Category: Reviews

  • The Wind Rises “Kaze tachinu” (2013)

    The Wind Rises “Kaze tachinu” (2013)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    The first of a new series, Miyazaki March Mondays. I haven’t seen all of his works, but I’m still going to say this is his best achievement.

    宮崎月月曜日、新シリーズの最初の。私は彼の作品のすべてを見ていないが、私はまだ、これは彼の最高の成果であると言うつもりです。

    The Wind Rises

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of The Wind Rises:

    Hayao Miyazaki has announced his retirement. The Wind Rises reportedly will be his last film. (Or is it? There are now reports he is or has rescinded his retirement. Evidently this is something he has done a number of times.) Apparently he was saving the best for last; we should all be so fortunate to go out on top.

    The Wind Rises

    Now, I’m late to the Miyazaki party; I’ve only seen a few of his films so far, which is partly why I’m going to dedicate Mondays in the month of March to reviewing some of his classics. (The other reason is that my daughter is an enormous fan.) So, since I’ve only seen a couple of his movies, is it really fair to declare The Wind Rises his best? Yes. Yes it is. Because The Wind Rises is possibly the greatest hand-animated film ever made. I’m not really comparing it with his other films; I’m comparing it (favorably) to ever other animated film of all time.

    The Wind Rises

    This was the first of his films I’ve seen on the big screen, and that possibly leads me to have a greater impression of the grandeur and vastness of his scenes than I would at home. But I don’t think so. The sweeping vistas and clarity of screen composition is something I’ve been drawn to in each of his films.

    The Wind Rises

    In fact, the striking visuals of his movies may distract from his other talents as a filmmaker. What it most characteristic of Miyazaki films in my mind is not the visual style, it’s the narrative style. The pacing is truly unique. These stories breathe and shift; they are allowed time to develop. I often speak of pacing in my reviews; I consider pacing to be one of the most important elements in the success or failure of a film. And the unhurried narrative in Miyazaki’s films, and The Wind Rises in particular, provides a welcome respite from the breakneck speed of most films (especially animated ones). That’s not to say that they can’t become a bit slow, and the less engaging stories can drag on, but when you’ve got a good tale, it’s refreshing to be afforded the time and opportunity to let it find its own rhythm.

    The Wind Rises

    Miyazaki seems to have a sense of wonder about the world that leads to this style of filmmaking. In The Wind Rises, this view is personified in the main character, Jiro Horikoshi, whose childish fascination with flight seems undimmed throughout years of often fruitless striving for aeronautic success. Through setbacks and struggle, Jiro never seems to lose this sense of wonder or shed his genial outlook.

    The Wind Rises

    Horikoshi makes for a wonderful protagonist because of his talents but especially because of his single-minded love of flight. He is a brilliantly human character, as well; full of flaws that give the story depth. Joseph Gordon-Levitt is a natural for the part; his voice is quite fitting. In fact, none of the celebrity voices really distract, although I still greatly prefer to watch a film in the language in which it was filmed.

    The Wind Rises

    For my money, though, the success of this film is largely attributable to the story. I have long maintained that many artists do their best work when they work within the constraints of someone else’s input; film adaptations are our culture’s variations on a theme. There is something about having source material to inform the work that beautifully focuses gifted filmmakers.

    The Wind Rises

    The Wind Rises is a perfect example. This is the first time (to my knowledge) that Miyazaki has based his work on a real person. Jiro Horikoshi’s life was first chronicled in Tatsuo Hori’s short novel “The Wind Has Risen”, written in 1936–1937, then turned into a manga by Miyazaki in 2009. While the story of Horikoshi’s personal life appears to be largely fictionalized, his legacy as an engineer follows the historical record, and Miyazaki wisely takes as his cue a quote from Jiro Horikoshi: “All I wanted to do was to make something beautiful.”

    The Wind Rises

    This last point is hugely important, as audiences, not exclusively but certainly American audiences, may have trouble with a major concept here: Horikoshi’s work directly led to the planes that bombed Pearl Harbor. It’s not a minor consideration, and Miyazaki doesn’t treat it as one. The entire film is predicated on the idea that these men of science struggle with the reality of their creations. The engineers are all too aware of the military ends to which their inventions will be used; it is a constant theme that haunts Horikoshi and his colleagues. The subject is treated with respect and never sugarcoats reality.

