messenger for the modern world.” director=”Carl Reiner” producer=”Jerry Weintraub” actor_1=”George Burns”]

    Main Cast John Denver Jerry Landers
    George Burns God
    Teri Garr Bobbie Landers
    Donald Pleasence Doctor Harmon
    Rating PG
    Release Date Fri 07 Oct 1977 UTC
    Director Carl Reiner
    Genres Comedy, Fantasy
    Plot When God appears to an assistant grocery manager as a good natured old man, the Almighty selects him as his messenger for the modern world.
    Poster Oh, God!
    Runtime 98
    Tagline “It’s true. People have trouble remembering My Words. Moses had such a bad memory I had to give him tablets.”
    Writers Larry Gelbart (screenplay), Avery Corman (based on the novel by)
    Year 1977
  • Ashanti (1979)

    Ashanti (1979)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    Not nearly as crappy as it looks, this 1979 star-packed anti-slavery film could have actually been a good picture with a little more care…

    Ashanti

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of Ashanti:

    A tale of modern day slavery (well, 1979 modern day). Don’t know how I’ve never heard of this before now. Starring Michael Caine, Peter Ustinov, Omar Sharif, Rex Harrison AND William Holden!

    The film is based on the novel Ebano by Alberto Vázquez-Figueroa, which was itself based on a true story. Directed by Richard Fleisher, Ashanti is an absolutely horrific tale that doesn’t shy away from the most distasteful aspects of the sickening world of slavery.

    Ashanti

    Caine and model turned actress Beverly Johnson play Doctors David & Anansa Linderby who work for the World Health Organization (WHO) providing care in West Africa. When Anansa is kidnapped by slavers, David must traverse the continent to try and get her back before the party crosses the Red Sea.

    It’s really great to see well-seasoned vets like Holden and Harrison. With their names in the credits I somewhat expected them to stick out like out-of-place cameos, but these are real (if small) parts. Ustinov is very interesting as the slaver Suleiman; it’s the first villain role in his entire career.

    Ashanti

    Michael Caine’s character is so bizarre. Out in a strange land where he doesn’t speak the language, know the customs or have any resources, he is deeply mistrustful and hostile to the few people who offer assistance. I get the lack of trust, his wife has just been kidnapped after all, but why is he pushing away the only people who want to help?

    Good looking picture; well-shot, beautiful country. (Filmed in Kenya, Israel & Sicily.) Also well-shot ugliness at times. The seventies music is a drag, though, really making the project feel low-rent…

    Ashanti

    Things take a really weird turn past the one hour mark when one of the slaves proves himself to be a witch doctor. Truly bizarre and completely atonal considering the grounded quality of everything up to that point…

    Kabir Bedi as Malik, a wronged husband and father seeking revenge on Sulieman has a wonderful intensity.

    Ashanti

    Even with Caine doing his version of phoning it in, he still burns with an intensity in many scenes. He’s such a fine actor that when he coasts he’s still leaving many others in the dust. Unfortunately I suspect he knows this. Caine has disowned this picture, shamelessly admitting that it was a paycheck project that he has no love for. Firstly, I resent actors pulling that crap; you took the job, you took the money, it’s bad form to deride the project. A lot of people work hard on even the world’s worst films. It’s insulting and disrespectful to their efforts to run down the picture just because you’ve moved on. I’m a firm believer that when you take on a job you have a responsibility to give it your best effort and far more importantly your best intentions. The producers aren’t simply paying you to show up and act – I believe there is a duty to try to make the picture work beyond your time in front of the lens. You should take your part in promoting the work; speak well of the film, or at least speak no evil. And even if you think you are above the project, don’t let it show.

    Ashanti

    Omar Sharif is such a great actor that they had to bulk up the part for him. I’m not complaining, particularly, as he’s always great to watch, but it does add a sort of unusual turning in the last 15 minutes of the picture.

    The ending, with things tied up so neatly, is so pat and unsatisfying it nearly made me go back and remove anything positive I said about the rest of the film. The feel of the final shots is completely disrespectful to all of the characters who suffered and died in the story.

