Category: Reviews

  • Dolphin Tale 2 (2014)

    Dolphin Tale 2 (2014)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    Like the 1st, only less so. If you liked the first film, you’ll enjoy this as well, but it’s a less significant picture in most respects…

    Dolphin Tale 2

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of Dolphin Tale 2:

    This review is going to feel like déjà vu all over again, which is fitting, since so does the film.

    The first Dolphin Tale was a huge financial and (mostly) critical success, but a sequel wouldn’t seem to make any sense were it not for a most unlikely – but true – series of events. As in the case of the original picture, the dramatized recreations of the true story were more interesting than the fictionalized extra story material. Unlike in the first film, the extra story material is weak and undeserving of so much screen time.

    Dolphin Tale 2

    It’s really remarkable that they could make a sequel to a true story, following it up with another true story, and the tale (heh heh) is almost too perfect to believe. At a wrap party for the first film, volunteers and staff from the Clearwater Marine Aquarium were called away from the event to care for a young female bottlenose dolphin who had been rescued. This dolphin would be named Hope and is the film’s raison d’être.

    The film opens with the rescue of a bottlenose dolphin in a sequence narrated by Sawyer (Nathan Gamble), the protagonist of the first picture. It’s been three years and he’s now thriving as an essential staff member at the aquarium. Business has been booming at the facility, which has now expanded and is more of a tourist attraction, which raises the pressures on the team when something goes wrong – which of course it does.

    Dolphin Tale 2

    Because part of my mission is to look at these films from a family-friendly perspective, I must tell you that the first act contains the heartbreaking death of Panama, the bottlenose tankmate of Winter. (This isn’t a spoiler – it’s the story catalyst.) It’s done very respectfully but it’s still quite upsetting, so prep your young ones.

    With the death of Panama, Winter is now alone in the tank – a regulatory violation – and has become depressed. The Clearwater team will need hope if they are going to be able to keep Winter from being sent to another aquarium.

    Dolphin Tale 2

    Story-wise, though, so far, so good. But it’s the whole other story that is tedious. In the first picture screenwriters Karen Janszen & Noam Dromi crafted an interesting allegorical story about humans coping with loss and change much like Winter. Director Charles Martin Smith handled writing duties for this film and is not as successful. It’s basically a coming of age / “should I stay or should I go” story mixed in with a “keep the aquarium going” storyline that’s a retread of the first film. It is appropriately shorter than the first film, but considering how much story there isn’t, it could have been shorter still.

    Dolphin Tale 2

    Nearly all of the primary characters have their roles severely reduced, with the exception of Sawyer. Morgan Freeman, Ashley Judd & Kris Kristofferson probably could have filmed all of their scenes in an afternoon. I’m not even sure they bothered to check in with the costume department – I think they just walked on to the set in their street clothes. Freeman in particular seems operating on autopilot – he could have (and may have) done this in his sleep.

    Dolphin Tale 2

    One character that doesn’t lose any screen time is Rufus the pelican, following the Louis Tully rule of sequels. That’s fine – he’s funny and most of his scenes are with new character Mavis, a rescued sea turtle – and I love sea turtles!

    Dolphin Tale 2

    So am I saying to give this film a miss? Not at all. It’s still sweet and cute and fun and the animals are always spellbinding. It’s just the human stuff is a little more pedestrian in this film and I don’t think it’s quite as inspirational of a story. But it is an entertaining film and I could watch these dolphins for hours. The child audience in the theater loved it, including the one I brought, and the rest of us seemed to find it an enjoyable and solid enough movie.

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Pass

    The Representation Test Score: B (10 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    Dolphin Tale 2 Representation Test

    [schema type=”movie” url=”http://www.dolphintale2.com/” name=”Dolphin Tale 2″ description=”It has been several years since young Sawyer Nelson (Gamble) and the dedicated team at the Clearwater Marine Hospital, headed by Dr. Clay Haskett (Connick, Jr.), rescued Winter. With the help of Dr. Cameron McCarthy (Freeman), who developed a unique prosthetic tail for the injured dolphin, they were able to save her life. Yet their fight is not over. Winter’s surrogate mother, the very elderly dolphin Panama, has passed away, leaving Winter without the only poolmate she has ever known. However, the loss of Panama may have even greater repercussions for Winter, who, according to USDA regulations, cannot be housed alone, as dolphins’ social behavior requires them to be paired with other dolphins. Time is running out to find a companion for her before the team at Clearwater loses their beloved Winter to another aquarium.” director=”Charles Martin Smith” actor_1=”Harry Connick Jr.” actor_2=”Morgan Freeman” actor_3=”Ashley Judd” actor_4=”Nathan Gamble” actor_5=”Cozi Zuehlsdorff” actor_6=”Bethany Hamilton” ]

    Main Cast Morgan Freeman Dr. Cameron McCarthy, Ashley Judd Lorraine Nelson, Nathan Gamble Sawyer Nelson, Cozi Zuehlsdorff Hazel Haskett
    Rating PG
    Release Date Fri 12 Sep 2014 UTC
    Director Charles Martin Smith
    Genres Drama, Family
    Plot The team of people who saved Winter’s life reassemble in the wake of her surrogate mother’s passing in order to find her a companion so she can remain at the Clearwater Marine Hospital.
    Poster Dolphin Tale 2
    Runtime 107
    Tagline WINTER’s amazing true story… now has HOPE.
    Writers Charles Martin Smith (written by), Karen Janszen (characters) …
    Year 2014
  • Amadeus (1984)

    Amadeus (1984)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    Peter Shaffer brilliantly adapts his own play, Director Miloš Forman delivers a masterpiece. 30 years later still one of the best ever made.

    Amadeus

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of Amadeus:

    In 1984, after a summer of blockbusters and in the middle of an age obsessed with synthesizers, video games, computers, electronics and everything “new”, producer Saul Zaentz presented a two and a half hour movie about classical music composers that had been dead for almost two hundred years. That takes some nerve…

    It helps that the film in question would be based on a successful play and was being written for the screen by the playwright, Peter Shaffer. Amadeus would also be directed by Miloš Forman, an accomplished and challenging filmmaker both in his native country (the former Czechoslovakia) and throughout the world. It was still a big risk, however.

    Amadeus

    Zaentz’s gamble paid off big, bringing in well over twice its budget and winning 8 Oscars including Best Picture. More importantly it is a tremendous movie that plays exactly as well as it did 30 years ago today.

    The quality of the filmmakers is on display almost immediately, as the story opens with an aged Antonio Salieri (F. Murray Abraham in his greatest role) shouting his confession that he killed Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, begging for forgiveness as he cuts open his throat. What a grabber! You can practically hear those who were dragged to the movie theater whispering admiringly to their spouses, “Whoa! I thought this was going to be boring music and people in wigs?”

    Amadeus

    The premise of the play and film is at once wonderful writing and complete nonsense. Salieri did not kill Mozart, he did not suggest that he killed Mozart, no serious people think that he killed Mozart. According to scholars of the men, the two may have had some rivalry between them, but nothing suggests the level of disrespect or hatred shown here. They were both competing for work and the favor of Emperor Joseph II, but there is plenty of correspondence signifying that they were respectful colleagues. It is true that Mozart complained in his lifetime that Salieri was more at favor and trying to obstruct his career, but this seems to be mostly based on Mozart’s complaints against the Italians in general, and there are other letters from Mozart implying a friendship.

    What I didn’t realize before doing research for this review is that Shaffer’s play is actually based on a tragedy called Mozart and Salieri by Alexander Pushkin that was staged only six years after Salieri’s death. Rimsky-Korsakov would adapt it into an opera at the turn of the century. It was here that the apocryphal tale that Salieri, filled with jealousy at the musical superiority of an “idle” man, poisoned Mozart were first aired. So there were rumors, but none that were taken seriously. What we really have here is a clever writer taking a fascinating bit of history and fictionalizing it dramatically to make for an entertaining tale about genius and jealousy.

    Amadeus

    The story is set in 1823, when Salieri, recovering in an insane asylum from his suicide attempt, narrates his tale to a priest who has come for his confession. The film plays out over a number of years through flashbacks, but mainly focuses on the ten year period from 1781-91 in which Salieri and Mozart were colleagues in Vienna.

    The story is captivating, with whip-smart dialogue and a brilliant narrative that, along with Forman’s expert direction, leads to an engrossing picture whose pace is more engaging than a 153-minute movie has any right to be. The tale ebbs and flows and there’s a diversity of scenes and emotions that make the film always seem fresh and never long.

    Amadeus

    The acting, of course, is wonderful. Abraham delivers a best in show performance as Salieri, with a range of emotion and subtlety that is a perfect match with the complex score. Tom Hulce is charismatic and mesmerizing as Mozart, greatly humanizing such a legendary figure. Both were nominated for Best Actor and while Abraham justly was awarded the statue, I feel Hulce was robbed by not being classified as Supporting Actor.

    Amadeus

    Elizabeth Berridge put in a great performance as Mozart’s wife Constanze, though a lot of her work was left on the cutting room floor. (Restored with the 2002 Director’s Cut.) All of the supporting players are excellent, with Jeffrey Jones’ humorous turn as Emperor Joseph II standing out. Also exceptional is Simon Callow, who played Mozart in the original London production, as Emanuel Schikaneder, Mozart’s friend and author of the libretto for The Magic Flute.

    It’s a quality production in all respects. The score is predictably brilliant, the costumes, makeup and art direction are award-winning and it’s really just a gorgeous picture. Forman invited choreography legend Twyla Tharp to work her magic on the picture. They had previously collaborated on Hair & Ragtime.

    Amadeus

    Amadeus is a captivating story and an amazing film. Enjoy it often…

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Fail

    The Representation Test Score: C (5 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    Amadeus Representation Test[schema type=”movie” name=”Amadeus” description=”The incredible story of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, told by his peer and secret rival Antonio Salieri – now confined to an insane asylum.” director=”Milos Forman” actor_1=”F. Murray Abraham” actor_2=”Tom Hulce” actor_3=”Elizabeth Berridge”]

    Main Cast F. Murray Abraham Antonio Salieri, Tom Hulce Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, Elizabeth Berridge Constanze Mozart, Roy Dotrice Leopold Mozart
    Rating PG
    Release Date Wed 19 Sep 1984 UTC
    Director Milos Forman
    Genres Biography, Drama, Music
    Plot The incredible story of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, told by his peer and secret rival Antonio Salieri – now confined to an insane asylum.
    Poster Amadeus
    Runtime 160
    Tagline Amadeus. The man. The music. The magic. The madness. The murder. The mystery. The motion picture.
    Writers Peter Shaffer (original stage play), Peter Shaffer (original screenplay)
    Year 1984
  • Goldfinger (1964)

    Goldfinger (1964)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    Probably the best, certainly the most iconic James Bond film. Quintessential: if you only could screen one 007 film, this would be the one.

    Goldfinger

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of Goldfinger:

    Today is the 50th anniversary of the release of the third James Bond film, Goldfinger. This one kind of snuck up on me; I had this on my editorial calendar for December 22nd. (Yes, I do plan these things.) That date wasn’t wrong exactly – that was the date of the US premiere – but the London premiere was September 17, 1964 (debuted to the UK public the next day – full release in USA January 9, 1965). I need an assistant researcher…

    Goldfinger

    So this is possibly going to be much shorter than I intended. I plan to revisit the entire series eventually – I am a huge Bond fan. For now I’ll keep it pretty simple – Goldfinger is the best James Bond film.

    Goldfinger

    In retrospect, it’s very easy to understand why Goldfinger was a smash hit, critically and commercially.

    • After two pictures, producers Harry Saltzman & Albert R. Broccoli and star Sean Connery knew exactly what they were doing. Goldfinger is the archetypical well-oiled machine.
    • Screenwriter Richard Maibaum was also operating in familiar territory with two Bond films under his belt. He would write or co-write 13 of the first 16 Bond films – most of them adapted from Ian Fleming’s novels.

    Goldfinger

    • Though the third film in the series, it is based on the seventh 007 novel, and Fleming is in good form by that point. (It was the last novel he wrote before the Thunderball debacle and in some ways he never really recovered from that. He passed away a few months before the film release of Goldfinger.)
    • It’s a fairly linear story. The bad guy is immediately identified – he even appears in the pre-credits scene. Other than his henchman Oddjob, he doesn’t have a massive organization behind him or secret underground lair. His plan is involved but not overly elaborate.

    Goldfinger

    • Production Designer Ken Adam, who was so important on Dr. No but absent for From Russia With Love, is back to great effect. The same is true of stunt coordinator Bob Simmons, another unsung hero of the series.
    • It doesn’t hang around for no reason – it’s only 110 minutes and those are all used efficiently. Only Dr. No & Quantum of Solace are so short.
    • The image of the deceased Jill Masterson (Shirley Eaton) completely covered in gold paint is one of the most striking images the series has ever produced.

    Goldfinger

    • It has possibly the most famous title song in Bond history, and it’s up there in screen history.
    • The car. The Aston Martin DB5. So classic.

    Goldfinger

    • The other car. First film appearance of a Ford Mustang.
    • The girl. Honor Blackman as Pussy Galore (really?) was 39 at the time, making her the oldest Bond girl ever. Which is pretty appalling for a lot of reasons, chief among them being that she projects such credibility and capability that you wonder why they never again cast an older (?) woman.

    Goldfinger

    • The villain. Auric Goldfinger is sort of interesting in that he doesn’t really get his hands dirty. Even Dr. No put up a fight in the end, and he was a stick.

    Goldfinger

    • First time putting 007 in the United States, even if Connery never set foot on the continent.
    • Q (Desmond Llewelyn) makes his second appearance in this film, but it’s the first time we go to Q Branch’s workshop and see all of the toys.

    Goldfinger

    Of course, it’s not all sunshine and lollipops, but most of the issues with the film are more “what could have been” thoughts:

    • Q Branch: while this is fun, knowing that this stuff would soon start being the tail wagging the dog makes it a little less enjoyable. This was pretty much the end of James Bond actually spying; he was strictly an action hero after this film.
    • Gert Fröbe has a definite presence on screen, even if all of his dialogue is dubbed, but I’ll never really be comfortable with an admitted former Nazi Party member actually gassing people, even if they are gangsters. At least there’s Harold Sakata’s Oddjob to keep things light. I still think it would have been interesting if they got their first choice, Orson Welles…

    Goldfinger

    • At the end the credits state “James Bond will return in On Her Majesty’s Secret Service“. But he didn’t. They couldn’t get it happening and went with the lawsuit riddled Thunderball. I know it was an even bigger film than Goldfinger and the height of Bond mania, but I have very mixed feelings about the picture, considering it to be a very flawed film despite containing some series highlights. Even after that they still didn’t do OHMSS, but they went with You Only Live Twice, one of the weakest films of the entire series. On Her Majesty’s Secret Service is one of the best Bond films and one of my personal favorites, and while I think George Lazenby did a wonderful job, I would have loved to see Connery’s take on it.

    Goldfinger

    • In the book, Pussy Galore is gay – this may have allowed me to give the picture at least one point on the Representation Test had it not been changed for the film…
    • Finally, “skin suffocation”? Great plot point, but it’s total nonsense…

    Goldfinger

    Goldfinger is one of those landmark films that you wish you could see with fresh eyes. It’s nearly perfect and there’s a reason it tops most peoples lists. Picking your favorite Bond is like picking your favorite Beatles album – there’s no wrong answer. But picking the best? Got to go with Goldfinger.

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Fail

    The Representation Test Score: F (0 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    Goldfinger Representation Test

    [schema type=”movie” url=”http://www.007.com/” name=”Goldfinger” description=”Investigating a gold magnate’s smuggling, James Bond uncovers a plot to contaminate the Fort Knox gold reserve.” director=”Guy Hamilton” actor_1=”Sean Connery” ]

    Main Cast Sean Connery James Bond, Gert Fröbe (as Gert Frobe) Goldfinger/Auric Goldfinger, Honor Blackman Pussy Galore, Shirley Eaton Jill Masterson
    Rating TV-PG
    Release Date Sat 09 Jan 1965 UTC
    Director Guy Hamilton
    Genres Action, Adventure, Thriller
    Plot Investigating a gold magnate’s smuggling, James Bond uncovers a plot to contaminate the Fort Knox gold reserve.
    Poster Goldfinger
    Runtime 110
    Tagline Miss Honey and Miss Galore Have James Bond Back For More!
    Writers Richard Maibaum (screenplay) &, Paul Dehn (screenplay)
    Year 1964
  • Dolphin Tale (2011)

    Dolphin Tale (2011)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    Exactly what it looks like: cute, family-friendly, inspirational, endearing & completely devoid of any sharp edges. Not a bad thing at all.

    Dolphin Tale

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of Dolphin Tale:

    What a cute movie. You know, sometimes a thing just is what it is – and that’s alright. This movie turned out to be every bit the sweet family fare that it teased. And there is nothing at all wrong with that.

    Dolphin Tale

    You can sort of tell just by the casting what kind of movie it’s going to be. Some of these actors just broadcast this vibe that there isn’t going to be any heavy lifting involved with what you’re about to see. The folksy compassion of Kris Kristofferson, the worldly (& folksy) wisdom of Morgan Freeman, the folksy wholesomeness of Ashley Judd, the jazzy wholesomeness of Harry Connick Jr. – it’s like the cast of a Lifetime special with more star power. But that’s alright; this isn’t the story for acting fireworks.

    Dolphin Tale

    And it is a great story. Based simultaneously tightly AND loosely on a real story. It’s sort of an interesting mix. The details about Winter are extremely accurate, while everything else is extremely fictional.

    Dolphin Tale

    The story of Winter, a dolphin stranded on a beach in Florida after being injured in a crab net, is an amazing one. This is a wonderful animal who was rescued by some brave and inventive people and it’s an inspirational story that you’d have to be made of stone not to warm to. The film features Winter in her home location at the Clearwater Marine Aquarium, and in the closing credits of the picture we get to see footage of the events just dramatized. Now, I’m tempted to say that it’s such a good story and the actual recordings are so captivating that a feature film is really unnecessary – that they should have just stuck with a documentary (of which there is one – Winter, the Dolphin That Can – http://www.seewinter.com/winter-hope/real-life-story).

    Dolphin Tale

    But that would be selling short the job that screenwriters Karen Janszen & Noam Dromi have done in creating a great dramatization that honors the inspirational effect Winter has had on many people. The story of overcoming physical trauma and the adversity it creates is meaningful on so many levels, and the screenwriters have used this as the basis for the film story, which draws parallels with our wounded soldiers. The story is more than a little bit melodramatic and could probably have used a haircut, but it is engaging and well-written.

    Dolphin Tale

    The picture is very well made – craftsman-like, but not showy. I’m not in love with the over-clean look of the film, but it suits the movie. DP Karl Walter Lindenlaub had to work with the ill-advised decision to shoot in native 3D – this picture never needed to be in 3D – and perhaps that led to the antiseptic image. More than anything, though, everything and everyone are just too tidy.

    Dolphin Tale

    Dolphin Tale is a heartwarming picture that can truly be inspirational if you watch it with the right audience and right mind frame. If not, it’s earnestness may seem saccharine. But it is a delight to watch with children and highly recommended.

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Pass

    The Representation Test Score: A (11 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    Dolphin Tale Representation Test

    [schema type=”movie” url=”http://dolphintalemovie.warnerbros.com/dvd/index.html” name=”Dolphin Tale” description=””Dolphin Tale” is inspired by the amazing true story of a brave dolphin and the compassionate strangers who banded together to save her life. Swimming free, a young dolphin is caught in a crab trap, severely damaging her tail. She is rescued and transported to the Clearwater Marine Hospital, where she is named Winter. But her fight for survival has just begun. Without a tail, Winter’s prognosis is dire “Dolphin Tale,” today serves as a symbol of courage, perseverance and hope to millions of people-both able and disabled-who have been touched by her remarkable story of recovery and rehabilitation.” director=”Charles Martin Smith” actor_1=”Morgan Freeman” actor_2=”Ashley Judd” actor_3=”Harry Connick Jr.” actor_4=”Nathan Gamble” actor_5=”Cozi Zuehlsdorff” ]

    Main Cast Morgan Freeman Dr. Cameron McCarthy, Ashley Judd Lorraine Nelson, Harry Connick Jr. Dr. Clay Haskett, Nathan Gamble Sawyer Nelson
    Rating PG
    Release Date Fri 23 Sep 2011 UTC
    Director Charles Martin Smith
    Genres Drama, Family
    Plot A story centered on the friendship between a boy and a dolphin whose tail was lost in a crab trap.
    Poster Dolphin Tale
    Runtime 113
    Tagline Inspired by the amazing true story of Winter
    Writers Karen Janszen (written by) and, Noam Dromi (written by)
    Year 2011
  • Redshirts (2012)

    Redshirts (2012)

    Red Shirts
    Red Shirts by John Scalzi

    My rating: 4 of 5 stars

    You don’t need to be a Trekkie to be familiar with the “redshirt” phenomenon. During the three-year run of the original Star Trek tv series in the 1960’s, fans noticed a certain trend of crew members being briefly introduced and rapidly killed in bizarre ways whenever landing on some new planet. Whenever the anonymous characters beamed down with one or more of the main characters, you could practically hear the last grains of sand passing through their hourglasses. The writers seemed to have a passion for wiping out the crew around Kirk, Spock & Bones at a dramatic rate just to illustrate how perilous the missions were. In all, fans calculated that some 75% of the characters killed on the show were wearing red shirts, which is to say nothing of the other nameless crew members whose shirt color didn’t prevent them from suffering the same fate.

    John Scalzi’s Hugo Award winning novel Redshirts sends up this phenomenon in an amusing fashion, following a fresh new recruit, Ensign Andrew Dahl, who has just arrived on the flagship Enterp-sorry, Intrepid. A number of other new faces have been assigned to the Intrepid, which needs all the bodies it can get, since the ship keeps losing people on every away mission the crew undertake. Along with his fellow recruits, Dahl begins to recognize that anyone selected to participate in an away mission had better not start any long books. In fact, any team members on a mission with certain Senior Officers are dead crewmen walking, and together the recruits begin to look for a way to stop this trend. After all, each of them has a backstory, but only barely, leading them to wonder if they are even the protagonist in their own story, or merely extras…

    It’s a clever story, helped markedly by being a quick, well-paced read. The novel obviously works best if you are an avid Star Trek fan, but it isn’t reliant on the fact. I know the films and the original series pretty well, but am by no means a big Trek fan. A decent familiarity with sci-fi in general is adequate for most of the jokes here. I caught some great little tips of the hat and missed probably many more – it doesn’t matter – the story works mainly because it is not a spoof, but a very solid story that is funny on its own merits.

    The dialogue is top shelf, which I have come to expect from Scalzi and the action is well written. The whole thing is breezily read and it all too easy to visualize as a living, breathing show. (I understand plans for a series are afoot.)

    The book is advertised as “a novel with three codas” and these codas are really quite interesting. I have no intention of spoiling the story by explaining the inclusion of this “extra” material, but I they are very welcome additions and help to tie up the whole story.

    Highly recommended.

    [schema type=”book” url=”http://whatever.scalzi.com/” name=”Redshirts” description=”Ensign Andrew Dahl has just been assigned to the Universal Union Capital Ship Intrepid, flagship of the Universal Union since the year 2456. It’s a prestige posting, and Andrew is thrilled all the more to be assigned to the ship’s Xenobiology laboratory. Life couldn’t be better…until Andrew begins to pick up on the fact that (1) every Away Mission involves some kind of lethal confrontation with alien forces, (2) the ship’s captain, its chief science officer, and the handsome Lieutenant Kerensky always survive these confrontations, and (3) at least one low-ranked crew member is, sadly, always killed. Not surprisingly, a great deal of energy below decks is expendedon avoiding, at all costs, being assigned to an Away Mission. Then Andrew stumbles on information that completely transforms his and his colleagues’ understanding of what the starship Intrepid really is…and offers them a crazy, high-risk chance to save their own lives. Redshirts is the winner of the 2013 Hugo Award for Best Novel.” author=”John Scalzi” publisher=”Tor Books” pubdate=”2012-01-01″ isbn=”0765316994″ ebook=”yes” paperback=”yes” hardcover=”yes” ]