Category: Music

  • Amadeus (1984)

    Amadeus (1984)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    Peter Shaffer brilliantly adapts his own play, Director Miloš Forman delivers a masterpiece. 30 years later still one of the best ever made.

    Amadeus

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of Amadeus:

    In 1984, after a summer of blockbusters and in the middle of an age obsessed with synthesizers, video games, computers, electronics and everything “new”, producer Saul Zaentz presented a two and a half hour movie about classical music composers that had been dead for almost two hundred years. That takes some nerve…

    It helps that the film in question would be based on a successful play and was being written for the screen by the playwright, Peter Shaffer. Amadeus would also be directed by Miloš Forman, an accomplished and challenging filmmaker both in his native country (the former Czechoslovakia) and throughout the world. It was still a big risk, however.

    Amadeus

    Zaentz’s gamble paid off big, bringing in well over twice its budget and winning 8 Oscars including Best Picture. More importantly it is a tremendous movie that plays exactly as well as it did 30 years ago today.

    The quality of the filmmakers is on display almost immediately, as the story opens with an aged Antonio Salieri (F. Murray Abraham in his greatest role) shouting his confession that he killed Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, begging for forgiveness as he cuts open his throat. What a grabber! You can practically hear those who were dragged to the movie theater whispering admiringly to their spouses, “Whoa! I thought this was going to be boring music and people in wigs?”

    Amadeus

    The premise of the play and film is at once wonderful writing and complete nonsense. Salieri did not kill Mozart, he did not suggest that he killed Mozart, no serious people think that he killed Mozart. According to scholars of the men, the two may have had some rivalry between them, but nothing suggests the level of disrespect or hatred shown here. They were both competing for work and the favor of Emperor Joseph II, but there is plenty of correspondence signifying that they were respectful colleagues. It is true that Mozart complained in his lifetime that Salieri was more at favor and trying to obstruct his career, but this seems to be mostly based on Mozart’s complaints against the Italians in general, and there are other letters from Mozart implying a friendship.

    What I didn’t realize before doing research for this review is that Shaffer’s play is actually based on a tragedy called Mozart and Salieri by Alexander Pushkin that was staged only six years after Salieri’s death. Rimsky-Korsakov would adapt it into an opera at the turn of the century. It was here that the apocryphal tale that Salieri, filled with jealousy at the musical superiority of an “idle” man, poisoned Mozart were first aired. So there were rumors, but none that were taken seriously. What we really have here is a clever writer taking a fascinating bit of history and fictionalizing it dramatically to make for an entertaining tale about genius and jealousy.

    Amadeus

    The story is set in 1823, when Salieri, recovering in an insane asylum from his suicide attempt, narrates his tale to a priest who has come for his confession. The film plays out over a number of years through flashbacks, but mainly focuses on the ten year period from 1781-91 in which Salieri and Mozart were colleagues in Vienna.

    The story is captivating, with whip-smart dialogue and a brilliant narrative that, along with Forman’s expert direction, leads to an engrossing picture whose pace is more engaging than a 153-minute movie has any right to be. The tale ebbs and flows and there’s a diversity of scenes and emotions that make the film always seem fresh and never long.

    Amadeus

    The acting, of course, is wonderful. Abraham delivers a best in show performance as Salieri, with a range of emotion and subtlety that is a perfect match with the complex score. Tom Hulce is charismatic and mesmerizing as Mozart, greatly humanizing such a legendary figure. Both were nominated for Best Actor and while Abraham justly was awarded the statue, I feel Hulce was robbed by not being classified as Supporting Actor.

    Amadeus

    Elizabeth Berridge put in a great performance as Mozart’s wife Constanze, though a lot of her work was left on the cutting room floor. (Restored with the 2002 Director’s Cut.) All of the supporting players are excellent, with Jeffrey Jones’ humorous turn as Emperor Joseph II standing out. Also exceptional is Simon Callow, who played Mozart in the original London production, as Emanuel Schikaneder, Mozart’s friend and author of the libretto for The Magic Flute.

