Results may vary. I thought it was really funny, although I’ll never understand how this became a franchise. Launched Galifianakis; #result
What’s more:
This was a bit of a sleeper. It looked funny, but not that funny. Really delivered on its potential. If you like this kind of movie, of course.
The script is really good, and the dialogue funny as hell, but the actors really sell this story. There’s some really good physical acting by the three principals and a bevy of ensemble players.
I won’t be reviewing the sequels because I’d have to watch them.
Three buddies wake up from a bachelor party in Las Vegas, with no memory of the previous night and the bachelor missing. They make their way around the city in order to find their friend before his wedding.
A must watch if you are a music dork. John Cusack is the most personable actor ever born, so that helps. Funny as hell with stacked cast…
What’s more:
I have to honestly say that I didn’t really enjoy this too much when it came out. The single life was still a little too fresh in my memory and some of this movie hit a little too close to home. With time, however, I recognize this as the classic it always was.
“I’d feel guilty taking their money, if I wasn’t… well… kinda one of them.”
The story, adapted from Nick Hornby’s novel, unfolds nicely over a slightly too long run-time. The premise of recapping the “top 5” relationships mirrors the music theme perfectly and leads to great flashback scenes. The relationship talk is broken up by some of the greatest music conversations committed to film.
“Now, the making of a good compilation tape is a very subtle art. Many do’s and don’ts. First of all you’re using someone else’s poetry to express how you feel. This is a delicate thing.”
The cast is really solid, anchored by Johnny C. I’d watch him in anything, and often do. Jack Black straddles the line between hysterical and irritating (as always); he mostly wins the battle. Todd Louiso fills out the record store staff. The cameos and small parts are also fantastic, topped off by the Boss.
“Give that big final good luck and goodbye to your all time top-five and just move on down the road.”
One of those times where a film vastly surpasses the source novel, Levinson’s low-key black comedy recalls dark humor of Dr. Strangelove…
What’s more:
Not everyone likes black comedies. Sometimes they hit too close to home or offend a person’s sense of humor. Or sometimes the concept is just a little too realistic to truly be funny.
Wag the Dog could possibly be viewed in that latter category. While the movie is alternately dryly humorous and outlandishly funny, the premise is disturbingly believable: fictional war is created to divert attention from scandal.
Not the only time that a film has dealt with similar issues, but possibly the most realistic and credible example of spin doctoring on such a large scale. The book on which the film is based, “American Hero” by Larry Beinhart, is kind of a snore. Amazing concept, but all hat and no cattle. Hilary Henkin & David Mamet’s adaptation (depending on who you believe was responsible) is sublime.
The acting is predictably fabulous, making the most out of the bitingly sharp dialogue. The number of cameos is wonderful, not only because you get to see so many of these great actors, but because they flesh out some really well written characters. “The Fad King is my hero.”
May be the father of not just 1980’s coming of age stories but really all youth comedies to come. Quest to belong & find your place eternal.
What’s more:
If you haven’t seen it in a while, dust this one off; it holds up gloriously. If you’ve never seen it, you are in for a treat. Remember that it’s 1979, of course; but the lack of polish subtracts nothing.
What is really amazing is how fresh the pacing is for a movie of that era. It’s less a movie from the end of the 1970’s than it feels like the first movie of the 1980’s. Moves along at a fantastic clip; possibly even too brisk. I really wouldn’t have minded a bit more depth to some of the other Cutters.
The cycling aspects of the movie are very well done, even if you are indifferent to cycling (raises hand). The underdog sports story does what it is supposed to, and the races are very exciting. Which is all the more impressive when you consider this really isn’t a sports movie.
The interactions between these aimless friends will be familiar to anyone who saw a movie in the past 35 years. While only Dennis Christopher’s lead Dave Stoller gets significant character development time, the emotions and actions of all of the characters are allowed some room to move, and as a coming of age story it succeeds wonderfully. The humor of the teens doesn’t come against a backdrop of nincompoop adults; everyone is three dimensional. Writer Steve Tesich took home an Oscar for Best Original Screenplay.
Hollywood’s fascination with con men continues unabated & led to making this amazingly (mostly) true story. Really fun with great pacing…
What’s more:
Always a small source of surprise when Steven Spielberg does some of his best work on a relatively “normal” tale, after spending large chunk of career on supernatural blockbusters. But it is certainly evidence of his talent.
He actually had not intended to direct this film, but it languished in development hell for decades, and when it got rescheduled yet again he moved from producer to the director’s chair. You can certainly see why people tried for so long to adapt this story. Based on the autobiography of Frank Abagnale Jr., Catch Me If You Can tells the improbable but true story of a young man who posed as a pilot, doctor and lawyer while racking up millions in bank fraud, all while in his teens.
Hollywood has a long love affair with confidence men. I suspect it’s because movies are themselves the ultimate deception. Nothing is real; the entire business of motion pictures is based on trickery. So of course the actual flim-flam merchants who build the houses of cards in southern California have a particular interest in on-screen skulduggery. The stories of conjurers, shysters and practitioners of legerdemain have been fascinating audiences for decades.
The story of Abagnale is too good to resist, even if they had chosen only to focus on his real-life exploits. The story behind what drives Frank, though, and the vulnerability DiCaprio shows in his performance are what elevate this movie beyond the tale of a fascinating fraud. I’m quite sure that this is where Spielberg and screenwriter Jeff Nathanson take the most liberties with the actual account, but I’m not complaining. (And apparently neither did Abagnale.) The family dynamic that is a constant through the story is the glue that holds the tale together. Christopher Walken does some of his best work in years as Abagnale Sr.; his influence on young Frank drives the picture and provides an anchor for the more unbelievable parts of the story. The moments between DiCaprio & Walken are special.
This is only one of the two main connections on which this story is built, the second being the relationship between Frank and Tom Hanks’ federal agent Carl Hanratty. The cat & mouse connection of the two men is fascinating, even more so as the rapport builds. Hanks brings his “A”-game to what could have been a much simpler character. (The last man slated to play Hanratty before a delay forced him to abandon the role was James Gandolfini. That would have been interesting…)
Special mention should be made of the Saul Bass inspired opening credits – a thing of beauty. In fact, all of the period touches of the film are nicely handled. Great art direction, set dressing – just a reminder of how many talented people come together to make movies great. DP Janusz Kaminski his usual brilliant self.
A true story about Frank Abagnale Jr., who, before his 19th birthday, successfully conned millions of dollars’ worth of checks as a Pan Am pilot, doctor, and legal prosecutor.
