Author: mfordfeeney

  • Oh, God! You Devil (1984)

    Oh, God! You Devil (1984)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    Franchise is pretty solid with understated charm of George Burns, but this is my clear favorite. Very good story arc, quiet scenes & acting.

    Oh, God! You Devil

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of Oh, God! You Devil:

    Here’s another family favorite from the back of the VHS tape cabinet. I don’t think I saw this in the theater, but I know we rented it (remember renting videotapes?) and also taped it off of cable. I can see the yellowing cassette label in my mind still.

    Even though this picture was made 30 years, I believe there’s still room for this kind of quiet picture. I like the little moments that George Burns is capable of. Such a gifted comic. This picture sort of killed the franchise, since it’s much more fun to watch Burns as the Devil than as God. But after they pushed out three of these films I don’t think anyone was in a position to complain…

    Oh, God! You Devil

    Rather than trying to write a narrative review of this picture that I’ve seen so many times, I just queued it up with my laptop in front of me and put down some thoughts. And these are those:

    • Caring father singing Fugue for Tinhorns (from Guys and Dolls) to his sick kid. What a sweet little opening. Possibly the subconscious reason I sang this to my little girl as a baby…
    • Y’know what’s funny? Even the actor names in the 80’s sounded like the decade itself; Ted Wass, Ron Silver, Roxanne Hart, Eugene Roche, Robert Desiderio, these are 80’s names. When’s the last time you ran into a Roxanne or Eugene?
    • This film is the only example I can think of where I approve of one actor playing multiple roles. It isn’t just cool to see George Burns play God and the Devil, it makes narrative sense.
    • The Devil goes by the name Harry Tophet. “I love to scare the hell out of people.”
    • “He hates it. Says he wouldn’t play it for his dog. You ever heard that? Wouldn’t play it for a dog?”

    Oh, God! You Devil

    • Love that Tophet has a “computer” in his dashboard. Pretty good for 1984. But what is the Devil driving? Is that a K car?
    • “Hawaiian Chablis? I just never saw a wine with an expiration date before.”
    • I do enjoy watching movies where the answering machine figures into the story, even mildly. It’s just amusing to me…
    • The fire and brimstone to alert the lead character that he’s messing with sinister forces? A vaudeville/ballpark organ and a sound effects tape, mixed with a Hitchcockian dolly zoom?
    • At the time I saw this picture I’d never been to a real wedding reception. When I finally attended one many years later, I somewhat expected people to actually do the hokey pokey, thanks to this movie…
    • Interesting that someone who was perfectly willing to eat a dead snail would suddenly object to a living snail. I don’t get escargot. People are weird…
    • “It’s the little things I enjoy.”

    Oh, God! You Devil

    • Little old-fashioned tricks are so effective.
    • I remember just about every single line and moment of this movie. I have no idea how many times I watched it from 1984-1986…
    • Billy Wayne’s contract expires and he’s nothing but a burning contract. See, there’s some real menace here, under the soft and safe exterior. Burns actually has an nice underlying edge.

    Oh, God! You Devil

    • “Things have a way of working out.”
    • The scene at the record label is just fantastic. Burns would have made a great negotiator had he not gone into showbiz.
    • I know that Billy Wayne’s music is terrible, but I can’t dislike it – I grew up with this cheesy soft rock. I actually really like the song for the rock n roll lifestyle montage…

    Oh, God! You Devil

    • Also, the little piano ballad Bobby Shelton is writing for his wife is lovely…
    • I wonder if this film was a big influence on Richard Marx. There’s a real resemblance…
    • The best moments in this picture are the quiet conversations. There’s a really interesting pace going on here. Nothing moves fast, but it never drags. Scenes have lots of room to breathe. I genuinely do miss this 1980’s film-making style. Mostly…

    Oh, God! You Devil

    Maybe there’s a lot of nostalgia going here, but I really still enjoyed Oh God!, You Devil decades later. I don’t know if it can be said that it holds up, any more than anything from the 80’s does, but it still works. Give it a watch; I bet you’ll enjoy it far more than you expect…

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Fail

    The Representation Test Score: C (6 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

     

    Oh, God! You Devil Representation Test

    [schema type=”movie” name=”Oh, God! You Devil” description=”George Burns is back as God, but oops, here he is as Satan, too. A young rock star is ready to sell his soul to Satan, and Satan is all too happy to oblige. Oops! Seems the fellow was watched over by God as a baby, so now the almighty and his nemesis have to duke it out over the soul.” director=”Paul Bogart” actor_1=”George Burns” ]

    Main Cast George Burns God/Harry O. Tophet, Ted Wass Bobby Shelton, Ron Silver Gary Frantz, Roxanne Hart Wendy Shelton
    Rating PG
    Release Date Fri 09 Nov 1984 UTC
    Director Paul Bogart
    Genres Comedy, Fantasy
    Plot George Burns is back as God, but oops, here he is as Satan, too. A young rock star is ready to sell his soul to Satan…
    Poster Oh, God! You Devil
    Runtime 97
    Tagline That’s funny, they both look like George Burns.
    Writers Andrew Bergman, Avery Corman (novel)
    Year 1984
  • Oh, God! Book II (1980)

    Oh, God! Book II (1980)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    Largely more of the same; possibly cuter with the emphasis on kids. More streamlined, which is good. Hard pressed to fill out even 140RVW…

    Oh, God! Book II

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of Oh, God! Book II:

    I’m not kidding – I really had a hard time even coming up with 140 characters about Oh, God! Book II

    Oh, God! Book II

    Umm…it’s good? I frankly think in some ways Oh, God! Book II is better than the original, even without the novelty of the original premise. It’s just a cleaner story. On the other hand, if the first one was too long and it had to establish the whole concept of God coming to Earth and recruiting a spokesperson, you can reasonably assume that this simpler story should take less time. Which it doesn’t.

    Oh, God! Book II

    Louanne, the young actress who plays the eleven-year-old lead character Tracy Richards, is marvelous; very cute and precocious, but more importantly a kid. She acts like a kid, she gets frustrated with God about being put-upon and things being unfair. Really a nice contrast to the lead character in the original, worried about his job and family. Both work great, but differently…

    Oh, God! Book II

    Oh, God! Book II is a good picture; don’t let my extraordinarily brief review give you a different impression. It’s just that it is exactly what it looks like; if you saw the first one, you sort of saw the second one, too. Your preference almost certainly would be for whichever one you saw first. All of these would make better TV shows than feature films, but that’s sort of a minor point. They’re cute and fun…

    Oh, God! Book II
    I never before this moment noticed the KISS poster hanging on the wall of what is otherwise a fairly straightforward 11-year-old girl’s room. In the 70’s anyway. Which this isn’t. I’d like to think it’s some sort of rebellious statement from the set designer; “Take that, right-wing music censors! Even God’s chosen one listens to KISS…”
    Poster:

    Oh, God! Book II

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Pass

    The Representation Test Score: B (10 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    Oh, God! Book II

     

    [schema type=”movie” name=”Oh, God! Book II” description=”God asks a young girl to help spread his word and influence with a slogan.” director=”Gilbert Cates” actor_1=”George Burns” ]

    Main Cast George Burns God
    Suzanne Pleshette Paula Richards
    David Birney Don Richards
    Louanne Tracy Richards
    Rating PG
    Release Date Fri 03 Oct 1980 UTC
    Director Gilbert Cates
    Genres Comedy, Fantasy
    Plot God asks a young girl to help spread his word and influence with a slogan.
    Poster Oh, God! Book II
    Runtime 94
    Tagline That’s right, I made another movie. You know me, I can’t stop creating.
    Writers Josh Greenfeld (story), Josh Greenfeld (screenplay) …
    Year 1980
  • Oh, God! (1977)

    Oh, God! (1977)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    Bet you haven’t thought of this one in forever, huh? Neither had I. Interesting to remember movies used to be this pace and no one minded…

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of Oh, God!:

    Would you believe I actually read this book before seeing the movie? It’s true. I saw the sequels as a kid, but I have just about no recollection of seeing the original picture. I do, however, remember finding the worn little paperback novel by Avery Corman in a used bookstore in Newton Highlands. It was probably age-inappropriate, but only barely – it’s not like this story ever goes very blue or very dark.

    I haven’t read the novel since I was a kid, but watching Oh, God! now, it plays almost verbatim to my memory of the story. The original novel was adapted by Larry Gelbart, whose screenplay was nominated for an Academy Award.

    It was actually really interesting watching this film series with my family. My daughter absolutely ate it up; I was quite pleasantly surprised. I knew she’d love Oh, God! Book II if we ever got to it, but that was far from a certainty. I really had no idea how she’d respond to something so dated. She’s watched older films, of course, but Oh, God! absolutely screams 1977 and I knew I’d need to explain about payphones, etc. She really enjoyed it, though…

    Oh, God!

    It’s sort of funny to look back on this film. At the time it was a big hit; it was the sixth biggest picture in 1977. It made more than Annie Hall and The Spy Who Loved Me!

    (Sidebar: what a mixed bag 1977 was – we got classic films like Star Wars, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, and Slapshot, but it also saw the deaths of Elvis Presley, Groucho & Gummo Marx, Charlie Chaplin and Howard Hawks…)

    Oh, God!

    The story is cute and covertly subversive. Not only were they able to talk about God in a feature film, they managed to get across huge section of preaching disguised as dialogue. George Burns is a real Trojan Horse – when he delivers the message, people listen…

    Aside from Burns, it’s a bizarre cast. First off, John Denver is just not a lead actor. I like his everyman appeal and everything, but it seems as though every single line of dialogue is shouted. Terri Garr is well cast as his put-upon wife, or maybe I just love Terri Garr too much to be objective.

    But the supporting roles: Donald Pleasence, Dinah Shore, and Paul Sorvino as a bible-thumping televangelist – it’s truly odd stuff. Barnard Hughes is a judge for goodness sake – that’s how stodgy it is…

    Oh, God!

    I know it’s a cute little comedy and everything, but if God were to come to Earth and try to convince a courtroom full of people of his existence, I have a hard time believing he’d use card tricks. This movie came out five months after Star Wars – that’s just not going to get her done…

    Oh, God! is a fun little picture. At 98 minutes it’s far too long to hold the attention of modern filmgoers. It was probably too long even then – the thing really creeps along considering how few actual events are pictured. But if you can slow yourself down and make time for it, Oh, God! really is a clever little film. It’s not as entertaining maybe as the sequels (to my eye), but there’s some really good dialogue. Recommended…

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Fail

    The Representation Test Score: C (5 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    Oh, God! Representation Test
    [schema type=”movie” name=”Oh, God!” description=”When God appears to an assistant grocery manager as a good natured old man, the Almighty selects him as his messenger for the modern world.” director=”Carl Reiner” producer=”Jerry Weintraub” actor_1=”George Burns”]

    Main Cast John Denver Jerry Landers
    George Burns God
    Teri Garr Bobbie Landers
    Donald Pleasence Doctor Harmon
    Rating PG
    Release Date Fri 07 Oct 1977 UTC
    Director Carl Reiner
    Genres Comedy, Fantasy
    Plot When God appears to an assistant grocery manager as a good natured old man, the Almighty selects him as his messenger for the modern world.
    Poster Oh, God!
    Runtime 98
    Tagline “It’s true. People have trouble remembering My Words. Moses had such a bad memory I had to give him tablets.”
    Writers Larry Gelbart (screenplay), Avery Corman (based on the novel by)
    Year 1977
  • Ashanti (1979)

    Ashanti (1979)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    Not nearly as crappy as it looks, this 1979 star-packed anti-slavery film could have actually been a good picture with a little more care…

    Ashanti

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of Ashanti:

    A tale of modern day slavery (well, 1979 modern day). Don’t know how I’ve never heard of this before now. Starring Michael Caine, Peter Ustinov, Omar Sharif, Rex Harrison AND William Holden!

    The film is based on the novel Ebano by Alberto Vázquez-Figueroa, which was itself based on a true story. Directed by Richard Fleisher, Ashanti is an absolutely horrific tale that doesn’t shy away from the most distasteful aspects of the sickening world of slavery.

    Ashanti

    Caine and model turned actress Beverly Johnson play Doctors David & Anansa Linderby who work for the World Health Organization (WHO) providing care in West Africa. When Anansa is kidnapped by slavers, David must traverse the continent to try and get her back before the party crosses the Red Sea.

    It’s really great to see well-seasoned vets like Holden and Harrison. With their names in the credits I somewhat expected them to stick out like out-of-place cameos, but these are real (if small) parts. Ustinov is very interesting as the slaver Suleiman; it’s the first villain role in his entire career.

    Ashanti

    Michael Caine’s character is so bizarre. Out in a strange land where he doesn’t speak the language, know the customs or have any resources, he is deeply mistrustful and hostile to the few people who offer assistance. I get the lack of trust, his wife has just been kidnapped after all, but why is he pushing away the only people who want to help?

    Good looking picture; well-shot, beautiful country. (Filmed in Kenya, Israel & Sicily.) Also well-shot ugliness at times. The seventies music is a drag, though, really making the project feel low-rent…

    Ashanti

    Things take a really weird turn past the one hour mark when one of the slaves proves himself to be a witch doctor. Truly bizarre and completely atonal considering the grounded quality of everything up to that point…

    Kabir Bedi as Malik, a wronged husband and father seeking revenge on Sulieman has a wonderful intensity.

    Ashanti

    Even with Caine doing his version of phoning it in, he still burns with an intensity in many scenes. He’s such a fine actor that when he coasts he’s still leaving many others in the dust. Unfortunately I suspect he knows this. Caine has disowned this picture, shamelessly admitting that it was a paycheck project that he has no love for. Firstly, I resent actors pulling that crap; you took the job, you took the money, it’s bad form to deride the project. A lot of people work hard on even the world’s worst films. It’s insulting and disrespectful to their efforts to run down the picture just because you’ve moved on. I’m a firm believer that when you take on a job you have a responsibility to give it your best effort and far more importantly your best intentions. The producers aren’t simply paying you to show up and act – I believe there is a duty to try to make the picture work beyond your time in front of the lens. You should take your part in promoting the work; speak well of the film, or at least speak no evil. And even if you think you are above the project, don’t let it show.

    Ashanti

    Omar Sharif is such a great actor that they had to bulk up the part for him. I’m not complaining, particularly, as he’s always great to watch, but it does add a sort of unusual turning in the last 15 minutes of the picture.

    The ending, with things tied up so neatly, is so pat and unsatisfying it nearly made me go back and remove anything positive I said about the rest of the film. The feel of the final shots is completely disrespectful to all of the characters who suffered and died in the story.

    Ashanti

    Despite the poster, Ashanti is not actually an exploitation picture. It doesn’t deal in casual, cruel violence, sexual or otherwise. There is casual, cruel violence, and there are definite trigger points for victims of abuse, but it is never glorified or presented in an voyeuristic or exploitative manner. This movie deals with hard truths and doesn’t flinch from showing them, but no more so than a documentary on the same subject – never for entertainment value or as a storytelling tool.

    Ashanti is an interesting film. Very uneven, but there are some really interesting moments. Some of the chases through the Sahara are very fine. With some more work this truly could have been a good picture.

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Fail

    The Representation Test Score: C (4 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    Ashanti Representation Test
    [schema type=”movie” name=”Ashanti” description=”Dr. Anansa Linderby is kidnapped in a medical mission in Africa by a slave trader. From this moment, her husband will do anything to recover her and to punish the bad guys, but that will be not an easy task.” director=”Richard Fleisher” actor_1=”Michael Caine” ]

    Main Cast Michael Caine Dr. David Linderby
    Peter Ustinov Suleiman
    Kabir Bedi Malik
    Beverly Johnson Dr. Anansa Linderby
    Rating R
    Release Date Sun 01 Apr 1979 UTC
    Director Richard Fleischer
    Genres Action, Adventure, Drama, Mystery, Thriller
    Plot Dr. Anansa Linderby is kidnapped in a medical mission in Africa by a slave trader. From this moment, her husband will do anything to recover her and to punish the bad guys, but that will be not an easy task.
    Poster Ashanti
    Runtime 118
    Tagline Slave trading lives today!
    Writers Stephen Geller (screenplay), Alberto Vázquez Figueroa (as Alberto Vasquez-Figueroa) (novel)
    Year 1979
  • Mad Max (1979)

    Mad Max (1979)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    What was a bold, unique action film may now seem very tame and slow, but the original film is still crucial in understanding the character.

    Mad Max

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of Mad Max:

    Even though I’ve seen the sequels many times, this is actually only my third or fourth time watching the original Mad Max. I know it’s a classic and everything, but there really is no going back after The Road Warrior. If I saw this first I know it would have been so much more meaningful.

    Mad Max

    I vividly the first time I saw Mad Max. A bunch of us were at our friend Dave’s house – where we played RPGs like Dungeons & Dragons and Call of Cthulhu, listened to tons of heavy metal and watched dozens of oddball sci-fi pictures. It was where I first saw Bad Taste, Highlander and bootlegged copies of movies like the Dolph Lundgren Punisher that wouldn’t get released in the States. In some ways, Mad Max was just another in a long line of quirky foreign films.

    Mad Max

    Mad Max is a good movie right up until the moment you see The Road Warrior. After that, there’s really no point watching the original, save for possible nostalgia.

    Mad Max

    It’s a brutal, 1970’s style film. Simultaneously, it’s a low budget picture and feels like it. Mad Max is more of a good idea for a movie than a movie in of itself. It’s like a demo; unique and possessing qualities the finished product doesn’t have, but still clearly undercooked.

    Mad Max

    As revenge pictures go, it’s not much of one, though I realize it’s 1979. Still, this is hardly Peckinpah material. Max doesn’t actually pursue anyone in revenge until 15 minutes before the end of the film and frankly, his payback is neither grisly or particularly scary. In point of fact, the most engaged he gets with a criminal is at the climax of the film, and it isn’t even with the leader of the gang. In other words, the main villain isn’t the main villain…

    Mad Max

    The suspense level is pretty high for so little actual action, which isn’t really a bad thing, just surprising seeing where these films would shortly go.

    Mad Max

    Visually the film is fabulous – truly unique. It’s as bleak and desolate as the future the story depicts. I love that all they needed to do to depict a world bereft of law, order and hope was go to a remote area in Australia. I find that terribly amusing…

    Mad Max

    In regards to the acting, the best you can say is that it’s easy to understand why Mel Gibson would soon be a star. He is charismatic.

    The music is truly awful – so melodramatic.

    Mad Max

    Mad Max is a good movie. I don’t wish it to seem as though I don’t like it. It’s a great start to what would prove to be a franchise, and it is utterly remarkable what director George Miller & producer Byron Kennedy were able to achieve with so little resources. The fact that Mad Max 2: The Road Warrior would shortly make the original Mad Max seem underdone by comparison shouldn’t reflect negatively on a very good, original film. (It sort of does, though…)

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Fail

    The Representation Test Score: D (1 pt)

    Mad Max Representation Test

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    [schema type=”movie” url=”http://www.madmaxonline.com/” name=”Mad Max” description=”In a self-destructing world, a vengeful Australian policeman sets out to stop a violent motorcycle gang.” director=”George Miller” producer=”Byron Kennedy” actor_1=”Mel Gibson” ]

    Main Cast Mel Gibson Max
    Joanne Samuel Jessie
    Hugh Keays-Byrne Toecutter
    Steve Bisley Jim Goose
    Rating R
    Release Date Thu 12 Apr 1979 UTC
    Director George Miller
    Genres Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi, Thriller
    Plot In a self-destructing world, a vengeful Australian policeman sets out to stop a violent motorcycle gang.
    Poster Mad Max
    Runtime 93
    Tagline He rules the roads.
    Writers James McCausland (screenplay) &, George Miller (screenplay)
    Year 1979