    Ashanti

    Despite the poster, Ashanti is not actually an exploitation picture. It doesn’t deal in casual, cruel violence, sexual or otherwise. There is casual, cruel violence, and there are definite trigger points for victims of abuse, but it is never glorified or presented in an voyeuristic or exploitative manner. This movie deals with hard truths and doesn’t flinch from showing them, but no more so than a documentary on the same subject – never for entertainment value or as a storytelling tool.

    Ashanti is an interesting film. Very uneven, but there are some really interesting moments. Some of the chases through the Sahara are very fine. With some more work this truly could have been a good picture.

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Fail

    The Representation Test Score: C (4 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    Ashanti Representation Test
    [schema type=”movie” name=”Ashanti” description=”Dr. Anansa Linderby is kidnapped in a medical mission in Africa by a slave trader. From this moment, her husband will do anything to recover her and to punish the bad guys, but that will be not an easy task.” director=”Richard Fleisher” actor_1=”Michael Caine” ]

    Main Cast Michael Caine Dr. David Linderby
    Peter Ustinov Suleiman
    Kabir Bedi Malik
    Beverly Johnson Dr. Anansa Linderby
    Rating R
    Release Date Sun 01 Apr 1979 UTC
    Director Richard Fleischer
    Genres Action, Adventure, Drama, Mystery, Thriller
    Plot Dr. Anansa Linderby is kidnapped in a medical mission in Africa by a slave trader. From this moment, her husband will do anything to recover her and to punish the bad guys, but that will be not an easy task.
    Poster Ashanti
    Runtime 118
    Tagline Slave trading lives today!
    Writers Stephen Geller (screenplay), Alberto Vázquez Figueroa (as Alberto Vasquez-Figueroa) (novel)
    Year 1979
  • Mad Max (1979)

    Mad Max (1979)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    What was a bold, unique action film may now seem very tame and slow, but the original film is still crucial in understanding the character.

    Mad Max

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of Mad Max:

    Even though I’ve seen the sequels many times, this is actually only my third or fourth time watching the original Mad Max. I know it’s a classic and everything, but there really is no going back after The Road Warrior. If I saw this first I know it would have been so much more meaningful.

    Mad Max

    I vividly the first time I saw Mad Max. A bunch of us were at our friend Dave’s house – where we played RPGs like Dungeons & Dragons and Call of Cthulhu, listened to tons of heavy metal and watched dozens of oddball sci-fi pictures. It was where I first saw Bad Taste, Highlander and bootlegged copies of movies like the Dolph Lundgren Punisher that wouldn’t get released in the States. In some ways, Mad Max was just another in a long line of quirky foreign films.

    Mad Max

    Mad Max is a good movie right up until the moment you see The Road Warrior. After that, there’s really no point watching the original, save for possible nostalgia.

    Mad Max

    It’s a brutal, 1970’s style film. Simultaneously, it’s a low budget picture and feels like it. Mad Max is more of a good idea for a movie than a movie in of itself. It’s like a demo; unique and possessing qualities the finished product doesn’t have, but still clearly undercooked.

    Mad Max

    As revenge pictures go, it’s not much of one, though I realize it’s 1979. Still, this is hardly Peckinpah material. Max doesn’t actually pursue anyone in revenge until 15 minutes before the end of the film and frankly, his payback is neither grisly or particularly scary. In point of fact, the most engaged he gets with a criminal is at the climax of the film, and it isn’t even with the leader of the gang. In other words, the main villain isn’t the main villain…

    Mad Max

    The suspense level is pretty high for so little actual action, which isn’t really a bad thing, just surprising seeing where these films would shortly go.

    Mad Max

    Visually the film is fabulous – truly unique. It’s as bleak and desolate as the future the story depicts. I love that all they needed to do to depict a world bereft of law, order and hope was go to a remote area in Australia. I find that terribly amusing…

    Mad Max

    In regards to the acting, the best you can say is that it’s easy to understand why Mel Gibson would soon be a star. He is charismatic.

    The music is truly awful – so melodramatic.

