Author: mfordfeeney

  • X-Men: Days of Future Past (2014)

    X-Men: Days of Future Past (2014)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    As much as I would have preferred a straight sequel to First Class, this is a very solid & fun movie. Sigh of relief – wary of time travel.

    X-Men: Days of Future Past

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of X-Men: Days of Future Past:

    Another X-Men movie, another Wolverine love-fest. Oh well. If it wasn’t a deal-killer by now it never will be.

    X-Men: Days of Future Past

    X-Men: Days of Future Past is based on another Claremont Classic (actually, Chris Claremont/John Byrne) from 1981. I find it interesting that Marvel has no compunction with mining their vast comic libraries for storylines when it comes time to make films – and why should they? It’s simply interesting that DC Comics takes an entirely different approach, scripting new stories for their films. Not saying one is better than the other, but it is almost certainly one of the reasons there are so many more Marvel movies.

    X-Men: Days of Future Past

    I absolutely adored X-Men: First Class, and was digusted that they felt the need to go back to the well again with the original trilogy cast again after such a successful reboot. On top of that, time travel? Time travel is among the laziest of writer tools up there with cloning and mutation. Oh wait…

    X-Men: Days of Future Past

    So I was beyond thrilled with how good Days of Future Past turned out. True, it swaps Kitty Pryde as a main character from the comic with Wolverine, and you all know by now how I feel about the Wolverine-obsession. (Side note: shouldn’t this insistence on putting the character in everything have a name by now, like Bronies? I’ve got it! Wolvere-runs? Wolveretread?) But it actually works best from a plot standpoint to have the dude with claws Wolvereturn to the past.

    X-Men: Days of Future Past

    The idea is that in the future the mutants are getting wiped out by Sentinels, robots that can morph and adapt basically in any way that will best kill the mutants. So they can take on mutant powers. The fact that this is patently absurd and poor science doesn’t matter – because they are so cool! Great effects.

    Unfortunately, for reasons that aren’t satisfactorily explained, the Sentinels are killing people too, and the world has been ravaged (for reasons that aren’t satisfactorily explained). So the remaining mutants, including the once-again BFFs Magneto & Professor X, hole up in a temple in China to make their last stand while Kitty projects Wolverine’s consciousness back in time where he will solicit the help of the younger versions of these characters (the cast from First Class) in order to stop the event that set history on this path.

    X-Men: Days of Future Past

    Let me state now, lest I go too far and pick apart this movie that I loved it. It was exciting and funny and a really good time. I have a bunch of questions about it and there were a number of things that I thought were simply sloppy time-travel type stuff, but I really don’t want to get bogged down in it. Comic books are full to the brim of fuzzy logic and questionable plot elements, but it doesn’t stop them from being fun, and so I really just went with the flow on this one. There’s more than enough great stuff to make you overlook a few implausible ideas.

    X-Men: Days of Future Past

    The acting is absolutely top shelf. I’m overjoyed that they spend most of their Days in the Past not the Future. It’s far more interesting, the actors are better and it’s simply fresher. Seeing Halle Berry et al saunter on screen was a drag at the beginning of the movie. There is nothing more to tell there. The past storylines are so much richer. Spending First Class in the 60’s and now Future Past in the 70’s, I’m spoiling nothing by assuming that the Apocalypse storyline of the next film will be set in the 1980’s. And that’s fantastic. The 70’s setting makes this film really interesting and provides a great playground for the writers.

    X-Men: Days of Future Past

    The new characters are wonderful: Peter Dinklage is his usual amazing self as Bolivar Trask, inventor of the Sentinels. The movie is very nearly stolen – no, make that definitely stolen – by Evan Peters as Quicksilver. His scenes have to be the most enjoyable in the whole picture, although I retain a real fondness for Nicholas Hoult’s Beast. There are a bunch of new to film mutants shown in the future, but they’ll mean more to comic fans than newcomers and I wouldn’t want to spoil the fun, anyway.

    As with First Class, though, the movie really belongs to James McAvoy & Michael Fassbender as Charles & Eric, respectively. The relationship between these two characters is even more intriguing in this film, and McAvoy in particular shines.

    X-Men: Days of Future Past

    Days of Future Past is a well-written and better-executed film, a high-water mark for comic movies. You probably already know this, as this review is a touch on the late side, but if you haven’t gotten to it, make time. It looks great on the big screen, where it belongs.

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Fail

    The Representation Test Score: C (5 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    Representation Test

    [schema type=”movie” name=”X-Men: Days of Future Past” description=”The X-Men send Wolverine to the past in a desperate effort to change history and prevent an event that results in doom for both humans and mutants.” director=”Bryan Singer” ]

    Main Cast Patrick Stewart Professor X, Ian McKellen Magneto, Hugh Jackman Logan/Wolverine, James McAvoy Charles Xavier
    Rating PG-13
    Release Date Fri 23 May 2014 UTC
    Director Bryan Singer
    Genres Action, Adventure, Fantasy, Sci-Fi
    Plot The X-Men send Wolverine to the past in a desperate effort to change history and prevent an event that results in doom for both humans and mutants.
    Poster X-Men: Days of Future Past
    Runtime 131
    Tagline His past. Our future.
    Writers Simon Kinberg (screenplay), Jane Goldman (story) …
    Year 2014
  • How To Train Your Dragon 2 (2014)

    How To Train Your Dragon 2 (2014)

    140 Character Movie Review: #140RVW

    Unnecessary but solid sequel extends the story without necessarily enhancing it. Focus on making epic franchise distracts from the humor…

    How to Train Your Dragon 2

    Spoiler-free Review of How To Train Your Dragon 2:

    British author Cressida Cowell has written a dozen books in the How To Train Your Dragon series, so I suppose my assertion that this sequel isn’t strictly necessary may seem ridiculous. Nevertheless, I persist that as much as I loved the original, it was a complete story that didn’t really need to go any further.

    How to Train Your Dragon 2 I do realize that there is a tv show as well as some straight to video releases. I have watched a few of them and they’re pretty good for tv. They are on an excellent production level and even have most of the same voice talent, which is remarkable. This isn’t what Saturday morning cartoons were like when I was a kid. TV cartoon versions of movies, even animated movies, fell off hugely in quality, budget and by virtually any other measure.

    How to Train Your Dragon 2 The setting and premise are perfect for more stories. I’m just not sure they are big screen stories. There’s an expectation, entirely reasonable in my mind, that movies you shuffle off to the theater for and shell out cash had better be significant. It puts a lot of pressure on filmmakers to produce epic spectacles.

    How to Train Your Dragon 2 And that’s really what’s happening here. Instead of a cute little movie about a boy and his friend, they’ve turned this thing into part 2 of a grand saga. Writer/director Dean DeBlois, who co-wrote/co-directed the original, even insisted on turning this into a trilogy as a condition of making a sequel. Sigh. What is it with trilogies? Do we have this spot in our brains that isn’t happy unless stories fit into three parts?

    How to Train Your Dragon 2 DeBlois has stated that his model for the film is Star Wars: Episode V – The Empire Strikes Back. C’mon, son. You don’t say that. You don’t even think that. Don’t invite comparisons to the greatest sequel ever made. Everyone aspires to equal Empire when they make a sequel, but what they really mean is “let’s get dark and serious”. Persistently forgetting that what makes Empire so good isn’t that it’s darker; it’s just such an amazing story. And this isn’t the franchise to go dark with.

    How to Train Your Dragon 2 Mind you, I love what they’ve done here. It is epic and it is well done. It just isn’t all that fun and even less funny.

    How to Train Your Dragon 2 The visuals are absolutely stunning. It is simply gorgeous and the character models are among the best CG I’ve ever seen. But I just can’t get past the fact that they’re making a cartoon. This level of animated brilliance has indeed produced possibly the best dragon movie yet. But it’s still populated with these goofy looking people. The better the backgrounds, fire effects and animation gets, the more ridiculous it is that we’re stuck looking at these big-eyed round faces. CG animation continues to evolve with every new picture in every facet except for the people. It’s like they got to a certain point of reasonably good looking caricatures of humans and stopped. I’m guessing because every time they’ve tried the next step, it looks creepy. Better to keep them looking like cartoons where they won’t be expected to be facsimiles of life. I understand that, I suppose, but it does mean that every studio’s output now looks identical. Worse, I’m left with the feeling that we’re in a transition stage and when we finally reach the next step of reproducing CG actors, all this stuff won’t play.

    How to Train Your Dragon 2 How To Train Your Dragon 2 is a really good movie, I don’t mean to be negative or imply that it isn’t. I was impressed with it and did enjoy it. I simply didn’t enjoy it in the same way as the first film. It wasn’t hugely funny – it’s not that the jokes weren’t successful, it just seemed like there weren’t many of them. It’s not a fantasy action comedy; it’s a comedic fantasy actioner. Think Dragonslayer, not Ghostbusters. Nothing wrong with that (I LOVE Dragonslayer). It’s just not at all what I was expecting. I imagine I’ll like it much better the second time when I know what I’ll be getting. Because it really is a good looking film.

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Fail

    The Representation Test Score: B (7 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/) Representation Test

    [schema type=”movie” name=”How To Train Your Dragon 2″ description=”When Hiccup and Toothless discover an ice cave that is home to hundreds of new wild dragons and the mysterious Dragon Rider, the two friends find themselves at the center of a battle to protect the peace.” director=”Dean DeBlois” ]

    Main Cast Jay Baruchel Hiccup (voice), Cate Blanchett Valka (voice), Gerard Butler Stoick (voice), Craig Ferguson Gobber (voice)
    Rating PG
    Release Date Fri 13 Jun 2014 UTC
    Director Dean DeBlois
    Genres Animation, Action, Adventure, Comedy, Family, Fantasy
    Plot When Hiccup and Toothless discover an ice cave that is home to hundreds of new wild dragons and the mysterious Dragon Rider, the two friends find themselves at the center of a battle to protect the peace.
    Poster How to Train Your Dragon 2
    Runtime 102
    Tagline
    Writers Dean DeBlois (written by), Cressida Cowell (“How to Train Your Dragon” book series)
    Year 2014
  • The Food Guide to Love (2013)

    The Food Guide to Love (2013)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    Dublin-set rom-com won’t win awards or set bar for originality, but leads Richard Coyle & Leonor Watling are beyond charming & it’s funny…

    The Food Guide to Love

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of The Food Guide to Love:

    Being a huge fan of the now defunct BBC show Coupling, I’d watch Richard Coyle in just about anything. (Although I’m not going to start watching Crossbones, NBC’s silly-looking pirate drama with John Malkovich as Blackbeard. That thing has early cancellation written all over it.) As neurotic, sex-obsessed accountant Jeff Murcock on that comedy, Coyle was charming, funny and simply fun to watch. Sadly, he seems a bit stuck in TV, having trouble breaking into films only in small roles.

    The Food Guide to Love

    The Food Guide to Love is a feature, although everything about it screams straight-to-video. Not because it’s not competent – it’s quite good. There’s just an overabundance of rom-coms and only the ones with big stars seem to have legs. Coyle and co-star Leonor Watling deserve the attention, but I fear this little indie film won’t garner much.

    The Food Guide to Love

    Shot in Dublin by Spanish writer/directors Dominic Harari & Teresa Pelegri, it’s a good looking movie – great footage of the city, even if the story really could be set just about anywhere (it was written for London).  The opening titles are nearly as long as the cast list, as this is one of those films that seems to be sponsored and funded by 30 different film agencies, production companies & distributors, but that’s ok because they do a nice job of setting up the main character of Coyle as Oliver Byrne, a hip and popular food writer.

    The Food Guide to Love

    Seemingly incapable of maintaining a relationship beyond 6 months, Oliver meets cute with Bibiana (Watling), a smart and politically active Spaniard who is not impressed by his fame or with what she considers his shallow interests. There’s lots of great and funny material here, and if this film starred Hugh Grant or Anne Hathaway or similar, it could be a hit. It may be just as well that it doesn’t, as that imaginary film certainly wouldn’t cast Irish actors Bronagh Gallagher & Simon Delaney in good if too small roles.

    The Food Guide to Love

    The best moments of the film actually don’t concern the love story at all, but focus on the relationship between Oliver and his parents. I actually found a few of these scenes very moving and they have stuck with me.

    The film is good if not laced with originality, and really the only flaw in it is a somewhat jarring tendency to skip forward in time. You may get three scenes set over a single meal, then zoom forward a few years. It’s a little odd; feels like they could have lengthened the film a little bit to insert a few transitional scenes. But it’s a minor point; the length of the film is just right in terms of keeping your interest. Recommended.

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Fail

    The Representation Test Score: B (9 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    Representation Test

    [schema type=”movie” name=”The Food Guide to Love” description=”A dysfunctional love story about an Irish food writer and a politically committed Spanish woman. Richard Coyle and Leonor Watling star.” director=”Dominic Harari, Teresa Pelegri” actor_1=”Richard Coyle” ]

    Main Cast Richard Coyle Oliver, Leonor Watling Bibiana, Ciara Bailey Polly, Michelle Beamish Maxine
    Rating R
    Release Date Wed 18 Dec 2013 UTC
    Director Dominic Harari, Teresa Pelegri
    Genres Comedy, Romance
    Plot
    Poster
    Runtime
    Tagline
    Writers Teresa Pelegri &, Dominic Harari
    Year 2013
  • Ghostbusters II (1989)

    Ghostbusters II (1989)

    #140RVW

    Watered-down, kid-friendly sequel proves that with enough talented people phoning it in, you can still sometimes come up with something ok.

    Ghostbusters II

    What’s more:

    Ghostbusters II is not a bad movie. It has the unenviable job of following up a nearly perfect movie. It can’t hope to equal the quality or success of the first film, and doesn’t.

    Ghostbusters II
    “Hairless pets. Weird.”

    Like so many sequels, the biggest problem is that it’s completely unnecessary and a blatant cash cow. There was nothing more to say, nothing original to add, and it doesn’t. The creative team behind the first film, (writers Dan Aykroyd & Harold Ramis and director Ivan Reitman) had absolutely no interest in revisiting the story to make a sequel, but were talked into it. That lack of enthusiasm shows. It’s just kind of half-baked.

    Ghostbusters II
    “Everything you are doing is bad. I want you to know this.”

    It’s really a testament to how likeable the actors and the main characters are that the movie works at all. The story is terrible, but it’s not as though the story for the first film was the reason for its success. There, as here, the movie lives and dies because of Messrs. Aykroyd, Murray & Ramis. But this time around, they are suffocated by the indifferent story.

    Ghostbusters II
    “You know, I have met some dumb blondes in my life, but you take the taco, pal! Only a Carpathian would come back to life now and choose New York! Tasty pick, bonehead!”

    The story picks up with the group disbanded after being sued for all of the damage they caused in the first film. That’s not a bad setup, and leads to some great stuff. I would strongly argue that most of the good moments in the picture occur before they ever get back into the suits. You’ve got Ray & Winston singing to “Ungrateful little yuppie larva”, Venkman hosting the world’s best bad psychic show and Egon taking away a child’s puppy. Dana and Peter have some good dialogue and the courtroom scene is great. Everything after that is just slime…

    Ghostbusters II
    “Well, there are so many holes in 1st Avenue, we really didn’t think anyone would notice.”

    Ahh, yes, the slime. The slime has feelings, it has emotions. The slime likes music and responds negatively to those grumpy New Yorkers. Are you serious with this? It’s a deal-killer. If you haven’t seen this in a while and are saying “C’mon, it was a good movie and really funny”, cue up the picture again. Watch the toaster dance to Fats Domino. Watch the Statue of Liberty inspire the citizens by blaring elevator music. See the bad guy defeated by the hardened city folk singing. Bobby Brown is in the movie, for God’s sake. The only way you remember the movie fondly is in fact by not truly remembering it. Not all of it…

    Ghostbusters II
    “Boys! Boys! You’re scaring the straights, okay?”

    Rick Moranis is brought back for no real reason at all, except due to my previously noted rule of minor characters being overused in sequels. Let’s go ahead and call it the Louis Tully rule, because this film is the best example of it. Both this character and the character of Slimer (who wasn’t really a character at all in the first movie) are here in large part because they were made into more “meaningful” roles in the Real Ghostbusters cartoon. Yes, Ghostbusters II was made primarily because of the success of a Saturday morning cartoon. Still confused about the goofy tone of the film?

    Ghostbusters II
    “Very good, Louis. Short, but pointless.”

    Poor Ernie Hudson. He barely gets any more screen time than he did in the first picture, and in that one he wasn’t even introduced until the second half.

    Ghostbusters II
    “Well, better late then never.”

    The Vigo the Carpathian bit works fairly well from a humor perspective; not quite as well as the big bad. Peter MacNicol is absolutely perfect with his Dr. Janosz Poha character. It’s over the top in all the right ways.

    Ghostbusters II
    Venkman: “Kinda makes you wonder, doesn’t it?” Winston: “Wonder what?” Venkman: “Whether she’s naked under that toga. She is French. You know that.”

    I retain mostly positive memories of Ghostbusters II. It’s got more than enough funny material to compensate for the lousy effects and weak story. It works best if you completely forget all of the lousy feel-good moments. The ending is as sickly sweet as Murray’s previous film, Scrooged. Must have been something in the water with these late 1980’s movies.

    Ghostbusters II
    “You’re short, your bellybutton sticks out too far, and you’re a terrible burden on your poor mother.”

    Ghostbusters II was a box-office hit upon release, but the reviews were negative, and after Batman came out a week later, it looked sickly by comparison. No one was clamoring for another sequel. So it’s unfortunate in my opinion that our nostalgia for the original has rekindled plans for a Ghostbusters III. The project has even gained momentum after the death of Harold Ramis. Such an ill-advised idea. I hope to be proven wrong, but I’m not waiting up nights. I’d be far happier if it rotted on the vine and left this flawed but fun sequel as the last chapter for our boys…

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Pass

    The Representation Test Score: C (4 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    Representation Test

     

    Main Cast Bill Murray Dr. Peter Venkman, Dan Aykroyd Dr. Raymond Stantz, Sigourney Weaver Dana Barrett, Harold Ramis Dr. Egon Spengler
    Rating TV-PG
    Release Date Fri 16 Jun 1989 UTC
    Director Ivan Reitman
    Genres Action, Adventure, Comedy, Fantasy, Sci-Fi
    Plot The discovery of a massive river of ectoplasm and a resurgence of spectral activity allows the staff of Ghostbusters to revive the business.
    Poster Ghostbusters II
    Runtime 108
    Tagline Be ready to believe us.
    Writers Dan Aykroyd (characters) and, Harold Ramis (characters) …
    Year 1989
  • Them! (1954)

    Them! (1954)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    One of the first atomic age monster pictures and still one of the very best. It was released 60 years ago but actually still is scary…

    Them!

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of Them!:

    I grew up loving this movie. My father loves it and it was one of the first films he got on VHS (ask your parents, kids). It’s an absolute classic, one of the greatest creature features and still plays surprisingly well.

    Them!

    The main reason that the movie has aged so well is the same as that of other classic monster pictures; slow-building suspense trumps special effects wizardry. Although Them! employs rather simplistic techniques for the monsters, this is a good thing. There’s a menacing quality to the slow approach of the ants that makes them frightening. The filmmakers also wisely don’t overreach with the shots of the creatures, displaying their falseness, but instead judiciously focus on the terrifying sounds of the ants (tree frogs) and the dark underground settings to ratchet up the suspense. I’m serious – this film is far more suspenseful, thrilling and actually scary than you might expect considering it’s about giant killer ants.

    Them!

    It would have been brilliant to see this movie when it came out. These movies get spoofed like crazy, and deservedly so, but at the time they were not so credulous. This was the dawn of the atomic age. People truly did not know the full effects of these incredible weapons. It may not seem plausible today to assume that weapons testing in the desert could cause the type of mutations that these 1950’s monster pictures reveled in, but there was just enough doubt in peoples minds at the time that it’s easy to understand why the public ate these things up.

    Unbelievably, the movie was supposed to be in color and in 3D, but they had technical problems. So there are entire shots that are clearly meant to play up the 3D effect. I can’t imagine this film in color – it would have severely cheapened it. The atmosphere evoked by the dark, black & white scenes, particularly in the desert is magical and adds so much atmosphere that you excuse any eye-rolling dialogue.

    (For the best movie about this time, check out Joe Dante’s marvelous 1993 film Matinee, a comedy picture set during the Cuban Missile Crisis wherein John Goodman plays the director of these atomic age creature movies. Brilliant.)

    Them!

    For all of the times you’ve heard someone go on and on about how great Jaws is because they keep up the suspense and don’t reveal the beast until well into the picture, have you ever wondered where Spielberg learned that technique? Them! is the original – one of the all time great monster pictures.

    Fun fact: Look for a young Leonard Nimoy as a soldier reading out some wire copy.

    Fun fact #2: Has a number of Wilhelm screams from back before it was an inside joke.

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Fail

    The Representation Test Score: D (2 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    Representation Test

    [schema type=”movie” name=”Them!” description=”The earliest atomic tests in New Mexico cause common ants to mutate into giant man-eating monsters that threaten civilization.” director=”Gordon Douglas” actor_1=”James Whitmore” ]

    Main Cast James Whitmore Police Sgt. Ben Peterson, Edmund Gwenn Dr. Harold Medford, Joan Weldon Dr. Patricia ‘Pat’ Medford, James Arness Robert Graham
    Rating Approved
    Release Date Sat 19 Jun 1954 UTC
    Director Gordon Douglas
    Genres Horror, Sci-Fi
    Plot The earliest atomic tests in New Mexico cause common ants to mutate into giant man-eating monsters that threaten civilization.
    Poster Them!
    Runtime 94
    Tagline The Amazing New Warner Bros. Sensation!
    Writers Ted Sherdeman (screenplay), Russell S. Hughes (as Russell Hughes) (adaptation)
    Year 1954