    It’s a quality production in all respects. The score is predictably brilliant, the costumes, makeup and art direction are award-winning and it’s really just a gorgeous picture. Forman invited choreography legend Twyla Tharp to work her magic on the picture. They had previously collaborated on Hair & Ragtime.

    Amadeus

    Amadeus is a captivating story and an amazing film. Enjoy it often…

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Fail

    The Representation Test Score: C (5 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    Amadeus Representation Test[schema type=”movie” name=”Amadeus” description=”The incredible story of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, told by his peer and secret rival Antonio Salieri – now confined to an insane asylum.” director=”Milos Forman” actor_1=”F. Murray Abraham” actor_2=”Tom Hulce” actor_3=”Elizabeth Berridge”]

    Main Cast F. Murray Abraham Antonio Salieri, Tom Hulce Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, Elizabeth Berridge Constanze Mozart, Roy Dotrice Leopold Mozart
    Rating PG
    Release Date Wed 19 Sep 1984 UTC
    Director Milos Forman
    Genres Biography, Drama, Music
    Plot The incredible story of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, told by his peer and secret rival Antonio Salieri – now confined to an insane asylum.
    Poster Amadeus
    Runtime 160
    Tagline Amadeus. The man. The music. The magic. The madness. The murder. The mystery. The motion picture.
    Writers Peter Shaffer (original stage play), Peter Shaffer (original screenplay)
    Year 1984
  • Now Very Bass: NVB No.01 Nikki Sixx (Mötley Crüe, Sixx:A.M.)

    Now Very Bass: NVB No.01 Nikki Sixx (Mötley Crüe, Sixx:A.M.)

    Despite this site being comprised primarily of movie reviews, it initially was to feature music reviews and appreciation. The name of this website, Now Very Bad, is actually taken from a musician joke*.

    I hope to expand on the musical focus of this site, and I’m starting right now with the first in a series on bass players: Now Very Bass. (Bass is my chosen instrument…)

    To kick off the series, I’m going to spotlight a bassist who is currently on his Final Tour with the band that made him famous and is one of my first influences: Nikki Sixx.

    Now Very Bass: NVB#01 Nikki Sixx (Mötley Crüe, Sixx:A.M.)

    From their start in the early 1980’s, Motley Crue was one of the loudest, hardest rock bands around. A large part of the driving rhythm of the band was provided by bassist Nikki Sixx. Of course, in the early days, Sixx attracted attention more for his on-stage antics, such as lighting himself on fire, than for his fretwork. And while the showmanship continues to be a huge part of the stage show over thirty years later, the same solid rhythm section that holds the band together today was already evident on the early records.

    Sixx’s playing style is similar to many hard rock bassists of the time, known for being more sturdy than flashy. Mostly lives in the groove with a fairly typical hard rock / metal focus on pumping the root. It helps that his partner is one of the finest rock drummers out there, Tommy Lee. Like AC/DC before them, the simplicity of the music on paper can lead to the impression that anyone can play it. Sure, you can hit all the notes, but that driving beat is a deceptively difficult thing to do well. Anyone who has been in a new band can attest to that.

    The self-produced debut album, Too Fast For Love, released in November 1981, may be more notable for Sixx’s writing than his bass playing. Sixx has always been a songwriter first, probably part of the selfless commitment to the songs over any showy playing. The record is rough around the edges, even after being remixed by Roy Thomas Baker, but the raw energy of the songs makes it a classic. Check out Live Wire, Public Enemy #1 or the title track.


    For the band’s second album, Shout At The Devil, the songwriting is improved and the overall sound is far more polished. Shout is one of the best metal albums of all time, as Sixx really came into his own as a songwriter. The bass playing is typically solid if not particularly noteworthy. During these early records he generally used B.C. Rich Warlock & Mockingbird basses.

    The time changes of the Theatre of Pain opener City Boy Blues are maybe a signal of some new styles creeping in with the band’s sound and complexity. Sadly, the bands extracurricular activities likely held them back from exploring any further, but the band tries out some interestingly classic rock/country tones on Raise Your Hands To Rock.

    For the cover of Brownsville Station’s Smokin’ in the Boys Room, Sixx employs some distinctive sliding octaves on the verses. This is also the first time he uses an 8-string bass to fill out the sound. It is very effective, and I have always been surprised he didn’t use 8 & 12 strings more live, particularly as he switched to Hamer basses at this time, and Hamer has a long history with those instruments.

    The album’s highlight, of course, is Home Sweet Home. The sonic field is altered significantly with the piano introduction, and there is some smooth movement of the bass line against the guitar solo.

    Due to lifestyle decisions and priorities at the time, the 4th record, Girls, Girls, Girls, finds the band treading water a bit. There are some great tracks, but there’s more than a little bit of filler. The title track and the opener, Wild Side, are classics, finding Sixx keeping up with Mick Mars at his sleaziest. The record is a bit uneven but the high points are among the band’s best. The lyrical high point has to be Dancing on Glass, with Sixx getting his junkie poetry on.

    The most interesting contribution by Sixx to the album, however, features no bass at all. The mostly instrumental piece Nona was written by Sixx for his grandmother and clocks in at less than 90 seconds, but it’s a beautiful piece with strings and offers a never to be repeated taste of a more mature direction for the Crue.

    Crue went with a totally new approach on the follow-up, their first sober album, Dr. Feelgood. They severed ties with Tom Werner, producer of their past three albums and went with the bombastic Bob Rock. Rock would produce Feelgood and the follow-up album in addition to all of the new material for the various compilations the band would put out for the next 15 years. The record sounds huge and the bass is more upfront than in any previous recording.

    The title track explodes with what I believe to be their first use of the Drop D tuning, and the chugging rhythm of the intro shows some very precise picking and great low-end. The guitars and basses are generally tuned down a half-step on all of the Motley albums, but the low D really sets the tone for what many consider their best album.

    Contrast this with the bluesy approach to Don’t Go Away Mad (Just Go Away), which sees Sixx filling in the verses with a very complementary approach.

    Sixx used Spector basses on both Girls & Feelgood, particularly Gibson Thunderbird-inspired Spectorbirds, but started to utilize some classic P-basses and would soon switch to Gibson Thunderbirds or Thunderbird variations by Ernie Ball & Schecter for the remainder of his career.

    The band added three new tracks for the semi-greatest hits album Decade of Decadence, most notable of these being the single Primal Scream, with a very riff-heavy bass line.

    But the record also collected some songs recorded for compilation albums, beginning a trend of releasing some of their finest and most challenging pieces on non-album releases. (Decade of Decadence has since gone out of print, with most of the “extra” tunes included on Supersonic And Demonic Relics.) Rock N’ Roll Junkie may have been a fairly straightforward song for a truly terrible movie (The Adventures of Ford Fairlane), but the bass is fantastic with a great groove.

    Most outstanding is the cover of Tommy Bolin’s Teaser. The song is absolutely perfect for the band and for Sixx’s playing. It was recorded for the Stairway to Heaven / Highway to Hell compilation for the 1989 Moscow Music Peace Festival (It’s a very interesting record, with then current artists performing at the festival – strong-armed by manager Doc McGhee – covering songs by artists who had died from substance abuse.) Sixx had been very vocal about his admiration for Bolin in the rock mags of the day, which was certainly influential in Geffen releasing a 2-cd box set, The Ultimate… in 1989. (I know Sixx’s endorsement was the reason I checked out Tommy Bolin, for which I am eternally grateful.)