    Mad Max

    Mad Max is a good movie. I don’t wish it to seem as though I don’t like it. It’s a great start to what would prove to be a franchise, and it is utterly remarkable what director George Miller & producer Byron Kennedy were able to achieve with so little resources. The fact that Mad Max 2: The Road Warrior would shortly make the original Mad Max seem underdone by comparison shouldn’t reflect negatively on a very good, original film. (It sort of does, though…)

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Fail

    The Representation Test Score: D (1 pt)

    Mad Max Representation Test

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    [schema type=”movie” url=”http://www.madmaxonline.com/” name=”Mad Max” description=”In a self-destructing world, a vengeful Australian policeman sets out to stop a violent motorcycle gang.” director=”George Miller” producer=”Byron Kennedy” actor_1=”Mel Gibson” ]

    Main Cast Mel Gibson Max
    Joanne Samuel Jessie
    Hugh Keays-Byrne Toecutter
    Steve Bisley Jim Goose
    Rating R
    Release Date Thu 12 Apr 1979 UTC
    Director George Miller
    Genres Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi, Thriller
    Plot In a self-destructing world, a vengeful Australian policeman sets out to stop a violent motorcycle gang.
    Poster Mad Max
    Runtime 93
    Tagline He rules the roads.
    Writers James McCausland (screenplay) &, George Miller (screenplay)
    Year 1979
  • Welcome to Me (2015)

    Welcome to Me (2015)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    Gutsy character study by Kristen Wiig, who gives her most nuanced performance yet. Story doesn’t quite fill its run-time, but not a problem.

    Welcome to Me

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of Welcome to Me:

    Kristen Wiig is clearly someone we’re going to have to watch very closely over the next few years. She’s always been a comic superheroine, but she has been taking on increasingly gutsy roles and just keeps upping her game.

    Much as the title suggests, Welcome to Me is essentially a one-woman show, in which Wiig brings to life the complicated character Alice Klieg. Alice suffers from borderline personality disorder, a condition worsened when she stops taking her medication after winning the lottery. Alice has for years been obsessed with Oprah Winfrey, and her new found riches allow her to indulge her desire to host her own Oprah-style TV show.

    Welcome to Me

    This unlikely tale isn’t really that far-fetched and the subject of fame-seeking narcissists is far from virgin territory. What makes Welcome to Me unique is the low wattage of fame’s klieg lights. (The character’s name is almost certainly a nerdy screenwriting pun.) In correctly picking all of the lottery numbers, Alice has won a tremendous amount of money, $86 million, yet only courts fame after a chance opportunity to come up on stage during the filming of a low-budget infomercial. Her money can commandeer the entire struggling infomercial production company, whose principals cannot afford to veto any of her outlandish demands.

    Welcome to Me

    Welcome to Me distinguishes itself from other tales of lottery winners with its frank portrayal of a member of the noveau riche who isn’t being exploited by anyone. Wiig’s take on Klieg is wholly original, as is the character. Klieg isn’t seduced by the money, or letting it change her; she’s making her wealth work for her and create the opportunity to be exactly what she wants to be. It’s the people around her who have to toe the line of enabling Alice and exploiting her.

    Welcome to Me

    The supporting staff is marvelous, led by Rich (James Marsden) & Gabe Ruskin (Wes Bentley) as the brotherly team that own the company that becomes the launching pad for Alice’s two-hour show about herself – “Welcome to Me”. The show staff includes sympathetic director Dawn Hurley, typically well-played by Joan Cusack, and a blink-and-you’ll-miss-her Jennifer Jason Leigh as a disapproving set designer. Tim Robbins also has a great part as Alice’s therapist, Dr. Moffat. Alan Tudyk even drops by for a small but fun part.

    The finest supporting part, though, is that of Alice’s best friend Gina, brought to life by the excellent Linda Cardellini. Gina isn’t swayed or jealous by her friend’s new fortune or fame; she’s eternally vigilant of her friend’s safety and best interests in what must be a very difficult friendship. Gina is a uniquely consistent character.

