Tag: 1990

  • Jurassic Park (1990)

    Jurassic Park (1990)

    Jurassic Park
    Jurassic Park by Michael Crichton

    My rating: 4 of 5 stars

    Probably Michael Crichton’s most popular novel, Jurassic Park actually earns the praise, as it is a clever and entertaining read; among his best.

    The author really had a gift for examining complex issues and crafting captivating tales around them. A more cynical author would see these topical issues as simply fodder for a setting; an excuse to retell the same story with a new twist and count on people interested in the current topic area as a built-in audience. In Crichton’s stories, however, the big idea is not only absolutely crucial to the story, it’s frequently the raison d’être.

    So it is with Jurassic Park, in which the author examines ethical issues surrounding scientism, the impact of commercialization and profitability into the sciences, cloning, natural selection, corporate espionage and patronage. Plus it has dinosaurs!

    After all, while it’s a well-researched, whip-smart study, first and foremost it’s a great story – a classic adventure in the mold of Jules Verne, Arthur Conan Doyle or Robert Louis Stevenson.

    The novel actually had a long gestation period, having been started as early as 1983, while Crichton struggled to get the right story/feel. This is sort of amusing in retrospect, as he really shouldn’t have needed to look far for inspiration – he’d already written and directed a film about a high-tech amusement park turned deadly (Westworld).

    If you’ve only seen the film and not read the source novel, I can highly recommend Jurassic Park. You’ll absolutely gain appreciation for the story and get more out of the picture. The film is largely faithful to the book, at least in the ways that matter – tone, intent, conclusions. But the novel understandably has much more meat on the bone, and the scientific processes and the logic behind decisions and motivations is much clearer, making what may initially seem a far-fetched tale much more credible.

    The best reason to read the novel may be the following passage, which is condensed into possibly the best scene in the film, but really bears repeating in full:

    “Most kinds of power require a substantial sacrifice by whoever wants the power. There is an apprenticeship, a discipline lasting many years. Whatever kind of power you want. President of the company. Black belt in karate. Spiritual guru. Whatever it is you seek, you have to put in the time, the practice, the effort. You must give up a lot to get it. It has to be very important to you. And once you have attained it, it’s your power. It can’t be given away: it resides in you. It is literally the result of your discipline.

    Now what is interesting about this process is that, by the time someone has acquired the ability to kill with his bare hands, he has also matured to the point where he won’t use it unwisely. So that kind of power has a built-in control. The discipline of getting the power changes you so that you won’t abuse it.

    But scientific power is like inherited wealth: attained without discipline. You read what others have done, and you take the next step. You can do it very young. You can make progress very fast.
    There is no discipline lasting many decades. There is no mastery: old scientists are ignored. There is no humility before nature. There is only a get-rich-quick, make-a-name-for-yourself-fast philosophy.

    Cheat, lie, falsify–it doesn’t matter. Not to you, or to your colleagues. No one will criticize you. No one has any standards. They all trying to do the same thing: to do something big, and do it fast.

    And because you can stand on the shoulders of giants, you can accomplish something quickly. Yon don’t even-know exactly what you have done, but already you have reported it; patented it, and sold it. And the buyer will have even less discipline than you. The buyer simply purchases the power, like any commodity. The buyer doesn’t even conceive that any discipline might be necessary.

    I’ll make it simple. A karate master does not kill people with his bare hands. He does not lose his temper and kill his wife. The person who kills is the person who has no discipline no restraint, and who has purchased his power in the form of a Saturday night special. And that is the kind of power that science fosters, and permits. And that is why you think that to build a place like this is simple.”

    Jurassic Park

    For the 25th anniversary of the publication of the novel, and to tie into the release of the new film Jurassic World, Brilliance Audio has released a new unabridged audiobook narrated by Scott Brick. I’ve only just started it, but Brick is a great reader and I am enjoying it very much. I’m particularly enjoying just being able to listen to the story again. We bought my dad the Random House Audiobooks version from the early 1990’s and we all listened to it a million times. This version was only released in abridged version and on audio cassette and was ably read by John Heard. Despite the short run-time of only three hours, I quite enjoyed it. While I vastly prefer unabridged audiobooks, there’s often something nice about the abridged versions – they allow you to listen to a complete (if gutted) story during the time it takes to work on a project. Which is invariably what I was doing when listening. To this day, to hear this and a few other audiobooks is to mentally reach for a screwdriver or begin sorting files…