    After the monster success of Feelgood, the band separated with singer Vince Neil and enlisted singer/guitarist John Corabi for the hugely underrated self-titled 1994 album, Mötley Crüe. While the album was a commercial failure, I consider it an artistic success. The band really challenged themselves with this one and I believe it is the first album in their career that is actually well-rounded. Even their greatest efforts before this had contained some amount of filler, and picking the greatest hits from the early albums is easy. And that may have been part of the real problem with the album – there’s no real single. Hooligan’s Holiday may have been a poor choice of single – it’s far from the best song on the album – but I’m not really sure what they’d have used instead.

    The record has a great bass sound, with lots of moving parts and some experimentation with distortion and other bass effects. The two guitar approach also leads to some interesting things. It is unfortunate that the times had changed and the landscape didn’t favor this music.

    In their tell-all book, The Dirt, everyone involved with the project has bitter and unpleasant memories about the follow-up album, Generation Swine, which I think is unfortunate, as I love the album. In some ways it’s one of my favorites. I get why they don’t like it – it’s schizophrenic, having started off as a Corabi album and ending up with Vince Neil back. There are too many cooks and everyone is doing what they want, but it makes for an interesting album – there are some great songs on here. I would have loved to have heard this with Corabi’s vocals – maybe his tenure with the band would be more fondly recalled.

    From a bass standpoint, it’s easily Sixx’s most experimental and exciting record. In addition to handling some of the lead vocals, there’s a lot of use of distortion and effects and different recording styles. The single Afraid starts with strummed bass chords as the main riff and it’s a great sound. On the tour Sixx brought out both Epiphone 5 strings and 12-strings from Hiroshigi Kids Guitar Company.

    He would also use 5 string basses on Enslaved & Bitter Pill, two new songs for 1998’s Greatest Hits.

    After touring in support of the Greatest Hits record, Lee would leave the band and be replaced for 2000’s New Tattoo. There is a real difference in that groove on the Mike Clink-produced album without Lee. Replacement drummer Randy Castillo (RIP) was a very fine drummer, but there is an ingredient x missing. He and Sixx hold down the rhythm, but there is very little groove and none of Lee’s creative embellishments. I never realized how good Lee was until I heard Crue without him. I’m no drummer, so I can’t even point to exactly what it is that he adds. He’s a seriously hard hitter, and tends to use the bass drum a lot and/or tune his drums a bit deeper to add to the “bass” of the band.

    This period is significant largely as the time in which Sixx was collaborating with other artists, including a significant songwriting partnership with James Michael. Michael has co-writing credit on 6 of the 10 originals on New Tattoo, as well as 2 of the 3 new original tunes on the 2005 compilation Red, White and Crüe. [Sick Love Song & the Japanese-only release I’m a Liar (and That’s the Truth)]. Note: The 3rd was also a Sixx collaboration – with band Simple Plan.

    James Michael would soon collaborate with Sixx on a more permanent basis in their new band Sixx:A.M. in 2006. They have released two studio albums to date with a third to be released in October 2014.

    The final Crue album, Saints of Los Angeles, was released in 2008 and featured the original lineup. The title track is classic Crue and the album is very solid. James Michael took on the producer role for the project and the bass never sounded better. Every song on the album was written by the Sixx:A.M. members and Marti Frederiksen with a few co-writing credits from Mick Mars and one from Tommy Lee.

    The latest (and last?) Crue song, All Bad Things Must Come To An End is currently being played on their Final Tour and is featured in the promo video below:

    Nikki Sixx has provided the pulse of one of the biggest rock bands in history and redefined the role of the bass player in the band. His songwriting has made him a central figure in the rock landscape and inspired countless musicians.

    *Joke has been told many times over the years, but goes (roughly) as follows:

    A party of explorers are travelling through the jungle when they hear a steady, rhythmic drumming. Curious, they ask their guide what the drumming is about. The guide replies, “When drums stop, very bad.”

