Author: mfordfeeney

  • Terry Pratchett: My 10 Favorite Quotes

    Terry Pratchett: My 10 Favorite Quotes

    In 2004, Terry Pratchett came to Boston to be the Guest of Honor at WorldCon and did the first local signing in the over ten years I’d been reading his books. It was at the Boston Public Library. My wife & daughter were both ill, so I went by myself. (My wife would later get to see him speak a few years later at Harvard.)

    I expected the usual book signing experience – author reads a bit, takes a couple of questions, then signs til hand falls off. But Pterry came out and put on a one-man show, talking at length about a variety of subjects for nearly 2 hours. He was charming, hysterical, insightful and everything his writing led you to expect.

    Afterwards, I waited for nearly as long in line to see him. I was quite literally the last person in line since I’d gone off to make a phone call to check on my family right after the talk. He chatted and signed a book for everyone, despite how late it was getting and how much time he’d already spent at this gig.

    When I finally reached the front I asked if he wouldn’t mind signing two books, since neither of my girls could be there. He said, “Well, I’m only supposed to sign one but it’s the back of the queue” and graciously signed them, commenting on how pretty my daughter Moira’s name was and shook my hand.

    I was truly honored to meet such a great man.

    “The thing about witchcraft,” said Mistress Weatherwax, “is that it’s not like school at all. First you get the test, and then afterward you spend years findin’ out how you passed it. It’s a bit like life in that respect.”

    You passed, Terry…


     My top 10 favorite Pterry quotes:

    1. “We are here and this is now.” – Night Watch
    2. “But there are causes worth dying for,” said Butterfly. “No, there aren’t! Because you’ve only got one life but you can pick up another five causes on any street corner!” “Good grief, how can you live with a philosophy like that?” Rincewind took a deep breath. “Continuously!” – Interesting Times
    3. “I will give you some free advice.” “Will it cost me anything?” “You could say it is priceless. Are you listening?” “Yes.” “Good. Now … if you trust in yourself…” “Yes?” “… and believe in your dreams…” “Yes?” “… and follow your star…” “Yes?” “… you’ll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren’t so lazy.” – The Wee Free Men
    4. “What is there in this world that makes living worthwhile?” Death thought about it. CATS, he said finally. CATS ARE NICE. – Sourcery
    5. “The reward you get for digging holes is a bigger shovel.” – I Shall Wear Midnight
    6. “Sometimes it’s better to light a flamethrower than curse the darkness.” – Men at Arms
    7. “It’s vital to remember who you really are. It’s very important. It isn’t a good idea to rely on other people or things to do it for you, you see. They always get it wrong.” – Sourcery
    8. “Or, to put it another way, the existence of a badly put-together watch proved the existence of a blind watchmaker.” – Small Gods
    9. “Inside every old person is a young person wondering what happened.” – Moving Pictures
    10. “Give a man a fire and he’s warm for a day, but set fire to him and he’s warm for the rest of his life.” – Jingo

    Honorable mention:

    • “Winners never talk about glorious victories. That’s because they’re the ones who see what the battlefield looks like afterward. It’s only the losers who have glorious victories.” – Small Gods
    • “The reason that clichés become clichés is that they are the hammers and screwdrivers in the toolbox of communication.” – Guards! Guards!
    • “They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it is not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance.”  – Equal Rites
    • THAT’S MORTALS FOR YOU, Death continued. THEY’VE ONLY GOT A FEW YEARS IN THIS WORLD AND THEY SPEND THEM ALL IN MAKING THINGS COMPLICATED FOR THEMSELVES. – Mort
    • William wondered why he always disliked people who said “no offense meant.” Maybe it was because they found it easier to say “no offense meant”than actually refrain from giving offense. – The Truth
    • “You get a wonderful view from the point of no return.” – Making Money
    • “Logic is a wonderful thing but doesn’t always beat actual thought.” – The Last Continent
    • “I have no use for people who have learned the limits of the possible.” – The Last Hero
    • “I commend my soul to any god that can find it.” – Going Postal
    • “His progress through life was hampered by his tremendous sense of his own ignorance, a disability which affects all too few people.” – Maskerade

    Thanks to:

    http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Discworld

    http://www.co.uk.lspace.org/books/pqf/index.html

  • Mr. Peabody & Sherman (2014)

    Mr. Peabody & Sherman (2014)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    Exactly what it looks like. Well-made: did good job of maintaining the spirit of the old cartoon, but instantly forgettable (like cartoon?).

    Mr. Peabody & Sherman

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of Mr. Peabody & Sherman:

    I loved Rocky & Bullwinkle as a kid – still do – and the Mr. Peabody & Sherman cartoons were a big highlight. I love the awful puns, the understated humor, the delivery – it’s all great. So I viewed this DreamWorks Animation feature with trepidation. I assumed that it would be funny – I also assumed that it would be a completely paint-by-numbers “modern” cg-makeover that was obligated to create an unnecessary story with conflicts and character arcs. Sometimes it would be nice to be surprised…

    There’s a scene in the underrated 1990 comedy Quick Change in which Bill Murray’s character, a jaded and burnt out city planner who has decided to become a bank robber, stares at the glass monstrosity of a new skyscraper going up and dejectedly laments, “Why do they have to do this?” I feel that way every time one of these movies based on increasingly questionable source material is announced. Every single thing created in our world does not need to be adapted to film. They’re making feature films based on board games at this point for goodness sake.

    Mr. Peabody & Sherman

    I’d have to say I liked Mr. Peabody & Sherman, since it would be untrue to say I disliked it. It was completely serviceable. With most reviews I’d make some comment that adequate is probably not what they were going for, but in this case I think it may have been. I’m becoming increasingly convinced that these cg-animated movies are aiming extremely low.

    Sure, the jokes were pretty good and they brought over the sensibility of the cartoon exactly. But then they built it up with the usual DreamWorks Animation crap – you know, the too cool for school pop culture references that you aren’t really sure what audience they’re targeted to. I hate that crap. It shows a complete lack of respect for the audience.

    Mr. Peabody & Sherman

    I came to this conclusion when I asked the rhetorical question “how do they think this stuff will play in a few years’ time?” That’s when I realized they simply are not concerned with that. They are making a movie for right now – there isn’t a thought given to the shelf life of the movie. That shows not just shortsightedness, but also implies a disdain for the work itself. You can’t spend this much money and time on something and not care about its legacy unless you really don’t feel that it has any value to begin with. (Although, based on the disappointing box office receipts that caused the studio to take a $57 million write-down on it and nearly single-handedly tanked the stock and made the company vulnerable to takeover bids, maybe they were right…)

    So yes, I submit that the filmmakers and this studio in particular have no respect for the work they are creating and are just making widgets. Well, mission accomplished. See ya soon for the Connect Four movie…

    mr peabody and sherman_still5

    By the way, this film has inspired me to create a new section on the site, #140FAQ, where I post my Frequently Asked Questions (mine, not yours) in 140 characters. Here’s the first:

    #140FAQ Is there some sort of rule that all cg-animated movies must have a “funny” end scene of characters dancing to pop song? #BlameShrek

    Mr. Peabody & Sherman

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Fail

    The Representation Test Score: I dunno, hard to do for these movies; call it a C (4 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    Main Cast Ty Burrell Mr. Peabody (voice), Max Charles Sherman (voice), Stephen Colbert Paul Peterson (voice), Leslie Mann Patty Peterson (voice)
    Rating PG
    Release Date Fri 07 Mar 2014 UTC
    Director Rob Minkoff
    Genres Animation, Adventure, Comedy, Family, Sci-Fi
    Plot The time-travelling adventures of an advanced canine and his adopted son, as they endeavor to fix a time rift they created.
    Poster Mr. Peabody & Sherman
    Runtime 92
    Tagline He’s leaving his mark on history.
    Writers Jay Ward (based on the series produced by), Craig Wright (screenplay)
    Year 2014
  • Star Trek III: The Search for Spock (1984)

    Star Trek III: The Search for Spock (1984)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    Unfairly lumped in with the “odd-numbered Trek movie” theory, but it sort of fits. Definition of a bridge movie, one of my favorites anyway.

    Star Trek III: The Search for Spock

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of Star Trek III: The Search for Spock:

    February 27, 2015: I actually wrote the above 140-character review during the summer of 2014 when the film was celebrating its 30th anniversary, but held it since I planned to do a full series on the franchise. With the sad news that broke earlier today about the death of Leonard Nimoy, however, I’ll do a quick one to honor his passing, and plan to revisit his directorial debut in more depth at a later date.

    Star Trek III: The Search for Spock

    I saw the first 4 Star Trek movies in the theater as a kid, even if I was too young to get much out of the first one (I still have never re-watched Star Trek: The Motion Picture, actually. I think the only time I saw it was in the theater in 1979 unless I’m forgetting it – I understand it’s pretty forgettable.) But I have very vivid memories of seeing Search for Spock. It may be partly because of my age, but I’d like to think it was mostly because of the anticipation. It was the first one I was really looking forward to going to see. Wrath of Khan was both an unbelievable film and a total cliffhanger. The path for the next movie was set and I couldn’t wait to see how they were going to resolve it. I remember discussing the movie with my dad and talking about what I thought would happen; I remember seeing the posters in the Chestnut Hill General Cinema and getting excited. I couldn’t have known it then, but I was beginning to view and appreciate films with a more critical eye that would one day lead to being the opinionated snob before you.

    Star Trek III: The Search for Spock

    The main problem with Star Trek III: The Search for Spock, and I mean the only one that really matters, is that it had the bad fortune to follow the greatest movie in the series, Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. Khan is arguably one of the greatest science fiction films of all time, so anything that had to try to top it was in for a rough time.

    Despite the aforementioned disadvantage of having a tough act to follow, it did have the benefit of having a very good foundation and setup already laid out for it. The film inherits the naval feel of the Starfleet that Nicholas Meyer established in Khan and gets to build on characters and a plot previously established as well. It even gets to keep the score by James Horner, who comes back to build on one of his finest works.

    Star Trek III: The Search for Spock

    The two films are really bookends (even if the story arc wouldn’t be complete until the end of #4. After Khan’s ending, everyone knew exactly what had to be the story for the sequel – the title even spelled it out. So the question would simply be how they got there. Depending on who you listen to, either Leonard Nimoy was reinvigorated by #2 and eager to return for #3, or he would only return if he was allowed to direct. The latter is the story I always heard growing up, but I believe that his story may have been confused with Shatner’s because the accounts I’ve read in the intervening years seem to indicate that Nimoy was energized by the execution of the Khan storyline (who wouldn’t be?).

    Star Trek III: The Search for Spock

    Nimoy had directed a few TV episodes, but this would be his feature film directorial debut. In that regard, Search for Spock is quite interesting; it keeps a lot of the feel that Meyer established, but it definitely has its own pacing and focus.

    While Spock is seldom on screen, he hovers over every scene as the raison d’être, keeping for a tight narrative. His physical absence however gives other members of the ensemble some welcome screen time and depth. DeForest Kelley’s Bones, as the third leg of the stool, is bumped up to nearly leading man status, and it is an absolute blast to see George Takei’s Sulu & Nichelle Nichols’ Uhura kicking some rank and file butts in their civvies. When the Enterprise is staffed by only five crew members, it provides an entirely different dynamic in contrast to the military precision of the previous film, recalling the days of the classic TV show (minus the redshirts…)

    Star Trek III: The Search for Spock

    With the focus so completely on Spock’s journey, it’s perhaps understandable if not entirely excusable that the MacGuffin is carried over exactly from Khan. There’s a very “blow up the Death Star again” feeling to the whole Genesis storyline, now that the Klingons are seeking the exact same thing this time.

    Star Trek III: The Search for Spock

    How about those Klingons? I really like their ruthlessness and their Bird of Prey ships are phenomenally designed – among the most iconic starships ever, which was getting hard to do post Star Wars. Also, let me just say that I love Christopher Lloyd. I really do. He does a great job with a fairly plain character, but he’s just a little too recognizable to completely disappear into the role. I just can’t quite forget that I’m watching “The Reverend Jim Ignatowski, as himself”. Apparently one of the other Klingons is played by John Larroquette – I don’t know how I never knew this before today. (on right, below)

    Star Trek III: The Search for Spock

    On the whole, Search for Spock does a really good job for a movie that frankly isn’t about anything. The whole picture was a checkbox that needed to be filled in after the somewhat obvious decision to make the ending of Khan a cliffhanger for all practical purposes. All it had to do was bring back the character so things could get back to normal. It is entirely to the credit of the filmmakers that the movie does more than this. It can’t stand on its own, of course, but neither does it feel completely Reliant (heh, heh) on the pictures that bookend it.

    Star Trek III: The Search for Spock

    It’s actually my second favorite Trek film; partly because it is more of an extension of Khan than a singular film, partly because I remember it so fondly from when it came out, but mostly because it’s just very good. It’s the right amount of funny, the action is good and it takes chances by ending some things you didn’t expect. Also, it opens with the emotional scenes from Khan that gut me every time. And I promised myself I wouldn’t cry. Again…

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Fail

    The Representation Test Score: B (7 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    [schema type=”movie” url=”http://www.startrek.com/” name=”Star Trek III: The Search for Spock” description=”Admiral Kirk and his bridge crew risk their careers stealing the decommissioned Enterprise to return to the restricted Genesis planet to recover Spock’s body.” director=”Leonard Nimoy” actor_1=”William Shatner” actor_2=”Leonard Nimoy”]

    Main Cast William Shatner Kirk, Leonard Nimoy Capt. Spock, DeForest Kelley McCoy, James Doohan Scotty
    Rating PG
    Release Date Fri 01 Jun 1984 UTC
    Director Leonard Nimoy
    Genres Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi, Thriller
    Plot Admiral Kirk and his bridge crew risk their careers stealing the decommissioned Enterprise to return to the restricted Genesis planet to recover Spock’s body.
    Poster Star Trek III: The Search for Spock
    Runtime 105
    Tagline The final voyage of the Starship Enterprise.
    Writers Gene Roddenberry (television series Star Trek), Harve Bennett (written by)
    Year 1984
  • Paddington (2015)

    Paddington (2015)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    Formulaic, unnecessary CG update of classic kids book hugely surpasses expectations with loving & artistic presentation. Enjoyable & cute…

    Paddington

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of Paddington:

    On the face of it, just another ill-advised modern update of every intellectual property that unimaginative filmmakers could scrape up instead of coming up with original ideas. And it is – the movie really didn’t need to be made. But since they did make it, at least they were good enough to make a decent job of it.

    If you are getting the sense that I’m conflicted about this one, good. It means I’m at least managing to communicate my unease clearly. I hate that they made this film. I really do. Paddington is a great character in a series of lovely and beloved children’s books. While the character was never one hugely popular in my house growing up or with my own child, there’s no real intent there. There are thankfully a ton of great children’s books out there and this series just slipped through the cracks I guess. I vaguely remember reading a few of the stories to my nephew and they’re wonderful.

    Paddington

    All by way of saying that I don’t have any particular bone to pick; they haven’t trod on sacred ground in my case, but I have enough respect for the legions of fans of the character to be at least a little indignant on their behalf.

    I don’t know what this impulse to adapt every single successful character ever created for Hollywood is all about but I strongly suspect it rhymes with greed. And sounds like greed. Exactly like greed. It is greed.

    There are some unbelievably talented writers out there with truly original stories – go find them. Now. I’ll wait. Seriously. I’d be willing to wait quite a bit. There’s no rule stating how many films you must release every year. I’d cheerfully, gratefully, accept fewer films if they were fresher stories.

    Paddington

    The problem isn’t strictly that adapting previously written characters for the screen is lazy and lacking in ambition. The far bigger issue is the perceived necessity to make these characters now fit some pre-configured mold for feature films. It’s entirely possible to adapt works in ways that honor the source material and don’t slavishly adhere to a set formula. If you’re so hot to update Paddington for the modern cg-expecting audience, why not make it into a TV show? Or create a feature that tells several short vignettes. You really don’t need to fabricate a story that injects peril so that it can fit into your “90 minute kid movie” template.

    And now we come to it. There is a perception that all films must have arcs that place the characters in peril. It’s ridiculous. I don’t know how many kids movies have been ruined by the intentional ramping up of villains and dangerous situations in an effort to create a narrative, but it’s not a small number.

    Those of you who know the original stories better than I can feel free to correct me, but I don’t remember any villains in the series. There certainly wasn’t some mad Australian taxidermist after poor Paddington’s hide in anything I read. It’s a deeply disturbing premise. (In fact, I’ll risk spoiling things by warning tall people that Paddington, in addition to not having parents, loses the uncle that raised him within the first ten minutes. Definite potential for upsetting little ones.)

    Paddington

    You don’t need to make every kids story dangerous. I simply refuse to accept that there are children out there who read the Paddington books and said “Mummy, you know what would make this story even better? If I were truly concerned that Paddington might be skinned. Otherwise, what’s the point of all this? The story doesn’t move.”

    Other than that plotline, the story, the characters, the family dynamic – it’s all about what you’d expect – the whole thing is so formulaic. But it is all redeemed by the loving artistic touches. The whole movie in fact is saved because of art direction and visuals. Not the CG realistic visuals either, although they are really top shelf if completely lost in the helter skelter action. Paddington as a bear is a marvelous accomplishment and it’s too bad that this sort of thing isn’t really noteworthy at this point. In 2015 these visuals are de rigeur; that doesn’t make them any bit less impressive. It is some masterful design and execution.

    Paddington

    No, I’m talking about the creative use of flourishes that bring the whole production up in the eyes of the audience. The filmmakers earned my respect the hard way, frame by frame. No quarter was asked – they earned it, the obvious attention to detail and love and care for the work forcing me to take note of their accomplishments. They made it clear that this may be a trifle but they were damn well going to squeeze some value out of it.

    The acting is fine, nothing to write home about but solid. There’s an unusually large number of harry potter alums which seemed a bit odd until I found out that the film was produced by series vet David Heyman.

    Ben Whishaw, so excellent as the new Q in the recent Bond films is wonderful as the voice of Paddington. The part was originally cast with Colin Firth, but as the production developed, everyone involved realized they needed something else, probably someone more youthful, and it was absolutely the right call.

    PaddingtonI was pleasantly surprised to see Peter Capaldi pop up, since I wasn’t expecting him. He’s funny – he’s Capaldi – but the fact remains that the character could have been excised completely and you’d never miss him. I know the character of Mr. Curry, the disapproving neighbor is in the books, so I guess they had to include him, but he’s really surplus to the story. (Although just seeing him entering a red phone box is fairly amusing.)

    As for Nicole Kidman’s turn as the taxidermist, the less said the better.

    Paddington

    My daughter and I went to go see Paddington because we were having a special night out together and wanted to see a movie. I somewhat reluctantly picked it over Spongebob, bemoaning the lack of good family films out there and was quite pleasantly surprised by how enjoyable it was. Pleasant in fact is a very appropriate word for it – very British. It’s good, you’ll enjoy it. And then you’ll never think of it again.

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Pass

    The Representation Test Score: B (7 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    [schema type=”movie” url=”http://www.paddington.com/us/home/” name=”Paddington” description=”A young Peruvian bear travels to London in search of a home. Finding himself lost and alone at Paddington Station, he meets the kindly Brown family, who offer him a temporary haven.” director=”Paul King” actor_1=”Ben Whishaw” ]

    Main Cast Hugh Bonneville Henry Brown, Sally Hawkins Mary Brown, Julie Walters Mrs. Bird, Jim Broadbent Mr. Gruber
    Rating PG
    Release Date Fri 16 Jan 2015 UTC
    Director Paul King
    Genres Comedy, Family
    Plot A young Peruvian bear travels to London in search of a home. Finding himself lost and alone at Paddington Station, he meets the kindly Brown family, who offer him a temporary haven.
    Poster Paddington
    Runtime 95
    Tagline Please look after this bear. Thank you
    Writers Paul King (written by), Hamish McColl (screen story) …
    Year 2014
  • Big Hero 6 (2014)

    Big Hero 6 (2014)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    Could watch cuddly robot Baymax wander around onscreen pretty much all day. Cuteness may have led me to overvalue fairly typical story more.

    Big Hero 6

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of Big Hero 6:

    Been a busy few months here at the Now Very Bad offices, so I’m way behind on some films, including this fun one from Walt Disney Animation. This is especially odd since 1) we had eagerly awaited the film’s release based on the excellent trailers; 2) we saw it opening weekend, which was months ago – the film is now available on home video.

    Big Hero 6The unfortunate part about waiting so long to review it, however, is that I missed the opportunity to tell you all to go see it. My whole family loved Big Hero 6, and I’m sure yours will too.

    Big Hero 6Based on a Marvel comic (albeit with a ton of changes), Big Hero 6 is a rather simplistic hero story that gets away with the lack of originality because it’s so fun. I had a blast watching it, so I may have overlooked how derivative it is. A friend of mine disliked the film, which fairly stunned me until she explained what bothered her so much; the cheap plot device of having the protagonist lose a family member early in the tale. She’s absolutely right – it’s lazy writing and a gimmick that should have a 3-day waiting period.

    Big Hero 6Despite the familiarity of the story, which is a fairly straightforward hero coming of age progression, Big Hero 6 is ridiculously funny and enjoyable due to the character of Baymax, the healthcare robot designed by the dead-plot-element-walking family member of our hero, Hiro Hamada (Ryan Potter). Hiro’s hero journey may be a well-beaten path, but no hero has ever had a sidekick like Baymax.

    Big Hero 6Baymax is voiced by 30 Rock alum Scott Adsit with a comforting monotone and his movements were meant to resemble a “toddler with a full diaper”. It’s great comedic stuff and truly never gets old. You wish he were in every scene, and for the most part aren’t disappointed.

    Big Hero 6The rest of the characters seem to have been picked out of a box containing all of the elements to make a diverse, well-rounded team. When it comes to filling out the story of the team learning to trust each other and come together to blah, blah, blah, the story flags a little. This probably is perfectly fine comic book material, but as a film it’s a little pedestrian, particularly when there’s so much more fun to be had with the robot.

    Big Hero 6Visually the film is stunning. The art design of San Fransokyo alone is worth the price of admission.

    Big Hero 6

    I really loved Big Hero 6 and can’t wait for my copy of the Blu-ray to arrive in the next few days. I’m sure we’ll get plenty of opportunities to keep enjoying the world’s most cuddly robot. As a side note, we just got back from Disney World and the longest line we waited in all week was to meet Baymax & Hiro, so obviously the film’s a hit. (By the way, the long wait was totally worth it – hugging Baymax in the real world is exactly as awesome as you’d expect…)

    Big Hero 6

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Pass

    The Representation Test Score: C (4 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    [schema type=”movie” url=”http://movies.disney.com/big-hero-6/” name=”Big Hero 6″ description=”With all the heart and humor audiences expect from Walt Disney Animation Studios, “Big Hero 6” is an action-packed comedy adventure that introduces Baymax, a lovable, personal companion robot, who forms a special bond with robotics prodigy Hiro Hamada. When a devastating turn of events catapults them into the midst of a dangerous plot unfolding in the streets of San Fransokyo, Hiro turns to Baymax and his diverse group of friends— adrenaline junkie Go Go Tomago, neatnik Wasabi, chemistry whiz Honey Lemon and fanboy Fred — who transform into a band of unlikely heroes.” director=”Don Hall” ]

    Main Cast Ryan Potter Hiro (voice), Scott Adsit Baymax (voice), Jamie Chung Go Go (voice), T.J. Miller Fred (voice)
    Rating PG
    Release Date Fri 07 Nov 2014 UTC
    Director Don Hall, Chris Williams
    Genres Animation, Action, Adventure, Comedy, Family, Sci-Fi
    Plot The special bond that develops between plus-sized inflatable robot Baymax, and prodigy Hiro Hamada, who team up with a group of friends to form a band of high-tech heroes.
    Poster Big Hero 6
    Runtime 102
    Tagline
    Writers Jordan Roberts (screenplay) and, Daniel Gerson (screenplay) …
    Year 2014