    Jurassic Park was a great read when it was published and remains a great read now. The topic was ahead of its time and inspired many to explore STEM, creating an uptick in people pursuing paleontology, chaos theory and genetics. Or at least we all found them fascinating and took a greater interest, and hey, that’s something…

    Jurassic Park

    [schema type=”book” name=”Jurassic Park” description=”A billionaire has created a technique to clone dinosaurs. From the DNA that his crack team of scientists extract, he is able to grow the dinosaurs in his laboratories and lock them away on an island behind electric fences, creating a sort of theme park. He asks a group of scientists from several different fields to come and view the park, but something goes terribly wrong when a worker on the island turns traitor and shuts down the power.
    __
    An astonishing technique for recovering and cloning dinosaur DNA has been discovered. Creatures once extinct now roam Jurassic Park, soon-to-be opened as a theme park. Until something goes wrong…and science proves a dangerous toy….” author=”Michael Crichton” publisher=”Knopf” pubdate=”1990-11-07″ isbn=”0394588169″ ebook=”yes” paperback=”yes” hardcover=”yes” ]

  • Gremlins 2: The New Batch (1990)

    Gremlins 2: The New Batch (1990)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    I really thought Gremlins 2 was a better movie than the original. I believed it for years. Then I re-watched them now back to back. Oops…

    Gremlins 2

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of Gremlins 2: The New Batch:

    Gremlins 2: The New Batch is almost certainly the most unusual, atypical sequel ever made. It’s quite divisive for the same reason. It’s really interesting; there must be an equal percentage of people who liked and hated it, but it would be very hard to predict what percentage of each of those groups would count themselves fans of the original film.

    My informal straw poll of acquaintances over the years finds that most people never even saw it. I suppose that isn’t very surprising. I didn’t see it in the theater, myself. The sequel came out in 1990, six years after the first film. That’s a little too long for a sequel for this type of movie. The film landscape had changed quite a bit in that time. There was no way this tale of a cute puppet that turns into monstrous puppets was going to have the same impact second time around.

    Gremlins 2

    Director Joe Dante really didn’t want to make a sequel, and the movie languished in development hell until he was persuaded to return with complete creative control. But a lot of time had passed; Chris Columbus, who came up with the original story, was now an accomplished screenwriter and director and about to hit it out of the park with the film Home Alone. Special effects wizard Chris Walas had also moved on to a directing career (if less successfully), and so the look of the Gremlins and therefore the film was going to have to change.

    With the extra leash Dante had earned, he set out to make a film that would effectively skewer the very concept of sequels. Dante made a film like someone who has been talked into something and either a) wants to get fired, or b) knows he never will be fired and can therefore do whatever he wants. Gremlins 2 is a subversive cartoon of a movie.

    The film was written by Charlie Haas, who is a fairly interesting choice based on his previous credits. My exhaustive research (i.e.; looking it up on imdb) shows him as the screenwriter of a pair of early Matt Dillon movies, Over the Edge & Tex, and some TV movies. I wonder what it was that caused the producers to hire him. Whatever it was, I’m grateful, because this is a great script, as is his follow-up, the wonderful Matinee.

    FX legend Rick Baker came aboard to take on the thankless task of updating someone else’s work. He was likely persuaded by Dante & Haas’ vision of many more varied Gremlins. This produced mixed results.

    Gremlins 2

    It’s a crazy movie. It even starts off very unusually, with a Looney Tunes intro. Warner Bros was celebrating the 50th birthday of Bugs Bunny at the time and shoehorned this whole animated bit into the film. The plus side is that it reunited animation legend Chuck Jones with the characters that had made him so famous. The down side, of course, is that it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever to have the cartoon lead-in. It was initially a few minutes long, but when studio execs found it confusing (which it was), they cut it back to a very brief intro (which did nothing to make its inclusion less confusing). This may seem to be an odd point to focus on, but it really is a bizarre decision. I think the concept was to let the audience know that the movie they were about to watch would have a cartoonish zaniness to it – it didn’t. It made you wonder what the hell was going on and gave you the impression that what you were actually in for was total madness. Hmm, actually, maybe it did work…

    Because that tone is prevalent throughout the film, and this is really where the dividing line sits. If you thought the first movie was too dark, you were in for a treat. If you thought the first movie wasn’t dark enough, you were in for a long night.

    Gremlins 2

    Gremlins 2 as a sequel has the unique distinction of being criticized both for being too derivative, and too dissimilar. Sort of depends on what you thought about the first film.

    The setup is nearly exactly the same, but the delivery is completely different.

