Tag: 1951

  • Alice in Wonderland (1951)

    Alice in Wonderland (1951)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    I was surprised to read that this picture wasn’t successful critically or commercially, since I’ve always loved it & held it in high regard.

    Alice In Wonderland

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of Alice in Wonderland:

    Lewis Carroll’s Alice stories are of endless fascination to audiences worldwide and so it is no surprise that they have been so often adapted for the stage and screen. Walt Disney of course adapted seemingly every known story in existence, and this very nearly became the first Disney animated feature after he had produced some Alice shorts in the late 1920’s. It was actually to have been a blend of live-action and animation, but rival studio Paramount rushed an Alice picture to market and Disney shelved the project. (It would not be the last time that the movie sat on the shelf…)

    Alice In Wonderland

    The movie took a long time to make and was Disney’s most expensive production to date. Reportedly it’s kind of a mess and an unsuccessful attempt to mix the work of multiple directors over a difficult adaptation. This is news to me, since I love the movie.

    Alice In Wonderland

    Disney’s 1951 Alice in Wonderland is my favorite version of the tale (yes, including the book). That doesn’t mean it’s the best, of course, just that it’s the one I grew up with and most closely associate with Lewis Carroll’s tale. In fact, it certainly isn’t the greatest version, as it’s more of an abridgement than an adaptation. I’m sure Carroll scholars detest Disney’s treatment of this most wonderful work, but honestly I’ve never had my hair blown back by his style of “literary nonsense” and all the hidden theological and political meanings in his writing.

    Alice In Wonderland

    So it isn’t an insightful understanding of the complexities of Carroll’s work. Guess we’ll just have to settle for it being a really fun kids movie. Maybe the picture only gets a corner of the nonsense, whimsy and absurdity of the source novel – that’s still a healthy dose for an animated movie in 1951.

    Alice In Wonderland

    At 75 minutes, it’s a short picture, typical of the time. It’s a pretty packed film for such a short runtime. Alice in Wonderland contains more songs than any other Disney picture, something you don’t really notice because many of them are very brief. The picture also includes a number of elements from the second Alice novel, Through the Looking-Glass, including one of the highlights of the picture, “The Walrus and the Carpenter”.

    Alice In Wonderland

    The film certainly was the product of many cooks, with three directors, ten directing animators, and thirteen screenwriters, not including the early draft by Aldous Huxley! Lots of stuff got left in draft form or cut, leading you to believe that the movie could have easily been twice as long. If it was a success, maybe they would have adapted the sequel.

    Alice In Wonderland

    Alas, the film fared uncharacteristically poorly for a classic Disney feature. It wasn’t a flop but if it made back its budget it could only be on paper when you consider the true costs of the lengthy development time. Unlike other Disney pictures which were re-released every 6 or 7 years, Alice wasn’t put out again by the company until 1974, although an abbreviated version of the film was shown on tv periodically. Unofficially the film was screened at universities in the late 1960’s for reasons that should be immediately apparent, causing the company to actually recall some of the existing prints from.

    Alice In Wonderland

    I love the picture – I’ve always loved it. Not all of the music works and Walt was right – Alice herself isn’t a very likeable character. But it’s the right amount of madcap fun for kids. The art direction is marvelous, making for a gorgeous film with wonderful voice acting. Possibly tame now, it’s pretty subversive for 1951, and I’ve never met anyone who didn’t enjoy it.

    Alice In Wonderland

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Pass

    The Representation Test Score: C (6 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    Alice In Wonderland Representation Test
    [schema type=”movie” url=”http://movies.disney.com/alice-in-wonderland-1951″ name=”Alice In Wonderland” description=”Join Alice as she chases the White Rabbit and journeys into a topsy-turvy world that gets “curiouser and curiouser” as her fantastical adventures unfold. Meet the Mad Hatter, March Hare, Tweedledee & Tweedledum, the Cheshire Cat, the Queen of Hearts and more unforgettable characters, all set against a backdrop of awe-inspiring splendor.” director=”Clyde Geronimi, Wilfred Jackson, Hamilton Luske” actor_1=”Kathryn Beaumont” ]

    Main Cast Kathryn Beaumont Alice (voice), Ed Wynn Mad Hatter (voice), Richard Haydn Caterpillar (voice), Sterling Holloway Cheshire Cat (voice)
    Rating G
    Release Date Thu 26 Jul 1951 UTC
    Director Clyde Geronimi, Wilfred Jackson
    Genres Animation, Adventure, Family, Fantasy, Musical
    Plot Alice stumbles into the world of Wonderland. Will she get home? Not if the Queen of Hearts has her way.
    Poster Alice in Wonderland
    Runtime 75
    Tagline A world of wonders in One Great Picture
    Writers Lewis Carroll (as Lewis Carrol) (adaptation), Winston Hibler (story) …
    Year 1951
  • The Man in the White Suit (1951)

    The Man in the White Suit (1951)

    #140RVW

    Classic Ealing comedy is a slow burn. Actually better than it needs to be, though unusually not all that funny. Could have been chase movie.

    The Man in the White Suit

    What’s more:

    I was expecting this to be typically screwy comedy from Ealing Studios, and it definitely fit that formula, but I was rather impressed with the sophistication of the storyline. With a little more work or an inclination in that direction, this could have been a drama or a chase picture.

    The Man in the White Suit

    The story centers around Sidney Stratton (Alec Guinness), a bright if reckless chemist working in the textile industry, whether they like it or not. He has been moving from one mill to another, covertly working on his very costly experiments without the knowledge or approval of management. While working at his latest home, Birnley Mill, he befriends and impresses Daphne Birnley (Joan Greenwood), daughter of the mill’s owner, and she persuades her father to allow Sidney to continue his experiments.

    The Man in the White Suit

    Sidney has developed an indestructible fabric that repels dirt and never needs replacing. Naturally, this development would lead to the complete breakdown and extinction of his and all related industries. Sidney must be made to see reason, and the discovery suppressed. But he’s not going down easy.

    The Man in the White Suit

    Audiences familiar with Guinness only through his later work are in for a treat with these Ealing comedies. He really was a most resourceful actor and was at the height of his talents at the time of this film.

    (Another thrill comes from seeing Alfred Pennyworth himself, the late Michael Gough as a young man.)

    The Man in the White Suit

    The film was directed by Boston native Alexander Mackendrick, who would go on to direct Guinness in The Ladykillers a few years later. The script was nominated for an Oscar and the movie was a hit. It remains a classic and is highly recommended.

    Poster:

    The Man in the White Suit

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:
    The Representation Test Score: D (3 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    Representation Test

     

    Main Cast Alec Guinness Sidney Stratton, Joan Greenwood Daphne Birnley, Cecil Parker Alan Birnley, Michael Gough Michael Corland
    Rating Approved
    Release Date Tue 01 Apr 1952 UTC
    Director Alexander Mackendrick
    Genres Comedy, Sci-Fi, Drama
    Plot An altruistic chemist invents a fabric that resists wear and stain as boon to humanity but both capital and labor realize it must be suppressed for economic reasons.
    Poster The Man in the White Suit
    Runtime 85
    Tagline Should they let him play…or should they put him away?
    Writers Roger MacDougall (play), Roger MacDougall (screenplay) …
    Year 1951