    They continue their trek but the drums keep pounding away; again they inquire about the sound and are again told, “When drums stop, very bad.”

    They press on, nearly driven mad by the incessant drumming, when suddenly the pounding stops. The explorers are surprised and look expectantly to the guide who says, “Now very bad…now bass solo.”

    [schema type=”person” name=”Nikki Sixx” orgname=”Mötley Crüe” url=”http://www.motley.com” ]

  • Purple Rain (1984)

    Purple Rain (1984)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    How do you judge Purple Rain? The music is a contender for greatest soundtrack of all time. The movie’s dreadfully boring, pretentious mess.

    Purple Rain

    Movie Review of Purple Rain:

    I’m a huge fan of listening to movie scores and soundtracks, but I recognize that there’s a real danger to listening to a film’s soundtrack before seeing the movie. Instead of the music easing you further into the story, the recognition factor pulls you out of the moment. This may be less the case with musicals but it still is jarring.

    Purple Rain In the case of Purple Rain, which is really just a long-form music video, the original audiences for the film probably experienced this to a much smaller degree, as the soundtrack album dropped only days before the film’s release. (Although the single “When Doves Cry” had been out for months.) For me, seeing this movie for the first time after listening to the soundtrack for 30 years, it was hard to get past. I was even more impatient during the filler story scenes than I perhaps would have been otherwise.

    Purple Rain In Purple Rain, Prince plays The Kid (really), an arrogant, pretentious, self-absorbed, misogynist jerk who also is a phenomenally talented songwriter and musician – he’s Prince. Oddly enough, he’s about the only person in the whole movie who doesn’t use his real name for his character. The story concerns his tumultuous family life, love life and band life during his residency at the First Avenue nightclub. His parents are abusive, so he’s abusive and completely unlikable. He also has a puppet.

    Purple Rain Everyone in the movie plays themselves, really, although I have no idea exactly how autobiographical this all is – and I don’t really care. The movie is a joyless mess, with bad pacing and worse dialogue. Absolutely no one in this movie is at all sympathetic and the non-musical scenes are slow and boring. There’s possibly a real movie in here somewhere, with the story of the abusive father, but no one involved in this production knows how to develop it.

    Purple Rain The musical performances are of course wonderful. Or at least the music is. It can be a little distracting to see Prince acting out all of his lyrics and he has a tendency to point a lot, but I accept this as a minor inconvenience and part of the aforementioned problem with knowing the soundtrack so well. You will also be subjected to two performances by The Time and an unwatchable Apollonia 6 song.

    Purple Rain When I saw the music videos played ad nauseum in 1984, I always thought it looked really funny to see Prince in his leathers and frilly shirts out by the lake. Turns out it’s even more ridiculous over the course of 111 minutes – just a guy and his heels, out in nature…

    Purple Rain Finally, although these are generally spoiler-free reviews, I have to call out the denouement of this one, in which The Kid finally accepts the input of his bandmates and performs one of their songs, thus learning…wait, Prince? Accepting someone else’s input? The ending would have been more plausible if Morris Day turned into a dragon and ate everyone.

    Purple Rain If you have somehow avoided this movie for 30 years, don’t break your streak now. Watch Sign O’ The Times

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Pass

    The Representation Test Score: C (4 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/) Purple Rain Representation Test [schema type=”movie” name=”Purple Rain” description=”A young man with a talent for music has begun a career with much promise. He meets an aspiring singer, Apollonia, and finds that talent alone isn’t all that he needs. A complicated tale of his repeating his father’s self destructive behavior, losing Apollonia to another singer (Morris Day), and his coming to grips with his own connection to other people ensues.” director=”Albert Magnoli” actor_1=”Prince” ]

    Main Cast Prince The Kid, Apollonia Kotero Apollonia, Morris Day Morris, Olga Karlatos Mother
    Rating R
    Release Date Fri 27 Jul 1984 UTC
    Director Albert Magnoli
    Genres Drama, Music, Musical, Romance
    Plot A young man with a talent for music has begun a career with much promise. He meets an aspiring singer…
    Poster Purple Rain
    Runtime 111
    Tagline
    Writers William Blinn (written by), Albert Magnoli (written by)
    Year 1984
  • Detroit Rock City (1999)

    Detroit Rock City (1999)

    #140RVW

    Ill conceived vanity project for KISS (like they have any other kind). Unambitious “wild night out” movie unfunny with unlikable characters.

    Detroit Rock City

    What’s more:

    Rock ‘n’ roll movies are seldom ever any good. Especially the ones that feature a real-life band. Only movies with fictitious bands are interesting or funny. If the film is based on a real band (and it isn’t a documentary, which can be great) the band has to have a sense of humor about themselves, which they never do.

    What about The Beatles, you say? Well, The Beatles are the exception to most rules, anyway, but even then I’d argue that the reason A Hard Day’s Night and Help! work is because they have such a great sense of humor.

    Detroit Rock City

    Treading the path forged by the equally lousy Rock ‘n’ Roll High School, Detroit Rock City follows four of the least likable burnouts in what are meant to be hilarious misadventures as they try to go see KISS at Cobo Hall in Detroit in 1978. Since KISS was involved, you can be sure that this will be humorless and brazenly self-serving , and it is.

    Detroit Rock City

    This could maybe have been something, even if the concept is so blatantly unoriginal that executives should have balked early in the pitch process. If there was a sense of humor about the time or the band or the characters, this could have been a lighthearted coming of age romp. Not something we need another of, surely, but at least that would have been enjoyable to someone. As it is, I have no idea who this movie is made for. Since it isn’t a send-up, it seems aimed solely at those who were fans in 1978. Nostalgia only gets you so far.

    Detroit Rock City

    Modern audiences may and do go see KISS when they come around for lots of reasons; some want to see what all the fuss is about, some think it’s funny, some love the timeless quality, some just like the music or the show. The band famously doesn’t care; all checks cash the same. But that doesn’t work for a movie; you aren’t seeing the spectacle, you aren’t experiencing the concert – just these four potheads going to see the concert. So it lives or dies by the actual story, and that’s not going to work – because it stinks.

    Detroit Rock City

    The screenplay was written by Carl V. Dupré, who writes straight-to-video sequels to bad horror movies like Hellraiser and The Prophecy. He is way out of his depth if he’s going to try to make the characters interesting; perhaps he didn’t even try. The effect would be the same. What’s more curious is that it is directed by Adam Rifkin, who seems to be far more successful as a writer – you’d think he’d realize there was nothing here to work with.

    KISS has always wanted us to believe that they were shocking and that people were morally outraged by their shtick.  Even when they came back in the 90’s they would insist that bible-thumping conservatives were banging the drums about the band being devil music. I never understood this and frankly never believed it for a second. They were on lunchboxes for crying out loud. These guys are the most blatant self-promoters in the history of ever and everyone can see that they were corporation first, band second. I simply refuse to believe that they were ever considered threatening by people who were not actively encouraged by raise an outcry by the band’s representatives. I’m sure some nutjobs went along for the ride – they always do. But the film tries to sing this old song again, and it’s silly.

    Detroit Rock City

    As for the performances:

    • Three of the four main actors, including Edward Furlong, lack charisma of any kind and are a chore to watch.
    • The fourth, Sam Huntington nearly makes up for the rest of them on his own. Huntington, who was only 17 here, absolutely steals the film, such as it is. Everything seems like background to him. Interestingly, ten years later he’d do the same thing in Fanboys, which is more or less the same movie but about Star Wars instead of KISS.
    • Melanie Lynskey is completely wasted as Beth, the girl next door type. (See what they did there? Because Beth is a famous KISS song. That’s how clever the writing is…)
    • Natasha Lyonne is similarly punching the clock as Christine (Sixteen? Seriously, too funny, guys…) the disco queen.
    • And then there’s KISS themselves. Twenty years have passed but we’re wearing makeup so no one can tell, right? WRONG…
    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Fail