    Welcome to Me

    Because the only real trouble with Welcome to Me is that it somewhat puts you in the role of Gina, feeling protective of Alice. The movie is very entertaining and funny, but while Alice is a remarkably self-assured character in many ways, she is a troubled person, struggling with a serious disorder, and it’s not always clear if the picture is laughing with her. There’s an unsettling feeling at times that the outlandish and bizarre situations are coming at the expense of the protagonist and that we are perhaps being encouraged to laugh at the “weird” person.

    It is this last uncomfortable feeling that keeps Welcome to Me from becoming something more than the amusing black comedy that it is. The writing from Eliot Laurence is smart, the direction from Shira Piven solid, but I can’t wholeheartedly recommend the film. Welcome to Me is entirely worth a watch, particularly for Kristen Wiig’s performance, but the weak third act and the sensation of unease keep it from being truly great.

    Welcome to Me

    Note: Welcome to Me was screened as a festival selection in the fall of 2014, before hitting extremely limited release on May 1, 2015. It is the first theatrical film to be released to library patrons via the Hoopla service at the same time as theaters. This may leave you with the impression that the studio is cutting bait. Sadly, I believe this to be exactly the case…

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Pass

    The Representation Test Score: A (11 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    Welcome to Me Representation Test

    [schema type=”movie” url=”http://www.welcometomemovie.com/” name=”Welcome to Me” description=”A woman with borderline personality disorder (Kristen Wiig) wins the Mega-Millions and—much to the dismay of her parents, therapist, gay ex-husband and local TV station—uses the winnings to fund her lifelong dream of becoming the next Oprah.

    “Alice is going to be on TV whether you like it or not.”” director=”Shira Piven” actor_1=”Kristen Wiig” ]

    Main Cast Kristen Wiig Alice Klieg
    James Marsden Rich Ruskin
    Linda Cardellini Gina Selway
    Wes Bentley Gabe Ruskin
    Rating R
    Release Date Fri 01 May 2015 UTC
    Director Shira Piven
    Genres Comedy, Drama
    Plot When Alice Klieg wins the Mega-Millions lottery, she immediately quits her psychiatric meds and buys her own talk show.
    Poster Welcome to Me
    Runtime 87
    Tagline Alice is going to be on TV whether you like it or not
    Writers Eliot Laurence (screenplay)
    Year 2014
  • Tomorrowland (2015)

    Tomorrowland (2015)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    I don’t know what movie all those other reviewers were watching, but the one I saw was a smart, good-hearted, gorgeous family-friendly film.

    tomorrowland_still5

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of Tomorrowland:

    You almost got me. I’m susceptible to buzz and hype at least as much as the next guy, and the poor reviews almost convinced me not to go see Tomorrowland. Despite all of the previews looking great, despite the guiding hand of Brad Bird, despite the intriguing premise, I nearly skipped it. Just because everyone seemed to hate it. Shame on me. I should know better.

    Tomorrowland

    Co-produced and co-written by Damon Lindelhof and director Brad Bird (based on a story by Lindelhof, Bird and long-time EW film critic Jeff Jensen), Tomorrowland is a science-fiction film that dares to be an original story. That may be the most revolutionary thing about it in 2015. It isn’t a sequel or a reboot (though it does have a minor tie-in/brand recognition with the Disney theme parks).

    More than anything, it shares a sensibility with the dreams and ideals of Walt Disney himself. In this way it echoes the excellent and underrated 2007 CG-animated Disney film, Meet the Robinsons, and its borrowed from Walt motto “keep moving forward”.

    Tomorrowland

    Tomorrowland celebrates dreamers and curiosity and will probably be ridiculed for its earnestness and naivete. Oh well. There’s nothing wrong with trying hard to do something unique and inspirational. If your work comes off as cloying and saccharine, well, maybe you have a little work to do on your screenwriting. But if it simply is criticized by the jaded for well-meaning sincerity, I think you have to take that in stride.

