Tag: 2005

  • Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith (2005)

    Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith (2005)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    The prequels go out with a bang; ROTS is the best & tightest of the bunch. A great SW film, it is still nearly as frustrating as the rest…

    Star Wars - Episode III: Revenge of the Sith

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith:

    Ten years ago today, what we believed at the time (because everyone involved swore up and down it was so) to be the final Star Wars film came out in theaters around the world. The first two Star Wars prequels had been met with equal parts adoration and derision, but everyone seemed on board with the final chapter. The return of the man in the black mask. THIS is what we’d all been waiting for…

    Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith is certainly the best prequel, even if that is somewhat damning with faint praise. An argument can be made that it is on par with Return of the Jedi, and many people actually rated Episode III higher than VI at the time (me included).

    With time I think I realized that no matter how much I liked Revenge of the Sith, it really couldn’t be said to be a better film than Return of the Jedi. But Episode III is a very fine film.

    With a new Star Wars film coming out later in 2015, I’m going to be writing in-depth pieces on each film, so I think I’ll leave more discussion of Revenge of the Sith for later. (Particularly as my first draft is already a couple of pages long and I haven’t even started talking about the story yet.) For now, enjoy the 10th anniversary of Episode III (and the 16th of Episode I) and try to see the forest for the trees. While Sith is probably the sloppiest of all the films and has a tendency to feel like a to-do list at times rather than a unique film, it carries the most depth and emotion of all of the prequels and adds perspective and import to the Original Trilogy.

    More coming soon…

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Opening Crawl:


    Star Wars: Episode III Revenge of the Sith – Opening Crawl on Disney Video

    Bechdel Test:

    Fail

    The Representation Test Score: D (3 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    Revenge of the Sith Representation Test

    [schema type=”movie” url=”http://www.starwars.com/films/star-wars-episode-iii-revenge-of-the-sith” name=”Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith (2005)” description=”Years after the onset of the Clone Wars, the noble Jedi Knights lead a massive clone army into a galaxy-wide battle against the Separatists. When the sinister Sith unveil a thousand-year-old plot to rule the galaxy, the Republic crumbles and from its ashes rises the evil Galactic Empire. Jedi hero Anakin Skywalker is seduced by the dark side of the Force to become the Emperor’s new apprentice — Darth Vader. The Jedi are decimated, as Obi-Wan Kenobi and Jedi Master Yoda are forced into hiding. The only hope for the galaxy are Anakin’s own offspring — the twin children born in secrecy who will grow up to become heroes.” director=”George Lucas” producer=”George McCallum” actor_1=”Hayden Christensen” ]

    Main Cast Hayden Christensen Anakin Skywalker
    Natalie Portman Padmé
    Ewan McGregor Obi-Wan Kenobi
    Samuel L. Jackson Mace Windu
    Rating PG-13
    Release Date Thu 19 May 2005 UTC
    Director George Lucas
    Genres Action, Adventure, Fantasy, Sci-Fi
    Plot As the Clone Wars near an end, the Sith Lord Darth Sidious steps out of the shadows, at which time Anakin succumbs to his emotions, becoming Darth Vader and putting his relationships with Obi-Wan and Padme at risk.
    Poster Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith
    Runtime 140
    Tagline The saga is complete.
    Writers George Lucas (written by)
    Year 2005
  • The Muppets’ Wizard of Oz (2005)

    The Muppets’ Wizard of Oz (2005)

    #140RVW

    Before I review the new movie, let’s revisit what we were stuck with before the reboot, shall we? Nothing really wrong with this, just okay.

    The Muppets' Wizard of Oz
    “Those of you who have Dark Side of the Moon, press play now.”

    What’s more:

    Yes, it’s a tv movie, so I’m not going to be too tough on it. Actually, there really is no need to get too worked up about it, anyway, since it’s not bad. The biggest problem is the same problem with any Muppet tv special and to a slightly lesser degree any Muppet movie: the insistence on featuring bleeding edge relevant “stars” in cameos. That always dates these things, since most famous people don’t stay famous for long.

    While not on the level of adapted works like Christmas Carol or Treasure Island, they do a good job with the obvious jokes and even get some really good one-liners in there. Your enjoyment of this movie will depend largely on how amusing you find Pepe the Prawn; there’s a lot of him in this one…

    Poster:

    The Muppets' Wizard of Oz

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Pass

    The Representation Test Score: A (12 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    Representation Test

    Main Cast Ashanti Dorothy Gale, Jeffrey Tambor Wizard, Quentin Tarantino Himself, David Alan Grier Uncle Henry
    Rating TV-PG
    Release Date Fri 20 May 2005 UTC
    Director Kirk R. Thatcher
    Genres Adventure, Comedy, Family, Fantasy, Music
    Plot This version of The Wizard of Oz is played by the Muppets!
    Poster The Muppets' Wizard of Oz
    Runtime 120
    Tagline Hit the Bricks this May!
    Writers Debra Frank (teleplay) &, Steve L. Hayes (teleplay) …
    Year 2005
  • The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy (2005)

    The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy (2005)

    140 Character Movie Review – #140RVW

    Don’t say it takes too many liberties with the story. This is the movie that Douglas Adams wanted to make; he wrote most of the screenplay.