    Billy & Katie have left their hometown of Kingston Falls for the big city, where they both work in a futuristic automated tower, the province of billionaire media mogul Daniel Clamp (perfectly played by John Glover). Through an unlikely chain of occurrences, Gizmo ends up in the tower and briefly back in the custody of Billy. Of course Gizmo gets wet, spawns a bunch of mischievous Mogwai who will manage to turn into Gremlins nearly before the first act is complete.

    Gremlins 2

    Here’s where it gets a bit different. The whole picture takes place in one main location – the office building. The choice of single location is inspired; aside from the interesting things you can do with monsters in a tower, it provides a setting from which to completely satirize 1980’s society. And this is where you begin to realize that we’re in for more of a comedy farce.

    They make the unusual decision to distinguish the Mogwai, leading to some of the all-time worst character designs Rick Baker has ever been responsible for. One has “crazy eyes”, which is always a sign of trouble; another seems to be channeling Edward G. Robinson of all people.

    Gremlins 2

    In order to keep things interesting, the Gremlins get into a genetic research lab (run by Christopher Lee because why not) where they can sample different formulas that will transform them into different Gremlin hybrids. Sort of interesting, but it also instantly takes the movie from scary to silly. I don’t think anything about this movie could ever be confused with the borderline horror feel of the original.

    They even bring in John Astin (Gomez Addams) for a cameo and cast Robert Prosky as Grampa Fred, a Grampa Munster type character just to underline the camp horror aspect they’re going for.

    For the most part, the humor is excellent, particularly the automated messages from the building itself or the building staff picking apart the ridiculousness of the 3 rules for the Mogwai. It’s good satire, but the whole movie is seriously dated as a result. All the topical 80’s references simply don’t play anywhere near as well now. In the first film, Gizmo marvels as Clark Gable as a race car driver and recreates the role later in the film as he’s becoming the hero. I didn’t need to explain to my daughter who Clark Gable was – it was an archetype, not an in-joke. But when Gizmo goes Rambo in the sequel, I did have to pause the movie to explain the whole Rambo thing. And don’t get me started on the Hulk Hogan cameo…

    Gremlins 2Once the movie settles into the endless scenes of Gremlin shenanigans, the style moves directly into cartoon territory and never looks back. This is the stuff you came to see. The original also basked in the insanity of the Gremlins misbehaving and taking over the town. Interestingly, when you think about it, while the Gremlins do a lot of damage, they appear to do little real harm. Only the school teacher and the nasty realtor buy it in the first film. After that, all the humans make miraculous recoveries. (A big change from the first script, which had the creatures going to McDonalds to eat people.) It’s even more toothless here. I’m not sure anyone actually conclusively dies in the whole movie.

    The movie also suffers from a sequel trend found in many films but nowhere so much as in the 1980’s: what I’m going to call character creep. You have a bit part in a movie, it’s funny, people like it. (Judge Reinhold in Beverly Hills Cop, Rick Moranis in Ghostbusters, Dick Miller as Murray Futterman in Gremlins) They make a sequel and think “Let’s bring them back but now they’re one of the stars! Everyone wants more of them!” No, we don’t. Not at all. It worked because it was an aside, a little extra color to the film. No one wants more sprinkles on their ice cream – a little bit is enough.

    Gremlins 2

    For years I told anyone who would listen that Gremlins 2 was a chaotic, funny, subversive and great movie and superior to the original. Now I’m not so sure. It really doesn’t age well in comparison to the original. The of-the-moment jokes really date it, and while the cartoonish craziness is still very funny all of the varied Gremlin characters cross the line into actual cartoons. Like the Looney Tunes characters that interject themselves into the closing credits, the zaniness goes too far and feels out of place.

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Pass

    The Representation Test Score: C (4 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    Representation Test

    [schema type=”movie” name=”Gremlins 2: The New Batch” description=”Billy Peltzer and Kate Beringer move to New York City and meet up with their Mogwai friend, Gizmo, when a series of accidents creates a new generation of diverse gremlins. Billy, Kate, and Gizmo must once again use all their experience to prevent another catastrophe.” director=”Joe Dante” actor_1=”Zach Galligan” ]

    Main Cast Zach Galligan Billy Peltzer, Phoebe Cates Kate Beringer, John Glover Daniel Clamp, Robert Prosky Grandpa Fred
    Rating PG-13
    Release Date Fri 15 Jun 1990 UTC
    Director Joe Dante
    Genres Comedy, Horror
    Plot The Gremlins are back, and this time, they’ve taken total control over the building of a media mogul.
    Poster Gremlins 2: The New Batch
    Runtime 106
    Tagline Take Your Batch to See the New Batch.
    Writers Chris Columbus (characters), Charles S. Haas (as Charlie Haas) (written by)
    Year 1990
  • Total Recall (1990)

    Total Recall (1990)

    #140RVW

    Did you know that they planned to make a sequel to this movie based on the story Minority Report? Can you imagine how awful that would be?