    Tomorrowland

    One of the reasons I enjoyed the picture so much may be that I’d avoided learning too much about it ahead of time. The couple of teasers I saw were enough to pique my interest, but I didn’t even see the trailers that gave away too much. I didn’t even know Hugh Laurie was in the film. When compiling the assets for this review, I found trailers that included shots of practically all the twists of the picture, including one uninterrupted chase scene that was one of the films highlights. Stop giving away so much in trailers, people!

    Tomorrowland

    In the acting department, George Clooney is great at world-weary, so it comes across perfectly here, even if he’s a little less convincing as a former idealist. Despite the star-friendly billing, Britt Robertson as dreamer/doer Casey Newton is the real lead of the film, and she’s quite good. Most of the scenes are stolen, however, by tween actor Raffey Cassidy, who is marvelous as the mysterious Athena. Hugh Laurie is his usual wonderfully cranky self. Oh, and Keegan-Michael Key popped up, which always makes me happy!

    Tomorrowland

    The look of the film is wonderful; both the production design (Scott Chambliss) and the cinematography (Claudio Miranda). The effects are great, even if the whole picture somewhat screams CGI. Not always a bad thing, plus I really like the futuristic designs. It’s 2015, so of course the color timing is ridiculously excessive, but everyone is guilty of that now. The music by Michael Giacchino is also lovely – the theme was in my head for the rest of the day.

    Tomorrowland

    Mostly, though, the story just plays. It is well-written and enjoyable, it doesn’t pander or needlessly scare kids. It is a solid PG, which is noteworthy in of itself. The film was made to watch with the whole family and to be enjoyed by all ages. Often that sounds like a curse on the lines of “may you live in interesting times”, but despite the knee-jerk reaction you may have, the phrase family-friendly is not actually supposed to equal low-quality film-making.

    Tomorrowland is an excellent film. My family and I loved it without qualification. Take your kids and go see it. And if you don’t have kids, you were one once, right? Tomorrowland is an old-school adventure film in the spirit of the 1980’s. Or the 1970’s. Or any age in which kids looked to the sky and dreamed…

    Tomorrowland
    Update June 22, 2015:

    You know, when I wrote my review of Tomorrowland, I was so focused on refuting the negative press on it that I think I may have come off as a little defensive. More importantly, I spent so much time on why it wasn’t bad, I’m not sure I adequately pointed out why it was so good. The biggest thing I missed on (somewhat ironically, considering the pro-female message I hope to impart with my little ramblings) was what a female positive film it is. I freely admit I took it for granted before reading a very well-written post by Reel Girl Margot Magowan. It was a lightbulb moment for me. The stars of the picture are two wonderfully strong, complex and detailed females who are allowed to be fully realized characters with all of the traits of complete human experience. How did I not draw attention to this point? I guess the positivity of the film got to me and I momentarily let myself believe that we live in a world where I shouldn’t have to note the atypical characterization; for once I just assumed that prominently featuring one half of the human race in a positive light shouldn’t need to be regarded as a novelty or even praiseworthy, but expected. Alas, I’m pining for Tomorrowland, too…

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Pass

    The Representation Test Score: B (10 pts)

    Tomorrowland Representation Test

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    [schema type=”movie” url=”http://movies.disney.com/tomorrowland/” name=”Tomorrowland” description=”Bound by a shared destiny, a teen bursting with scientific curiosity and a former boy-genius inventor embark on a mission to unearth the secrets of a place somewhere in time and space that exists in their collective memory.” director=”Brad Bird” actor_1=”George Clooney” ]

    Main Cast George Clooney Frank Walker
    Britt Robertson Casey Newton
    Hugh Laurie Nix
    Raffey Cassidy Athena
    Rating PG
    Release Date Fri 22 May 2015 UTC
    Director Brad Bird
    Genres Action, Adventure, Mystery, Sci-Fi
    Plot Bound by a shared destiny, a teen bursting with scientific curiosity and a former boy-genius inventor embark on a mission to unearth the secrets of a place somewhere in time and space that exists in their collective memory.
    Poster Tomorrowland
    Runtime 130
    Tagline
    Writers Damon Lindelof (screenplay) and, Brad Bird (screenplay) …
    Year 2015