    The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy

    Spoiler-free Movie Review of The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy…:

    Sort of surprised to realize I hadn’t already reviewed this, as it’s one of my very favorite movies. It just always puts me in a really good mood.

    Like virtually every movie based on a beloved book, it has a lot of detractors. Most seem to be upset that the movie is too American, too Hollywood, not British enough, different from the book. Your criticisms are noted – and irrelevant.

    The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy

    This is the movie that Douglas Adams would have made had he lived to see it. He wrote most of the screenplay and was the one who came up with every substantial new story element. He felt that only Arthur Dent needed to be British. And most importantly, Adams viewed his most celebrated work as a living thing; remember that it started not as a novel but as a radio play. He frequently revised his work as it morphed from radio to book to tv to computer game to theater production and all the way back.

    The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy

    All works need to be flexible if they are to make a successful transition to a new medium. All that matters is that you don’t lose the spirit of the original material as you adjust for the different needs of film.

    So does it retain the spirit of Adams’ work? Damn right it does. The changes were needed; the book really doesn’t have a consistent narrative; it’s just things happening one after another. (Some still complain that the movie doesn’t do enough to change this and suffers from the same problem.) Trillian & Arthur needed more of a love story – an Adams addition. The only add that I don’t really get is the whole Humma Kavula character, but again, Adams created him.

    The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy

    The other issue that fans complain about is casting. Here I must wildly diverge from the fanboy base. I LOVE the casting.

    • I don’t know who visualized Mos Def as Ford Prefect but they deserve a special casting Oscar. I think Mos is perfect, giving the whole affair a fresh feel; he’s got the attitude a planet-hopping hitchhiking writer needs.
    • Similarly, Sam Rockwell is fantastic. If you feel that he’s too over the top, I hear you. But I think over the top is needed in a movie with so much dialogue and subtle humor.
    • As for Zooey Deschanel, she is a bit inconsistent. Her first scene aboard the Heart of Gold is really awkward – she just seems to be having trouble playing off of Marvin the Paranoid Android. But if you don’t let that early scene influence your impression you’ll realize the way she plays Trillian lends some credibility to the character and why someone would go parading around the galaxy.
    • I don’t hear any bitching about Martin Freeman, with good reason, as he is as perfect an Arthur Dent as could ever be expected.

    The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy

    Hammer and Tongs, the pairing of director Garth Jennings with his producer Nick Goldsmith, were recommended by Spike Jonze after he passed on directing the film. Coming from a music video background, Jennings brings a wonderful visual style to Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. The production design and visual effects are top shelf and unique, which can be very difficult in science fiction.

    The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy

    Really I can’t see why people don’t like this movie. Bill Nighy and Helen Mirren drop by for great roles, the Guide itself is a lust-worthy thing of beauty (and voiced by Stephen Fry), the opening song is magnificent, Douglas Adams’ mum has a cameo, Deep Thought is so cool, Marvin is played by Warwick Davis and voiced by Alan Rickman; it’s just a really fun movie.

    The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

    Poster:

    Trailer:

    Bechdel Test:

    Fail

    The Representation Test Score: C (6 pts)

    (http://therepresentationproject.org/grading-hollywood-the-representation-test/)

    The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Representation Test

    [schema type=”movie” name=”The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” description=”Mere seconds before the Earth is to be demolished by an alien construction crew, journeyman Arthur Dent is swept off the planet by his friend Ford Prefect, a researcher penning a new edition of “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy.”” director=”Garth Jennings” actor_1=”Martin Freeman” actor_2=”Mos Def” actor_3=”Sam Rockwell” actor_4=”Zooey Deschanel” ]

    Main Cast Martin Freeman Arthur Dent, Mos Def Ford Prefect, Sam Rockwell Zaphod Beeblebrox, Zooey Deschanel Trillian
    Rating PG
    Release Date Fri 29 Apr 2005 UTC
    Director Garth Jennings
    Genres Adventure, Comedy, Sci-Fi
    Plot Mere seconds before the Earth is to be demolished by an alien construction crew, journeyman Arthur Dent is swept off the planet by his friend Ford Prefect, a researcher penning a new edition of “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy.”
    Poster The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
    Runtime 109
    Tagline Don’t Panic
    Writers Douglas Adams (book), Douglas Adams (screenplay) …
    Year 2005
  • #140RVW: Joyeux Noël (Frohe Weihnachten) (Merry Christmas) (2005)

    #140RVW: Joyeux Noël (Frohe Weihnachten) (Merry Christmas) (2005)

    Composite characters/story make up this account of factual Christmas Truce of 1914. Great moments & worthy tale; maybe a touch sentimental.

    Caractères composites / histoire composent ce compte de faits Trêve de Noël de 1914. Grands moments et digne conte; peut-être une touche sentimentale.

    Composite-Zeichen / Geschichte machen dieses Konto von Sach Weihnachten Waffenstillstand von 1914. Große Momente & würdig Geschichte, vielleicht ein Hauch sentimental.

    Joyeux Noël

    Poster:

    Trailer:

  • #140RVW: The Happy Elf (2005)

    #140RVW: The Happy Elf (2005)

    Based on good Harry Connick song, story is funny & backed with few minor songs. Animation not bad but seems unfinished. Voice talent good…

    The Happy Elf

    Poster:

    Happy Elf

    Trailer: