Author: mfordfeeney

  • Now Very Bass: NVB No.01 Nikki Sixx (Mötley Crüe, Sixx:A.M.)

    Now Very Bass: NVB No.01 Nikki Sixx (Mötley Crüe, Sixx:A.M.)

    Despite this site being comprised primarily of movie reviews, it initially was to feature music reviews and appreciation. The name of this website, Now Very Bad, is actually taken from a musician joke*.

    I hope to expand on the musical focus of this site, and I’m starting right now with the first in a series on bass players: Now Very Bass. (Bass is my chosen instrument…)

    To kick off the series, I’m going to spotlight a bassist who is currently on his Final Tour with the band that made him famous and is one of my first influences: Nikki Sixx.

    Now Very Bass: NVB#01 Nikki Sixx (Mötley Crüe, Sixx:A.M.)

    From their start in the early 1980’s, Motley Crue was one of the loudest, hardest rock bands around. A large part of the driving rhythm of the band was provided by bassist Nikki Sixx. Of course, in the early days, Sixx attracted attention more for his on-stage antics, such as lighting himself on fire, than for his fretwork. And while the showmanship continues to be a huge part of the stage show over thirty years later, the same solid rhythm section that holds the band together today was already evident on the early records.

    Sixx’s playing style is similar to many hard rock bassists of the time, known for being more sturdy than flashy. Mostly lives in the groove with a fairly typical hard rock / metal focus on pumping the root. It helps that his partner is one of the finest rock drummers out there, Tommy Lee. Like AC/DC before them, the simplicity of the music on paper can lead to the impression that anyone can play it. Sure, you can hit all the notes, but that driving beat is a deceptively difficult thing to do well. Anyone who has been in a new band can attest to that.

    The self-produced debut album, Too Fast For Love, released in November 1981, may be more notable for Sixx’s writing than his bass playing. Sixx has always been a songwriter first, probably part of the selfless commitment to the songs over any showy playing. The record is rough around the edges, even after being remixed by Roy Thomas Baker, but the raw energy of the songs makes it a classic. Check out Live Wire, Public Enemy #1 or the title track.


    For the band’s second album, Shout At The Devil, the songwriting is improved and the overall sound is far more polished. Shout is one of the best metal albums of all time, as Sixx really came into his own as a songwriter. The bass playing is typically solid if not particularly noteworthy. During these early records he generally used B.C. Rich Warlock & Mockingbird basses.

    The time changes of the Theatre of Pain opener City Boy Blues are maybe a signal of some new styles creeping in with the band’s sound and complexity. Sadly, the bands extracurricular activities likely held them back from exploring any further, but the band tries out some interestingly classic rock/country tones on Raise Your Hands To Rock.

    For the cover of Brownsville Station’s Smokin’ in the Boys Room, Sixx employs some distinctive sliding octaves on the verses. This is also the first time he uses an 8-string bass to fill out the sound. It is very effective, and I have always been surprised he didn’t use 8 & 12 strings more live, particularly as he switched to Hamer basses at this time, and Hamer has a long history with those instruments.

    The album’s highlight, of course, is Home Sweet Home. The sonic field is altered significantly with the piano introduction, and there is some smooth movement of the bass line against the guitar solo.

    Due to lifestyle decisions and priorities at the time, the 4th record, Girls, Girls, Girls, finds the band treading water a bit. There are some great tracks, but there’s more than a little bit of filler. The title track and the opener, Wild Side, are classics, finding Sixx keeping up with Mick Mars at his sleaziest. The record is a bit uneven but the high points are among the band’s best. The lyrical high point has to be Dancing on Glass, with Sixx getting his junkie poetry on.

    The most interesting contribution by Sixx to the album, however, features no bass at all. The mostly instrumental piece Nona was written by Sixx for his grandmother and clocks in at less than 90 seconds, but it’s a beautiful piece with strings and offers a never to be repeated taste of a more mature direction for the Crue.

    Crue went with a totally new approach on the follow-up, their first sober album, Dr. Feelgood. They severed ties with Tom Werner, producer of their past three albums and went with the bombastic Bob Rock. Rock would produce Feelgood and the follow-up album in addition to all of the new material for the various compilations the band would put out for the next 15 years. The record sounds huge and the bass is more upfront than in any previous recording.

    The title track explodes with what I believe to be their first use of the Drop D tuning, and the chugging rhythm of the intro shows some very precise picking and great low-end. The guitars and basses are generally tuned down a half-step on all of the Motley albums, but the low D really sets the tone for what many consider their best album.

    Contrast this with the bluesy approach to Don’t Go Away Mad (Just Go Away), which sees Sixx filling in the verses with a very complementary approach.

    Sixx used Spector basses on both Girls & Feelgood, particularly Gibson Thunderbird-inspired Spectorbirds, but started to utilize some classic P-basses and would soon switch to Gibson Thunderbirds or Thunderbird variations by Ernie Ball & Schecter for the remainder of his career.

    The band added three new tracks for the semi-greatest hits album Decade of Decadence, most notable of these being the single Primal Scream, with a very riff-heavy bass line.

    But the record also collected some songs recorded for compilation albums, beginning a trend of releasing some of their finest and most challenging pieces on non-album releases. (Decade of Decadence has since gone out of print, with most of the “extra” tunes included on Supersonic And Demonic Relics.) Rock N’ Roll Junkie may have been a fairly straightforward song for a truly terrible movie (The Adventures of Ford Fairlane), but the bass is fantastic with a great groove.

    Most outstanding is the cover of Tommy Bolin’s Teaser. The song is absolutely perfect for the band and for Sixx’s playing. It was recorded for the Stairway to Heaven / Highway to Hell compilation for the 1989 Moscow Music Peace Festival (It’s a very interesting record, with then current artists performing at the festival – strong-armed by manager Doc McGhee – covering songs by artists who had died from substance abuse.) Sixx had been very vocal about his admiration for Bolin in the rock mags of the day, which was certainly influential in Geffen releasing a 2-cd box set, The Ultimate… in 1989. (I know Sixx’s endorsement was the reason I checked out Tommy Bolin, for which I am eternally grateful.)

    After the monster success of Feelgood, the band separated with singer Vince Neil and enlisted singer/guitarist John Corabi for the hugely underrated self-titled 1994 album, Mötley Crüe. While the album was a commercial failure, I consider it an artistic success. The band really challenged themselves with this one and I believe it is the first album in their career that is actually well-rounded. Even their greatest efforts before this had contained some amount of filler, and picking the greatest hits from the early albums is easy. And that may have been part of the real problem with the album – there’s no real single. Hooligan’s Holiday may have been a poor choice of single – it’s far from the best song on the album – but I’m not really sure what they’d have used instead.

    The record has a great bass sound, with lots of moving parts and some experimentation with distortion and other bass effects. The two guitar approach also leads to some interesting things. It is unfortunate that the times had changed and the landscape didn’t favor this music.

    In their tell-all book, The Dirt, everyone involved with the project has bitter and unpleasant memories about the follow-up album, Generation Swine, which I think is unfortunate, as I love the album. In some ways it’s one of my favorites. I get why they don’t like it – it’s schizophrenic, having started off as a Corabi album and ending up with Vince Neil back. There are too many cooks and everyone is doing what they want, but it makes for an interesting album – there are some great songs on here. I would have loved to have heard this with Corabi’s vocals – maybe his tenure with the band would be more fondly recalled.

    From a bass standpoint, it’s easily Sixx’s most experimental and exciting record. In addition to handling some of the lead vocals, there’s a lot of use of distortion and effects and different recording styles. The single Afraid starts with strummed bass chords as the main riff and it’s a great sound. On the tour Sixx brought out both Epiphone 5 strings and 12-strings from Hiroshigi Kids Guitar Company.

    He would also use 5 string basses on Enslaved & Bitter Pill, two new songs for 1998’s Greatest Hits.

    After touring in support of the Greatest Hits record, Lee would leave the band and be replaced for 2000’s New Tattoo. There is a real difference in that groove on the Mike Clink-produced album without Lee. Replacement drummer Randy Castillo (RIP) was a very fine drummer, but there is an ingredient x missing. He and Sixx hold down the rhythm, but there is very little groove and none of Lee’s creative embellishments. I never realized how good Lee was until I heard Crue without him. I’m no drummer, so I can’t even point to exactly what it is that he adds. He’s a seriously hard hitter, and tends to use the bass drum a lot and/or tune his drums a bit deeper to add to the “bass” of the band.

    This period is significant largely as the time in which Sixx was collaborating with other artists, including a significant songwriting partnership with James Michael. Michael has co-writing credit on 6 of the 10 originals on New Tattoo, as well as 2 of the 3 new original tunes on the 2005 compilation Red, White and Crüe. [Sick Love Song & the Japanese-only release I’m a Liar (and That’s the Truth)]. Note: The 3rd was also a Sixx collaboration – with band Simple Plan.

    James Michael would soon collaborate with Sixx on a more permanent basis in their new band Sixx:A.M. in 2006. They have released two studio albums to date with a third to be released in October 2014.

    The final Crue album, Saints of Los Angeles, was released in 2008 and featured the original lineup. The title track is classic Crue and the album is very solid. James Michael took on the producer role for the project and the bass never sounded better. Every song on the album was written by the Sixx:A.M. members and Marti Frederiksen with a few co-writing credits from Mick Mars and one from Tommy Lee.

    The latest (and last?) Crue song, All Bad Things Must Come To An End is currently being played on their Final Tour and is featured in the promo video below:

    Nikki Sixx has provided the pulse of one of the biggest rock bands in history and redefined the role of the bass player in the band. His songwriting has made him a central figure in the rock landscape and inspired countless musicians.

    *Joke has been told many times over the years, but goes (roughly) as follows:

    A party of explorers are travelling through the jungle when they hear a steady, rhythmic drumming. Curious, they ask their guide what the drumming is about. The guide replies, “When drums stop, very bad.”

    They continue their trek but the drums keep pounding away; again they inquire about the sound and are again told, “When drums stop, very bad.”

    They press on, nearly driven mad by the incessant drumming, when suddenly the pounding stops. The explorers are surprised and look expectantly to the guide who says, “Now very bad…now bass solo.”

    [schema type=”person” name=”Nikki Sixx” orgname=”Mötley Crüe” url=”http://www.motley.com” ]

  • Dreamscape (1984)

    Dreamscape (1984)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    Not at all bad, but could have been great. All the elements are here for fantastic sci-fi movie, but they went more for low-quality horror.

    Dreamscape

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of Dreamscape:

    What a missed opportunity this movie is. It’s so close to being great – it just doesn’t quite get there and may have missed out on good in the attempt.

    Dreamscape

    Dennis Quaid plays Alex Gardner, who was a psychic wiz-kid in studies with Dr. Paul Novotny (Max von Sydow) before he tired of being a test subject and went out into the world to use his gifts to become a petty gambler. Just as he’s pushed his luck too far he is recruited/kidnapped to pick up where he left off with his former mentor who is now working in the area of shared dreams. Novotny, along with Jane DeVries (Kate Capshaw) is trying to combat nightmares and sleep disorders by linking a psychic to a dreamer where the psychic can diagnose and/or cure the disorder. Of course the mind control possibilities are endless, which is why the research is government funded and shadowy power broker Bob Blair (Christopher Plummer) is maneuvering to get the President of the United States (Eddie Albert) under control.

    Dreamscape

    The potential is all there – it’s a great setup. It sounds better than it is, though and there are a few reasons why:

    1. The marketing is misleading. All of the descriptions I’ve read from the press materials make it seem as though the President is trapped inside the dreamworld and needs to be rescued. That’s just factually untrue, but would have made a more interesting story.
    2. This impression is supported by the gorgeous poster by master artist Drew Struzan, which may be the best thing about the movie. Look at this thing; tell me this doesn’t look exactly like the sequel to Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom – which came out only a few months earlier and also featured Struzan’s artwork.Dreamscape
    3. The effects are simply dreadful. I really try hard not to pick on older films for outdated effects, but these are fairly poor even for 1984.
    4. The tone is all wrong. The filmmakers seem unsure if they are making a sci-fi thriller, a political thriller or a horror picture. The mix of all three cheapens all.

    Dreamscape

    This last reason is the main problem with the film. It’s less than 100 minutes and that’s not a lot of time to make a good mind-bending movie. So they don’t. There’s hints of some deep psychological/philosophical stuff, but they don’t run with it and that’s a fatal mistake. Instead it lives more in the horror genre where it does ok, but it’s not as effective as other genre films. This was the second film released with the new PG-13 rating and I suspect they were a little unclear on who the audience was going to be and therefore how far to go.

    Dreamscape

    As sci-fi it’s pretty good; as a thriller it stinks. There’s actually a chase scene on a horse racetrack. There’s no real intrigue – you know who the bad guy is and what his game is almost instantly. The pseudo-gangsters aren’t threatening and the whole world seems underpopulated. I don’t know if the low budget is the reason, but the whole affair feels quite small-scale – lots of mostly empty rooms and barren sets with few actors.

    Dreamscape

    There are some other frustrating things about the picture. They got maestro Maurice Jarre to do the score; but he insisted on doing an electronic score. So close to greatness…

    Dreamscape

    Dreamscape is a terribly frustrating picture because it coulda/shoulda been so good. It is still an entertaining movie and I enjoyed it, but the story just doesn’t live up to its premise. There’s a great movie in here, they just couldn’t quite coax it out, and by focusing on the horror elements they cheapened the story. I’d say it’s desperately in need of a remake, but the ground was later covered so much better by The Matrix, Dark City and particularly Inception that there may not be enough legroom. I haven’t read The Dream Master, the novel by Roger Zelazny on which this picture was partly based, but it sounds like it may have enough meat on the bone to justify a re-imaging for another film.

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Fail

    The Representation Test Score: D (2 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    Dreamscape Representation Test
    [schema type=”movie” name=”Dreamscape” description=”A young psychic on the run from himself is recruited by the government to save the US president whose mind is trapped inside the dreamworld.” director=”Joseph Ruben” actor_1=”Dennis Quaid” actor_2=”Max von Sydow” actor_3=”Christopher Plummer” actor_4=”Kate Capshaw”]

    Main Cast Dennis Quaid Alex Gardner, Max von Sydow Doctor Paul Novotny, Christopher Plummer Bob Blair, Eddie Albert The President
    Rating PG-13
    Release Date Wed 15 Aug 1984 UTC
    Director Joseph Ruben
    Genres Adventure, Sci-Fi, Thriller, Horror
    Plot A young psychic on the run from himself is recruited by the government to save the US president whose mind is trapped inside the dreamworld.
    Poster Dreamscape
    Runtime 99
    Tagline Alex Gardner has an extraordinary gift. To keep it may cost him his life…
    Writers David Loughery (story), David Loughery (screenplay) …
    Year 1984
  • Red Dawn (1984)

    Red Dawn (1984)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    Much more serious than I remember this being. Decades of people yelling “Wolverines” made me remember the movie as campy & it really isn’t.

    Red Dawn

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of Red Dawn:

    Wow, they don’t waste a lot of time on this one – there’s a blitz of exposition blasted on screen too fast to read, then about two minutes of seeing a couple of teenagers, without even bothering to name them before the shooting starts. The action starts in about minute four. Within 6 minutes it’s a full war. I wonder if director John Milius was double-parked or something.

    Red Dawn

    Red Dawn is possibly most noteworthy for being the first film released with the new PG-13 rating. (The Flamingo Kid earned the rating first, but was delayed in coming to market.) What’s interesting about this distinction is that in no way should this have been rated anything but R, whether PG-13 existed at the time or not. I’m a firm believer that any movie containing kids killing kids should earn an immediate R. (I’m looking at you, Hunger Games…) And this is an exceptionally violent movie by any measure (including the tasteless on-screen “Carnage Counter” feature on the DVD), considered at the time to be the most violent movie ever released with a rate of 2.23 acts of violence per minute.

    Red Dawn

    It’s a serious movie. Having not seen this since the 80’s I had vague recollections of this being a slightly more violent The Outsiders. But the age of the protagonists is the only thing that separates Red Dawn from a full-on war film, and a rough one at that. Sure, it has a Outsiders-styled cast, but since the movie spends a minuscule amount of time learning anything about these characters, they could just as easily be 22 year old soldiers. It’s a good thing so many of the cast members went on to be famous, because if I didn’t recognize the actors I’d have no way of telling the characters apart.

    Red Dawn

    It’s fascinating to see a war breaking out in North America, which is really the big draw with this picture. Ever since the introduction of nuclear weapons, it’s been hard to imagine a World War III fought with conventional weaponry and so Red Dawn plays out like an interesting “what if ” scenario. Admittedly, we learn over the course of the picture that limited nuclear strikes have taken place, wiping out major strategic cities, but this bit of exposition is delivered halfway through the picture during a rare non-violent moment and so you might miss it.

    Red Dawn

    And that’s really where a strength becomes a weakness. One of the interesting stylistic choices of the film is leaving these kids so completely in the dark, cut off from all information. It is a very effective bit of storytelling for the first act of the film, but it isn’t really sustainable, so the solution to this problem literally falls out of the sky in the form of downed fighter pilot Lt. Col. Andrew Tanner (Powers Boothe). Tanner is able to interject some perspective and info about what is happening in the outside world. It’s a necessary character to introduce, since the audience has surely been wondering why the Russians and Cubans are bothering with this little town in Colorado of seemingly no strategic importance. But it’s too little too late. We want to see more of what is happening elsewhere. It has been really interesting to see what goes on in one small town in an event such as this and it gives the story weight. But the tantalizing taste of the larger struggle that Tanner’s info suggests made me impatient with the limited story of one group of insurgents. The efforts of these kids are fascinating but credulity starts to wane as the story progresses.

    Red Dawn

    I’m a sucker for a Cold War story and Red Dawn produces images and a scenario not previously explored. It partially slakes my desire for a Cold War land war film. (I’d love it if someone would produce a film version of Tom Clancy’s Red Storm Rising.) It’s far from a perfect film (I’m not even sure it’s a good film) – it has huge pacing problems, little to no characterization, no real introduction and a non-ending. It also feels a bit like right-wing propaganda with a touch of Lord of the Flies brutality. But it is a unique picture that is better than I remembered it, and I love the Basil Poledouris score.

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Fail

    The Representation Test Score: C (4 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    Red Dawn Representation Test

    [schema type=”movie” name=”Red Dawn” description=”It is the dawn of World War III. In mid-western America, a group of teenagers bands together to defend their town, and their country, from invading Soviet forces.” director=”John Milius” actor_1=”Patrick Swayze” actor_2=”C. Thomas Howell” actor_3=”Lea Thompson” actor_4=”Charlie Sheen” actor_5=”Darren Dalton” actor_6=”Jennifer Grey” actor_7=”Brad Savage” actor_8=”Doug Toby”]

    Main Cast Patrick Swayze Jed, C. Thomas Howell Robert, Lea Thompson Erica, Charlie Sheen Matt
    Rating PG-13
    Release Date Fri 10 Aug 1984 UTC
    Director John Milius
    Genres Action, Drama, War
    Plot It is the dawn of World War III. In mid-western America, a group of teenagers bands together to defend their town, and their country, from invading Soviet forces.
    Poster Red Dawn
    Runtime 114
    Tagline A full scale military invasion by foreign troops begins. Total surprise. Almost total success . . . .
    Writers Kevin Reynolds (story), John Milius (screenplay) …
    Year 1984
  • The Abyss (1989)

    The Abyss (1989)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    More than a little unclear, it is nonetheless a fascinating & thrilling underwater sci-fi adventure. Great story & even better execution…

    The Abyss

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of The Abyss:

    The Abyss is one of those films that may be remembered solely for their special effects. Indeed, when I was putting together this post, after much consideration I realized I had to use the water tentacle “face” as the featured image as it is so indelibly linked with the film. Until now I never actually sat through the whole picture, and that scene is more or less the only bit of the film I was familiar with as a result.

    The Abyss

    Having now watched it properly (I caught bits and pieces over the years) I think it is a real shame that the legacy of the film has been reduced to its effects. The movie is a whole lot more than a test kitchen for Terminator 2.

    The Abyss

    In some ways, James Cameron’s film isn’t terribly original. It could certainly be argued that the movie is a typical sci-fi actioner, but underwater. It certainly does follow many action film conventions, and I think the plot of the picture is significantly weakened when you reflect on just how much it relies on the action taking place on the edge of a cliff. It quite literally is a cliffhanger picture, with the only variation being the location of the cliff as part of an underwater trench. But it is an unique story, even if it does follow some well-traveled paths to get there.

    The Abyss

    An American nuclear submarine crashes following a run-in with an unidentified floating object and for reasons that are explained quickly and not entirely satisfactorily, the rescue is entrusted to an underwater oil drilling team. They’ll be supervised by a crack team of Navy SEALS (who can somehow get to the area when the regular military rescue team cannot), led by Lieutenant Hiram Coffey (Cameron regular Michael Biehn), who have their own (not entirely explained) agenda.

    The Abyss

    The drilling operation works something like this: the Benthic Explorer, on the surface is attached via some type of umbilical tether to the underwater drilling platform the Deep Core, over 500 meters beneath the surface. This was a little confusing to me, not being even moderately familiar with this technology. Generally that wouldn’t be a problem, but the interaction between the two vessels is a fairly major plot point and its one area where I felt the movie really failed. I’m not a huge fan of scenes of obvious exposition, but sometimes they are really necessary. A two minute scene showing a diagram of the connection or a map would have been hugely helpful. There’s a huge storm coming that affects everything, not to mention a potential military incident between the US & Russia over the recovery of the sunken ship due to its location, yet I never really had a clear idea where this all was taking place. A year after The Abyss, one of the greatest cold-war naval films of all time, The Hunt for Red October, did a fantastic job of illustrating its concepts with excellent exposition. I wonder if the filmmakers took any lessons from this film.

    The Abyss

    The human element of the story is ably handled by Virgil “Bud” Brigman (Ed Harris) and Dr. Lindsey Brigman (Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio), estranged spouses in charge of different areas of the drilling and rescue operation. The two actors have a nice chemistry, but the show is pretty much stolen by Michael Biehn. The studio unsuccessfully lobbied to get him a Best Supporting Actor nomination, which he absolutely deserved. His Lt. Coffey is suffering from high pressure nervous syndrome, and had a more marquee actor turned in this paranoid performance they certainly would have been recognized.

    The Abyss

    I haven’t even really gotten into what happens in the story, including the sci-fi elements, because they really are better experienced firsthand. If you’ve somehow avoided knowing what happens for 25 years (I did) I’m not going to be the one to spoil it. The story and the film are very good. It’s an exciting adventure story and the underwater setting makes for a great picture.

    Unfortunately, the ending bites. This is almost certainly explained by the severe trimming the picture underwent to get to a more reasonable runtime of 140 minutes. The Special Edition cut of the film that made it to video restores another half an hour of footage that apparently makes a huge difference in rounding out the ending. I’ll try to screen it and update this review soon.

    The Abyss

    Cameron and DP Mikael Salomon do a great  job of creating the claustrophobic feel of the underwater setting, with an early sequence as the rescue crew boards the stricken submarine particularly noteworthy. Salomon shoots a scene from the first person perspective of crewman Jammer Willis, with his labored breathing intensifying, and it is one of the most tense and suspenseful sequences I’ve ever seen.

    Apparently it was a nightmare shoot, with actors breaking down and nearly drowning on occasion, and the film is probably single-handedly responsible for Cameron’s reputation as a very difficult director to work with. The final product is wonderful, though.

    The Abyss

    The Abyss is a unique film and another great example of James Cameron’s singular vision. The film stops short of being the greatest underwater picture of all time – I don’t think anything will ever top Das Boot – but it’s right up there. Had the filmmakers been allowed to make the longer picture they intended, the theatrical cut would likely be a much more complete film. As it stands, it is a very good if somewhat confused film with an unsatisfying and simplistic ending. Gorgeous visuals in a unique setting make this easily recommended.

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Pass

    The Representation Test Score: B (7 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    The Abyss Representation Test
    [schema type=”movie” name=”The Abyss” description=”A civilian diving team are enlisted to search for a lost nuclear submarine and face danger while encountering an alien aquatic species.” director=”James Cameron” actor_1=”Ed Harris” actor_2=”Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio” actor_3=”Michael Biehn” ]

    Main Cast Ed Harris Virgil ‘Bud’ Brigman, Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio Lindsey Brigman, Michael Biehn Lt. Hiram Coffey, Leo Burmester Catfish De Vries
    Rating PG-13
    Release Date Wed 09 Aug 1989 UTC
    Director James Cameron
    Genres Adventure, Drama, Sci-Fi, Thriller
    Plot A civilian diving team are enlisted to search for a lost nuclear submarine and face danger while encountering an alien aquatic species.
    Poster The Abyss
    Runtime 139
    Tagline A place on earth more awesome than anywhere in space.
    Writers James Cameron (written by)
    Year 1989
  • Alice in Wonderland (2010)

    Alice in Wonderland (2010)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    The 2001 version of Planet of the Apes ensures that nothing else can ever be called Tim Burton’s worst movie, but this sure does its best…

    Alice in Wonderland (2010)

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of Alice in Wonderland:

    Where do you want to start with this one? The 3D conversion, the disturbing art direction, the overdone cg, the serious tone, the efforts to turn this into an epic battle picture?

    Alice in Wonderland (2010)

    I’ve come up with a term for movies made post Lord of the Rings (LOTR) that needlessly and without good reason inject large-scale battle sequences with tons of CG combatants; such films are trying to win the LOTRy. I know, terrible joke – but I needed something to describe this rampant phenomenon. It’s really out of hand – movies are adding massive battles that are supposed to impress with their scope, when in actuality they just numb you with unreal looking scenes of seemingly endless armies of CG characters, which require you to care about none of them. It just ends up being an expensive and time consuming sequence with no actual importance to the picture. Worse yet, these scenes are usually supposed to be the climax of the film. Alice in Wonderland isn’t the worst example of this phenomenon, by far, but it may be the most inexcusable, since it is so completely out of place in this story.

    Alice in Wonderland (2010)

    The whole picture is an exercise in CG run amuck. Not only is virtually every character and location digitally realized – there’s not a single practical effect in sight – Burton uses CG to wildly distort even the human characters. I may never forgive the man for the gross enlargement of Helena Bonham Carter’s head. He even manages to make Crispin Glover look more creepy than usual, no small feat.

    Alice in Wonderland (2010)

    I simply cannot fathom what was going through the filmmaker’s heads when they decided on this art direction. It’s mental. Hideously ugly and intentionally bizarre, seemingly just for the sake of being “weird”. They also chose to give the characters full names, each more absurd than the one before. Even the cake has a name…

    Alice in Wonderland (2010)

    Depp is a nightmare. The character design is dreadful, the characterization more so, and the decision to make the Mad Hatter a main character is worst of all. Never hire stars before planning a script – you end up writing the role to the level of star appeal instead of the other way around. I get the idea of the mercury poisoning being the reason for his madness and that’s why he looks like that; it’s an interesting idea, but ultimately unnecessary. After all, everyone else in the world is mad, so why does he need a special story? And what’s with the whole Glaswegian accent?

    Alice in Wonderland (2010)

    The whole story of Alice returning to Underland is frankly a mess and unnecessarily complicated. The serious storyline of a fractured world torn apart by warring monarchs – ridiculous. Worse, it strips all of the fun from the thing. Shouldn’t a story set in this world be more enjoyable? The filmmakers envisioned this not as a reimagining and not as a sequel, but something else entirely. And it’s something else, alright…

    Alice in Wonderland (2010)

    But it’s not all bad, which is why this review is written more out of frustration than dislike. Mia Wasikowska is absolutely lovely and near perfect casting. She is very charismatic and works even with the parts of the story which pose her as a warrior, even if she’s frankly more interesting in London than in Underland.

    Alice in Wonderland (2010)

    The movie is at its best at the outset, when it places Alice against the backdrop of high society, where the people are even more bizarre than any creature she will encounter in the next 100 minutes. The nods to Wonderland characters depicted in London society is a great tip of the hat and gives the thing a Wizard of Oz dreamlike quality.

    The other time that the movie really frustrates you by showing the potential is when they show some flashbacks to Alice’s previous visit as a child – this is the movie they should have made.

    Alice in Wonderland (2010)

    Finally, one spoiler-filled thought – what is up with the ending? I love that Alice has become a confident young woman not content with the life her society has carved out for her, but it’s ruined a bit when you realize that she has decided to head off to China as a colonial trader. That’s disturbing. Will the sequel find Alice exporting opium?

    I find it extremely hard to believe that this is Burton’s most successful picture, which really only highlights the folly of judging movie success on dollars alone. These metrics should always have been based on ticket sales, not receipts, otherwise what’s the point? (In fact, adjusted for inflation, Batman was a much bigger success.)

    Burton the great adapter is a bad role for someone so talented and creative. He has always been at his best with material he wrote or helped to develop. Alice in Wonderland is a supremely frustrating film and a missed opportunity. The only rousing success of the picture is the score by Danny Elfman, which is beautiful and haunting in that Elfman way.

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Pass

    The Representation Test Score: B (7 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    Alice in Wonderland (2010) [schema type=”movie” url=”http://movies.disney.com/alice-in-wonderland-2010″ name=”Alice in Wonderland” description=”Nineteen-year-old Alice returns to the magical world from her childhood adventure, where she reunites with her old friends and learns of her true destiny: to end the Red Queen’s reign of terror.” director=”Tim Burton” actor_1=”Mia Wasikowska” actor_2=”Johnny Depp” actor_3=”Helena Bonham Carter” actor_4=”Anne Hathaway” actor_5=”Crispin Glover”]

    Main Cast Mia Wasikowska Alice Kingsleigh, Johnny Depp Mad Hatter, Helena Bonham Carter Red Queen, Anne Hathaway White Queen
    Rating PG
    Release Date Fri 05 Mar 2010 UTC
    Director Tim Burton
    Genres Adventure, Family, Fantasy
    Plot Nineteen-year-old Alice returns to the magical world from her childhood adventure, where she reunites with her old friends and learns of her true destiny: to end the Red Queen’s reign of terror.
    Poster Alice in Wonderland
    Runtime 108
    Tagline You’re invited to a very important date 3/5/10
    Writers Linda Woolverton (screenplay), Lewis Carroll (books)
    Year 2010