    The Representation Test Score: D (3 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    Representation Test

    Main Cast Edward Furlong Hawk, Giuseppe Andrews Lex, James DeBello (as James De Bello) Trip, Sam Huntington Jam
    Rating R
    Release Date Fri 13 Aug 1999 UTC
    Director Adam Rifkin
    Genres Comedy, Music
    Plot A comedy about four teenagers in 1978 who try to scam their way into a KISS concert.
    Poster Detroit Rock City
    Runtime 95
    Tagline You gotta lose your mind at Detroit Rock City!
    Writers Carl V. Dupré (written by)
    Year 1999
  • A Hard Day’s Night (1964)

    A Hard Day’s Night (1964)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    The greatest rock n roll film of all time, partially cause it’s a FILM first. Didn’t need to make something this good for fans to be happy.

    A Hard Day's Night

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of A Hard Day’s Night:

    Of course you couldn’t sell this film if you pitched it: four musicians need to get to a London tv show where they are scheduled to perform but are pursued at every turn by crazed fans; hijinks ensue. But the musicians in question are The Beatles, at which point it sells itself.

    A Hard Day's Night

    And that fact makes the greatness of this movie even more impressive; it really didn’t need to be a good film to be successful. They could have put really anything out there with the band waltzing through and it would have been a hit. Instead they created one of the greatest comedies of all time.

    A Hard Day's Night

    Based on the incredible skill involved in making such a good picture, you might assume that the movie was the product of experienced filmmakers. In fact, no one from producer Walter Shenson to director Richard Lester to writer Alun Owen had more than a few credits to their name. Lester would go on to have a fabulous career but was barely known when he was hand-picked by the band based on work he did with Spike Milligan. 

    A Hard Day's Night

    In fact the only really experienced hand on the film belonged to cinematographer Gilbert Taylor – and it shows. This is a beautiful film. Just gorgeous. This is the image that current filmmakers are trying to achieve when they try their hand at black & white photography. And they will never reach it. Taylor’s other film in 1964? Dr. Strangelove

    A Hard Day's Night

    The thing most people say when seeing A Hard Day’s Night for the first time is “I didn’t realize they were so funny”. Well, yes and no. They certainly were very funny fellows, but make no mistake, this is great screenwriting. Owen tagged along with the band to get a sense of the sort of things they would say, then came up with a funny script with very Marx Brothers style dialogue. There are lots of direct quotes from the guys in there, though; they definitely had quick wits.

    A Hard Day's Night

    The biggest proof that this is a classic, though, is simply this: if you removed all of the music from the movie, it would still be incredibly entertaining. That is to say, if you took away the benefit of having the single greatest rock band of all time, you’d still have something. I think that’s pretty compelling…

    A Hard Day's Night

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Fail

    The Representation Test Score: D (2 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    A Hard Day's Night Representation Test
    [schema type=”movie” name=”A Hard Day’s Night” description=”A ‘typical’ day in the life of the Beatles, including many of their famous songs.” director=”Richard Lester” actor_1=”John Lennon” actor_2=”Paul McCartney” actor_3=”George Harrison” actor_4=”Ringo Starr”]

    Main Cast John Lennon John, Paul McCartney Paul, George Harrison George, Ringo Starr Ringo
    Rating TV-14
    Release Date Mon 06 Jul 1964 UTC
    Director Richard Lester
    Genres Comedy, Musical
    Plot A ‘typical’ day in the life of the Beatles, including many of their famous songs.
    Poster A Hard Day's Night
    Runtime 87
    Tagline The Beatles starring in their first full-length, hilarious action-packed film !
    Writers Alun Owen (original screenplay)
    Year 1964