    The Wind Rises

    The Wind Rises is an absolute triumph; it is among the greatest animated films ever made. Please take the opportunity to see it in theaters if you can.

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Pass

    The Representation Test Score: B (10 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    Representation Test

    Main Cast Joseph Gordon-Levitt Jirô Horikoshi (voice: English version), John Krasinski Honjô (voice: English version), Emily Blunt Nahoko Satomi (voice: English version), Martin Short Kurokawa (voice: English version)
    Rating PG-13
    Release Date Sat 20 Jul 2013 UTC
    Director Hayao Miyazaki
    Genres Animation, Biography, Drama, History, Romance, War
    Plot A look at the life of Jiro Horikoshi, the man who designed Japanese fighter planes during World War II.
    Poster The Wind Rises
    Runtime 126
    Tagline Ikineba. (We must live.)
    Writers Hayao Miyazaki (comic), Hayao Miyazaki (screenplay)
    Year 2013
  • The Wolverine (2013)

    The Wolverine (2013)

    #140RVW

    6th time the charm? Despite the total lack of a reason for yet another movie, this is well made, using the Japanese location to good effect.

    The Wolverine

    What’s more:

    Since this is the 6th X-Men movie, 5 of them with Wolverine and two of those with him as the main character (and 3 more with him essentially the main character), there’s not really not much more to say at this point. The character has been over-covered.

    The Wolverine

    But still, this is a good movie – kind of a do-over after X-Men Origins. Going back to a great Claremont/Miller storyline from the 80’s, the story is updated to fall chronologically after The Last Stand.

    The Wolverine

    Logan is moping around and seeing Jean Grey everywhere he goes, when he is blissfully brought to Japan for a more explicit ronin parallel. More probably could have been done with the concept, but it works pretty well and the setting is excellent.

    The Wolverine

    The movie is leagues better than the 1st Wolverine film, though that is faint praise, but there’s definite weariness to the whole affair. Not on the part of the filmmakers – it’s a very well-done project. It’s the rest of us who are weary of the character. I can understand why they wanted to make this  – better bridging The Last Stand and Days of Future Past later this year. Just sort of wish they could of stuck with the X-Men movies and not bothered with these spin-offs.

    The Wolverine

    Maybe the best thing in the movie is the number of strong females. Everyone involved should take a bow for making a film with multiple female characters that aren’t just arm candy, but fully realized individuals with their own storylines. Except for Viper – she’s just stupid.  ..

    The Wolverine

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Pass

    The Representation Test Score: C (5 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    Representation Test

    Main Cast Hugh Jackman Logan, Will Yun Lee Harada, Tao Okamoto Mariko, Rila Fukushima Yukio
    Rating PG-13
    Release Date Fri 26 Jul 2013 UTC
    Director James Mangold
    Genres Action, Adventure, Fantasy, Sci-Fi
    Plot When Wolverine is summoned to Japan by an old acquaintance, he is embroiled in a conflict that forces him to confront his own demons.
    Poster The Wolverine
    Runtime 126
    Tagline When he’s most vulnerable, he’s most dangerous.
    Writers Mark Bomback (screenplay) and, Scott Frank (screenplay)
    Year 2013
  • Adaptation. (2002)

    Adaptation. (2002)

    #140RVW

    Spike Jonze & Charlie Kaufman’s create a trippy metafilm; just being made could have been this movie’s greatest achievement; so much more…

    Adaptation.

    What’s more:

    I have no idea how this got greenlit, but I’m grateful. The semi-autobiographical story of screenwriter Charlie Kaufman struggling (and mostly failing) to adapt real-life author Susan Orlean’s 1988 non-fiction book “The Orchid Thief” raises so many questions:

    • Why did filmmakers think this book would make a good movie in the first place?
    • How did Kaufman manage to ever work in town again after turning in a screenplay that is really just an account of him struggling to adapt the book?
    • Why did Susan Orlean, John Laroche & Robert McKee agree to their portrayals in this?

    Adaptation.

    Well, whatever the reasons, I’m just happy that it all came together, because Adaptation is a wonderful movie. Perhaps it is more of an experiment than a true movie, but it is very enjoyable.

    Except for the ending; the ending sucked. Truly. If Robert McKee is right and “The last act makes a film.”, then this wasn’t any good. So I think that quote is a touch over-simple. The third act didn’t ruin Adaptation, although it’s startling left turn in tone made a close job of doing so.

    Adaptation.

    Further questions for discussion:
    • While everyone agrees Chris Carter is a great actor, is this the role he should have gotten an Oscar for? (He did.)

    Adaptation.

    • I was probably half way through the movie before I realized that Donald Kaufman (Charlie’s fictitious twin brother) was actually a character in the movie and not a figment of Charlie’s imagination. I was getting really confused. I’m not sure, but I don’t think they even refer to him by name for quite a bit. So my question: if this was not Nic Cage doubling as a second character, but rather just some roommate played by another actor, would that make this better or worse?

    Adaptation.

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Pass, barely

    The Representation Test Score: B (7 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    Representation Test

    Main Cast Nicolas Cage Charlie Kaufman/Donald Kaufman, Meryl Streep Susan Orlean, Chris Cooper John Laroche, Tilda Swinton Valerie Thomas
    Rating R
    Release Date Fri 10 Jan 2003 UTC
    Director Spike Jonze
    Genres Comedy, Crime, Drama
    Plot A love-lorn script writer grows increasingly desperate in his quest to adapt the book ‘The Orchid Thief’.
    Poster Adaptation.
    Runtime 114
    Tagline From the creator of Being John Malkovich, comes the story about the creator of Being John Malkovich.
    Writers Susan Orlean (book), Charlie Kaufman (screenplay) …
    Year 2002
  • Total Recall (1990)

    Total Recall (1990)

    #140RVW

    Did you know that they planned to make a sequel to this movie based on the story Minority Report? Can you imagine how awful that would be?

    Total Recall (1990)

    What’s more:

    Ok, let’s get this out of the way; I know you remember this being great – it isn’t. That’s not to say that it’s bad – it’s not; well, maybe it is pretty bad. But in any event it isn’t great, and I suspect it’s better in your memory than in reality.

    Total Recall (1990)
    Arnold Schwarzenegger in The Running Man. No wait, this is Total Recall, isn’t it? He has the same job, though?

    The story is great, of course. Based on legendary science fiction author Philip K. Dick’s short story, “We Can Remember It For You Wholesale”, the bones for a very good sci-fi film are there. It’s all there for you in the short story – just pick it up and don’t screw it up. Of course, it is a short story, so you’ll need to do some real work to make a feature out of it. Fortunately, you’re in good hands with Dan O’Bannon and Ron Shusett, writers of a little picture called “Alien”. These guys are old farm hands, and they know how to write science fiction for the screen. (Their original screen story was also worked on by Jon Povill & Gary Goldman.)

    Total Recall (1990)
    “This is a Verhoeven movie; there will be boobies!”

    Dick’s story accounts for the central premise and essentially the first 15 minutes of the movie. SPOILER: The main character never gets out of the chair in the book. (Although it’s possible that he never leaves the chair in the film, either; an outcome not left in as much doubt as it should be.)

    Total Recall (1990)
    “Okay. That means that…our whole solar system…could be, like…one tiny atom in the fingernail of some other giant being. This is too much!”

    As soon as Ahnold storms out of Rekall, we’re off book. What follows is a very good sci-fi head trip in which we are forced to wonder what is reality and similar heavy themes. That’s the story, not the execution. The execution is a truly ugly, poorly acted, overly violent, badly designed mess. Don’t confuse the two – it’s perfectly acceptable to think this was a great idea for movie and a terrible movie. They aren’t mutually exclusive.

    Total Recall (1990)
    “You have just enjoyed a very inferior film. Boy, that’s a weird fortune. Arnold, what did you get?”

    To over simplify, the only good decision the producers made was to make the movie in the first place. Everything after that was downhill; the selection of director, the casting, the production design, the effects studio – everything. (Of course, Ahnold was in the drivers seat for most of these decisions, having rescued the movie from development hell.)

    Total Recall (1990)
    “Warm it up, everything you’ve got. C’mon you apes, you wanna live forever?”

    Don’t reflexively argue because you thought it was great at the time – go rewatch it and tell me if it plays like you remember. Then watch the remake. Don’t misunderstand – it may have seemed great at the time when we hadn’t seen a lot of trippy mind-bending sci-fi. It may have even been great – or more accurately, the flaws may have been less important in the face of the unique story. But viewed objectively, it really is not a very good movie.

    Total Recall (1990)
    “Cool miniature set! So is there a big fight scene here? No?”
    Additional thoughts written while watching:
    • How seriously did they take the source material? They misspelled Philip K. Dick’s first name, if that’s any indication.
    • Re-watching this I get why Sharon Stone became a star; she’s engaging. Awful, but engaging…
    • They wanted Arnold to play Robocop but he was too large for the suit. They should have let him do that role and cast someone remotely believable as a spy for this…
    • JohnnyCab – make this possible now, please.
    • Ah, the 80’s, the only time Michael Ironside & Ronny Cox could be stars.
    • I know it’s 1990, but couldn’t they do better effects than this? ILM was doing amazing work at this same time. The producers were just being cheap. I know that the CG is groundbreaking; it looks crappy but it was a time of transition – I’m not judging that – it would be unfair. But the practical effects are another matter. The miniatures are pretty good but the green screens are unbelievable, and the sets and Mexico City locations are dreadful. Every scene in this movie looks like it was shot in the same hallway. These would be poor sets on 1990’s television budgets.
    Total Recall (1990)
    “Wow, those miniatures are great. Cool matte paintings. So what scenes take place here? What, none? Sigh. Fine. I guess we’ll just go back into the same hallway set.”
    • DP Jost Vacano went from being making Wolfgang Petersen’s German films to making truly ugly films for Verhoeven.
    • They really had a type for the female leads in Arnold’s movies didn’t they? Rachel Ticotin in this one, Rae Dawn Chong in Commando, Maria Conchita Alonso in The Running Man.
    • What the hell is with Verhoeven? The ultraviolence is so unbelievably over the top that slasher movies seem tame by comparison.
    • It’s not just the violence, either. Each effect seems designed to trigger revulsion – it is truly gross…
    • This is the cleanest, most well-lit brothel ever committed to film…
    • The prosthetic work on the mutants is a whole new level of disgusting.
    • Sweet merciful Zeus! What the hell is that prosthetic puppet thing in his chest?
    • This may be the ugliest movie I’ve ever seen.
    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Fail

    Main Cast Arnold Schwarzenegger Douglas Quaid/Hauser, Sharon Stone Lori, Michael Ironside Richter, Rachel Ticotin Melina
    Rating R
    Release Date Fri 01 Jun 1990 UTC
    Director Paul Verhoeven
    Genres Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi
    Plot When a man goes for virtual vacation memories of the planet Mars, an unexpected and harrowing series of events forces him to go to the planet for real, or does he?
    Poster Total Recall
    Runtime 113
    Tagline They stole his mind, now he wants it back.
    Writers Philip K. Dick (as Phillip K. Dick) (short story “We Can Remember It For You Wholesale”) (inspiration), Ronald Shusett (screen story) …
    Year 1990
  • Ghostbusters (1984)

    Ghostbusters (1984)

    #140RVW

    Arguably the best comedy of the 1980’s. Do you remember how big this movie was? EVERYONE saw it. Still plays just as well 30 years later…

    Ghostbusters
    “I’m gonna take back some of the things I said about you, Harold.
    You… You’ve earned it.”

    What’s more:

    I was going to save this one for June, on the 30th anniversary of the film’s release, but with the passing of Harold Ramis this week, it seems fitting to review it now.

    Ghostbusters
    “Symmetrical book stacking. Just like the Philadelphia mass turbulence of 1947.”

    Now of course, I really didn’t need to re-watch Ghostbusters, as I’ve seen it somewhere in the neighborhood of 100 times, but this was the first time I sat down with my daughter to watch it. She loved it at least as much as I did all those years ago.

    Ghostbusters
    “I think this building should be condemned. There’s serious metal fatigue in all the load-bearing members, the wiring is substandard, it’s completely inadequate for our power needs, and the neighborhood is like a demilitarized zone.”

    By now everyone likely knows the backstory: Dan Aykroyd came up with a high-concept vehicle for John Belushi and himself, also to include Eddie Murphy & John Candy. While all of those actors would surely have been wonderful, I can’t imagine this with any other cast.

    Ghostbusters
    “Our courteous and efficient staff is on call 24 hours a day to serve all your supernatural elimination needs.”

    Co-writers Harold Ramis & Dan Aykroyd team up with sketch comedy teammate Bill Murray for one of the all-time great comedy trios. They perfectly fulfill their roles as people who have worked together forever because, well, they have. There’s a camaraderie evident that sells the whole premise of why these three very different characters are together. It comes out in the written dialogue and improvised touches.

    Ghostbusters
    “Why worry? Each one of us is carrying an unlicensed nuclear accelerator on his back.”

    Interestingly, although Ernie Hudson is introduced fairly late in the film and has none of the aforementioned history, either as an actor or in character, he complements the team well, even if the character isn’t there for any easily understandable reason. (He gets much more to do and makes more sense in the sequel.)

    Ghostbusters
    “I think he can hear you, Ray.”

    Sigourney Weaver uplifts the production with her wonderful combination of smart, tough and sexy. She pretty much cannot be overused in a movie. She always brings so much more depth to characters that could feel flat.  

    Ghostbusters
    “And the flowers are still standing!”

    Rick Moranis fills out the cast with a really excellent turn as hopeless sad sack Louis Tully (this was reportedly the role that John Candy would have filled). Moranis is one of those actors who you never think of or show any real appreciation for until he shows up and steals the whole thing. Not sure why his number is never called.

    Ghostbusters
    “There is no Dana, only Zuul!”

    Perhaps surprisingly for a comedy, the special effects are really good. Oh, I know they are dated at this point, but they hold up remarkably well. The matte lines are pretty harsh (which seems like a fixable problem if anyone wanted to spend the money) so the composited elements stand out quite a bit, but other than that the VFX are quite timeless. Good mix of stop motion and puppetry for the Zuul dogs give these animals a real-world weight. The rotoscoped proton pack streams, the traps, the miniatures – all very well done. Great sound to match.

    Ghostbusters
    “Gozer the Traveler. He will come in one of the pre-chosen forms. During the rectification of the Vuldrini, the traveler came as a large and moving Torg! Then, during the third reconciliation of the last of the McKetrick supplicants, they chose a new form for him: that of a giant Slor! Many Shuvs and Zuuls knew what it was to be roasted in the depths of the Slor that day, I can tell you!”

    There are actually a number of threads to track through this film, and director Ivan Reitman shows that he is up to the task. Always hard with comics to keep them on track and make sure the monkeys aren’t running the zoo. The whole affair moves quickly – it could frankly be a little longer without overstaying its welcome. No wonder everyone wanted a sequel or two. There was no way to repeat perfection, though.

    Ghostbusters
    “I couldn’t help it. It just popped in there.”

    Finally, the title track. I don’t think I can possibly overstate how omnipresent this song was in 1984. The song is so catchy. Of course it is – you already got it stuck in your head when it was called “I Want A New Drug” by Huey Lewis and the News. Whoops…

    Ghostbusters
    “Funny us going out like this! Killed by a 100 foot marshmallow man!”

    Now please stop trying to make Ghostbusters 3…

    Ghostbusters
    “Ray, when someone asks you if you’re a god, you say “YES”!”

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Fail

    Main Cast Bill Murray Dr. Peter Venkman, Dan Aykroyd Dr. Raymond Stantz, Sigourney Weaver Dana Barrett, Harold Ramis Dr. Egon Spengler
    Rating TV-PG
    Release Date Fri 08 Jun 1984 UTC
    Director Ivan Reitman
    Genres Comedy, Fantasy, Sci-Fi
    Plot Three unemployed parapsychology professors set up shop as a unique ghost removal service.
    Poster Ghostbusters
    Runtime 105
    Tagline Here To Save The World Again [re-release]
    Writers Dan Aykroyd (written by) and, Harold Ramis (written by)
    Year 1984