    Total Recall (1990)

    What’s more:

    Ok, let’s get this out of the way; I know you remember this being great – it isn’t. That’s not to say that it’s bad – it’s not; well, maybe it is pretty bad. But in any event it isn’t great, and I suspect it’s better in your memory than in reality.

    Total Recall (1990)
    Arnold Schwarzenegger in The Running Man. No wait, this is Total Recall, isn’t it? He has the same job, though?

    The story is great, of course. Based on legendary science fiction author Philip K. Dick’s short story, “We Can Remember It For You Wholesale”, the bones for a very good sci-fi film are there. It’s all there for you in the short story – just pick it up and don’t screw it up. Of course, it is a short story, so you’ll need to do some real work to make a feature out of it. Fortunately, you’re in good hands with Dan O’Bannon and Ron Shusett, writers of a little picture called “Alien”. These guys are old farm hands, and they know how to write science fiction for the screen. (Their original screen story was also worked on by Jon Povill & Gary Goldman.)

    Total Recall (1990)
    “This is a Verhoeven movie; there will be boobies!”

    Dick’s story accounts for the central premise and essentially the first 15 minutes of the movie. SPOILER: The main character never gets out of the chair in the book. (Although it’s possible that he never leaves the chair in the film, either; an outcome not left in as much doubt as it should be.)

    Total Recall (1990)
    “Okay. That means that…our whole solar system…could be, like…one tiny atom in the fingernail of some other giant being. This is too much!”

    As soon as Ahnold storms out of Rekall, we’re off book. What follows is a very good sci-fi head trip in which we are forced to wonder what is reality and similar heavy themes. That’s the story, not the execution. The execution is a truly ugly, poorly acted, overly violent, badly designed mess. Don’t confuse the two – it’s perfectly acceptable to think this was a great idea for movie and a terrible movie. They aren’t mutually exclusive.

    Total Recall (1990)
    “You have just enjoyed a very inferior film. Boy, that’s a weird fortune. Arnold, what did you get?”

    To over simplify, the only good decision the producers made was to make the movie in the first place. Everything after that was downhill; the selection of director, the casting, the production design, the effects studio – everything. (Of course, Ahnold was in the drivers seat for most of these decisions, having rescued the movie from development hell.)

    Total Recall (1990)
    “Warm it up, everything you’ve got. C’mon you apes, you wanna live forever?”

    Don’t reflexively argue because you thought it was great at the time – go rewatch it and tell me if it plays like you remember. Then watch the remake. Don’t misunderstand – it may have seemed great at the time when we hadn’t seen a lot of trippy mind-bending sci-fi. It may have even been great – or more accurately, the flaws may have been less important in the face of the unique story. But viewed objectively, it really is not a very good movie.

    Total Recall (1990)
    “Cool miniature set! So is there a big fight scene here? No?”
    Additional thoughts written while watching:
    • How seriously did they take the source material? They misspelled Philip K. Dick’s first name, if that’s any indication.
    • Re-watching this I get why Sharon Stone became a star; she’s engaging. Awful, but engaging…
    • They wanted Arnold to play Robocop but he was too large for the suit. They should have let him do that role and cast someone remotely believable as a spy for this…
    • JohnnyCab – make this possible now, please.
    • Ah, the 80’s, the only time Michael Ironside & Ronny Cox could be stars.
    • I know it’s 1990, but couldn’t they do better effects than this? ILM was doing amazing work at this same time. The producers were just being cheap. I know that the CG is groundbreaking; it looks crappy but it was a time of transition – I’m not judging that – it would be unfair. But the practical effects are another matter. The miniatures are pretty good but the green screens are unbelievable, and the sets and Mexico City locations are dreadful. Every scene in this movie looks like it was shot in the same hallway. These would be poor sets on 1990’s television budgets.
    Total Recall (1990)
    “Wow, those miniatures are great. Cool matte paintings. So what scenes take place here? What, none? Sigh. Fine. I guess we’ll just go back into the same hallway set.”
    • DP Jost Vacano went from being making Wolfgang Petersen’s German films to making truly ugly films for Verhoeven.
    • They really had a type for the female leads in Arnold’s movies didn’t they? Rachel Ticotin in this one, Rae Dawn Chong in Commando, Maria Conchita Alonso in The Running Man.
    • What the hell is with Verhoeven? The ultraviolence is so unbelievably over the top that slasher movies seem tame by comparison.
    • It’s not just the violence, either. Each effect seems designed to trigger revulsion – it is truly gross…
    • This is the cleanest, most well-lit brothel ever committed to film…
    • The prosthetic work on the mutants is a whole new level of disgusting.
    • Sweet merciful Zeus! What the hell is that prosthetic puppet thing in his chest?
    • This may be the ugliest movie I’ve ever seen.
    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Fail

    Main Cast Arnold Schwarzenegger Douglas Quaid/Hauser, Sharon Stone Lori, Michael Ironside Richter, Rachel Ticotin Melina
    Rating R
    Release Date Fri 01 Jun 1990 UTC
    Director Paul Verhoeven
    Genres Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi
    Plot When a man goes for virtual vacation memories of the planet Mars, an unexpected and harrowing series of events forces him to go to the planet for real, or does he?
    Poster Total Recall
    Runtime 113
    Tagline They stole his mind, now he wants it back.
    Writers Philip K. Dick (as Phillip K. Dick) (short story “We Can Remember It For You Wholesale”) (inspiration), Ronald Shusett (screen story) …
    Year 1990
  • Young Guns II (1990)

    Young Guns II (1990)

    #140RVW

    Reaches far beyond original movie, which was shot more like a music video than a Western. Gorgeous photography & very good characterization.

    Young Guns II

    What’s more:

    This is one of my favorite movies, and I won’t apologize for it. It’s hardly high art, but it is a highly enjoyable movie that approaches (if not reaches) something even better.

    To start with, I liked the first one. Virtually all of the criticisms of it are valid; it definitely had that MTV-style over substance thing going on and the actors looked like little boys playing cowboys & indians. (Actually, in hindsight this may have been ahead of its time a little on the use of music video styling in filmmaking.)

    But for all that, I liked it. While not probably expected to be a beacon of historical accuracy, it was probably more on the money than any other film on the Kid, and certainly takes the subject matter seriously. There are lots of fun little moments, particularly early on with Terrance Stamp. The brat pack of young actors actually handle themselves well and the biggest problem with the movie frankly is it’s so Hollywood. It feels like the big production that it is and subtlety is out the window.

    Young Guns II

    By contrast, then, the sequel feels markedly different. The characters have tried to move on from the events of the Lincoln County War, and if they are not entirely successful, it makes for more interesting characters. As The Kid enjoys his notoriety, it clearly is not fulfilling him as he tries to reclaim the camaraderie of the Regulators and his desperation at trying to keep the group together is real.

    And if William Petersen isn’t given the screen time to really delve into the interesting character of Pat Garrett, it’s no slight on his performance, which makes use of all the time he has. In the hands of a different director, this film could have possibly become a character study between these two fascinating men.

    Young Guns II

    The story is a much better one than last time. One thing I observed and consider a great tool is the fact that the characters are always in motion, always setting out on adventures, but in the end they really never get anywhere; they are prisoners of their own lifestyle, one that is untenable. The dialogue may not be cited by many film professors, but I think there are some really wonderful passages that benefit immensely by the fine work the actors do in making the words seem entirely natural to their characters.

    The cinematography of this movie is really what I keep coming back to, though, when it comes to why I think this movie is worthy of attention. Director of Photography Dean Semler, who would win an Oscar for his other 1990 film Dances With Wolves, shot both movies in this series. I don’t know if it was the change of locations (this one split time between Arizona & New Mexico) or a deliberate different feel to reflect the story, but this film feels so much more grand. Vistas are sweeping and vast, hues are reflective of the desert and the Old West seems alive.

    Need any other reasons to give it a try? Let’s see: a young Viggo Mortensen has a neat part as one of the lawmen, Jon Bon Jovi gets shot, and James Coburn (the most wonderful voice in Hollywood) brings the gravitas, and one of his lines from when he played Pat Garrett!

    Young Guns II

    Poster:

    Trailer:

  • #140RVW: Edward Scissorhands (1990)

    #140RVW: Edward Scissorhands (1990)

    Post-Batman Burton given leash to direct own story; world of film better for it. Delightful fairy tale marks arrival of new visual master…

    Edward Scissorhands

    Poster:

     

    Trailer: